[Rhodes22-list] Doors and Windows

[Rik Sandberg]

Michael and Roger

You guys ever thought about becoming self employed????? "They" can't fire
you then :-) Trouble is, you can never quit either.

You guys can post all the resumes you want here with my blessing. Got a
hunch though, that there ain't anybody here that's hiring :-)

Rik
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Meltzer" <mjm@michaelmeltzer.com>
To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Doors and Windows


> works for me, networking networking
> I take it you are still looking, I started to send them out also.
>
> MJM
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roger Pihlaja" <cen09402@centurytel.net>
> To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Doors and Windows
>
>
> > Gee Michael, could I post my resume?
> >
> > Roger
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Michael Meltzer" <mjm@michaelmeltzer.com>
> > To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 12:50 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Doors and Windows
> >
> >
> > > For what it is worth, I am in the camp of what ever people what to
talk
> > about, the single subject list I find very borring, aslong
> > > as it not blantant SPAm(chain letters, get rich quick etc..). Beside
the
> > way things are going I might be posting my resume here soon
> > > :-)
> > >
> > > MJM
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Rik Sandberg" <racerrik@rea-alp.com>
> > > To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 11:15 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Doors and Windows
> > >
> > >
> > > > Bill,
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I see your point.
> > > >
> > > > I see no reason for us to hide our businesses/occupations from the
other
> > > > folks on the list. Rummy is right, we would be wasting a great
knowledge
> > > > pool to take a position like this. I do believe though that to fit
in
> > the
> > > > intended guidelines for use of the list, a question to someone about
> > their
> > > > area of expertise (non-sailing) could be asked on the list, then the
> > details
> > > > of this subject could/should be taken up back channel, between the
two
> > > > interested parties. This seems very reasonable (adult) to me. My
feeling
> > on
> > > > this is, we have always talked about whatever we wanted in here. I
find
> > the
> > > > lists or BBs that restrict their subject to EXACTLY their main
subject
> > to be
> > > > boring as hell, to put it mildly. Mostly one spends his time on
these
> > boards
> > > > reading posts from people bitching about other peoples OT
> > > > posts......uh.....whoopeee, isn't that a productive use of my time.
> > > >
> > > > Let's not let ourselves become this closed minded.
> > > >
> > > > Mike, don't worry about your signature, it's just fine the way it
is.
> > > >
> > > > Rik
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Bill Effros" <bill@effros.com>
> > > > To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 9:32 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Doors and Windows
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Rik,
> > > > >
> > > > > This has never been a problem because most of the people on this
list
> > are
> > > > > adults (Will--I include you in the adult category).  But the
location
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > imaginary line between acceptable and unacceptable commerce has
> > remained
> > > > > understandably fuzzy.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am merely suggesting a slightly more liberal view of where this
line
> > > > might
> > > > > be.  Having made the contact on-list, should the discussion
continue
> > > > on-list
> > > > > or go back-channel?
> > > > >
> > > > > Bill
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Rik Sandberg" <racerrik@rea-alp.com>
> > > > > To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org>
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:15 AM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Doors and Windows
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Bill,
> > > > >
> > > > > Agree with you whole heartedly on the trusting advice from the
members
> > of
> > > > > the list thing. But, where did the non-sailing post part come
from.
> > It's
> > > > > all looked like sailing related stuff to me. And even if it
wasn't,
> > we've
> > > > > never been all that picky about people letting there occupation be
> > known,
> > > > > have we???? Never hurts to know folks backgrounds IMHO. There are
> > several
> > > > > folks whose email signatures have their company name or occupation
> > > > included
> > > > > in them. I have no problem with that.
> > > > >
> > > > > Rik
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > At 09:56 AM 10/16/2002 -0400, you wrote:
> > > > > >Mike,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I need to know more about doors and windows.  Can you help?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Bill Effros
> > > > > >
> > > > > >PS -- To the list -- In these troubled times I see nothing wrong
with
> > > > > people
> > > > > >indicating how they make a living if they choose to do so.  We
all
> > turn
> > > > to
> > > > > >the net for advice and to purchase--usually from perfect
strangers.
> > Many
> > > > > of
> > > > > >us have "known each other" for years through this list.  I
certainly
> > > > would
> > > > > >trust list members advice and would happily purchase from them if
it
> > made
> > > > > >sense.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >If non-sailing posting is clearly labeled in the subject line I
would
> > > > have
> > > > > >no problem with simply deleting those that are of no interest to
me,
> > and
> > > > > >learning from my friends about subjects I know less about.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Just a thought.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > > >From: "DeWald, Michael Roy" <DewalMR@TheLumberYard.com>
> > > > > >To: "'The Rhodes 22 mail list'" <rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org>
> > > > > >Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 7:46 AM
> > > > > >Subject: RE: [Rhodes22-list] boat show recap
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >My wife and I were at the show on Monday.  The day was beautiful
and
> > the
> > > > > >show was not crowded.  We had the pleasure of meeting Elton and
going
> > for
> > > > a
> > > > > >test sail with Stan. Our main purpose of going to the show was to
see
> > the
> > > > > >Rhodes 22 and I was very impressed.  I loved the way the boat
sailed.
> > > > The
> > > > > >control from the IMF and the roller furler genoa was wonderful.
We
> > > > started
> > > > > >out with the boat flat and increased sail as we went.  My wife
really
> > > > liked
> > > > > >how easy it was to decrease the sail area to reduce heeling. She
gets
> > > > > really
> > > > > >nervous when the boat leans. Stan and Elton were very helpful and
a
> > real
> > > > > joy
> > > > > >to talk with.  Since we currently own an Oday 22, the question
> > becomes if
> > > > > we
> > > > > >buy a new boat shouldn't it be bigger than another 22 foot boat?
We
> > also
> > > > > >liked the salty looks and the room inside the Compac 25.  The
price
> > to
> > > > buy
> > > > > >either boat new is out of the question, so the used or recycled
> > market is
> > > > > >more realistic.  We felt very safe and in control in the Rhodes,
I
> > just
> > > > > wish
> > > > > >it had the interior room of the Compac. We usually only day sail
but
> > > > would
> > > > > >like to make some longer trips on the bay with the right boat.
We
> > are
> > > > > about
> > > > > >1 year away from buying our next boat and the Rhodes is still at
the
> > top
> > > > of
> > > > > >my next boat list.  The support for the boat from this group and
the
> > > > > feeling
> > > > > >of safety while sailing her make a strong case for owning a
Rhodes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Sincerly
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Mike DeWald
> > > > > >Door and Window Company
> > > > > >Mt Wolf, PA
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > > >From: Ben Schultz [mailto:BenS@ApproSystems.com]
> > > > > >Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:08 PM
> > > > > >To: Rhodes List (E-mail)
> > > > > >Subject: [Rhodes22-list] boat show recap
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Sorry that I didn't see more of you (didn't even get a chance to
meet
> > > > Stan)
> > > > > >this weekend.  There was just sooo much to see and do, that I
> > couldn't
> > > > > >justify hanging around the boat that I know and love already.
Elton
> > did
> > > > > >talk me out of trying to check a bimini with the airline, which
> > leaves me
> > > > > to
> > > > > >figure out how I'm going to aviod roasting through another
Louisiana
> > > > > summer,
> > > > > >but at least I have 9 months to worry about it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I had hoped to scout a place to get a pint of beer and watch the
> > Tigers
> > > > > play
> > > > > >Florida, and then go issue a general invitation to the Rhodies,
but
> > the
> > > > > only
> > > > > >spot I could find seemed to be about 5 miles from the tube, so I
> > ended up
> > > > > >back in my hotel to watch.  The admiral fell asleep, so I
couldn't
> > even
> > > > > roar
> > > > > >and cheer like I wanted to when we chose not to run up the score
at
> > the
> > > > > end.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I am really envious of those of you who live in the area.  What
great
> > > > > >sailing grounds Chesapeake appears to be -- especially for a boat
> > like
> > > > the
> > > > > >Rhodes 22!  I will definitely find my way back.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Ben
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> > > > > >The information transmitted may contain confidential material and
is
> > > > > >intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed.
> > > > > >Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or
taking
> > of
> > > > any
> > > > > >action by persons or entities other than the intended recipient
is
> > > > > >prohibited.
> > > > > >If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the
information
> > from
> > > > > >your system and contact the sender.
> > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >_________________________________________________
> > > > > >Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > > >_________________________________________________
> > > > > >Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >_________________________________________________
> > > > > >Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > >
> > > > > _________________________________________________
> > > > > Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _________________________________________________
> > > > > Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _________________________________________________
> > > > Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________
> > > Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >
> >
> > _________________________________________________
> > Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> _________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>