[Rhodes22-list] slides vs digital camera

[Wally Buck]

Dave,

I like the cost savings as well. Also for posting and emailing you can't 
beat it.

Wally


>From: "David Walker" <david.walker5 at comcast.net>
>Reply-To: The Rhodes 22 mail list <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] slides vs digital camera
>Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 21:51:01 -0400
>
>Most pro's are going digital big time.  Cost savings from no film and
>processing for a busy pro can payback a digital camera in less than a year.
>For me its the quick turn and the capability of making my own prints.   I
>still plan on doing most weddings with film though, mainly because the post
>production is so intensive, I'd rather have a wedding lab just do it.
>
>Dave
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Wally Buck" <tnrhodey at hotmail.com>
>To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 7:22 PM
>Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] slides vs digital camera
>
>
> > David,
> >
> > I used to sell high end Macs, image setters, slide and drum scanners to
>the
> > digital pre-press industry. A few years ago all of my customers still
>liked
> > slides. It sounds like digital has bridged the quality gap. You still 
>see
>a
> > bunch of the pros sticking to the old gear though. Is this because they
> > don't want to spend the money on new equipment?
> >
> > I have always been a autofocus (point and shoot) guy and don't know much
> > about cameras.  I love my Fuj Digital camera though!  You can't beat the
> > instant gratification and the low cost to view a pic.
> >
> > Wally
> >
> >
> > >From: "David Walker" <david.walker5 at comcast.net>
> > >Reply-To: The Rhodes 22 mail list <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > >To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > >Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] First Rain Storm - slides vs digital 
>camera
> > >Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 18:39:22 -0400
> > >
> > >Wally,
> > >
> > >I spent a number of years convincing myself that scaning slides was
>better
> > >than direct digital.  That changed about a year ago when I worked along
> > >side
> > >another pro documenting our son's championship soccer season.  I shot
>film
> > >and scanned, he shot a Nikon D1.  His stuff blew mine out of the water
>(and
> > >the D1 is a generation behind, 2.2 MP camera).
> > >
> > >I finally bought a Nikon D100 about 6 months ago.  I shave shot very
>little
> > >film since.  The D100 is a 6 MP camera and produces phenomenal images.
> > >
> > >The way I look at it is that the 35mm slide itself may have inherently
> > >higher resolution, but getting that resolution into some useful form (a
> > >print or a digital file) requires additional resolution degrading 
>steps.
>A
> > >camera direct digital file is already digital and is ready for 
>whatever.
> > >
> > >Dave Walker
> > >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Wally Buck" <tnrhodey at hotmail.com>
> > >To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > >Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 3:40 PM
> > >Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] First Rain Storm - slides vs digital 
>camera
> > >
> > >
> > > > Scan from slide still provides the best reslults doesn't it? Digital
> > >cameras
> > > > have come a long way but unless you have an extremely high end 
>digital
> > > > camera there is still a big difference in quality.
> > > >
> > > > Wally
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >From: "Michael Meltzer" <mjm at michaelmeltzer.com>
> > > > >Reply-To: The Rhodes 22 mail list <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > > > >To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > > > >Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] First Rain Storm
> > > > >Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 14:26:05 -0400
> > > > >
> > > > >not shocked that he is cheap, got that impresstion too, he has a
> > >website
> > > > >that looks like limited runs of sailing/boating books,
> > > > >tight margins i am sure. It is mosty to get a rhodes22 on the 
>cover.
>My
> > >bet
> > > > >that who ever is doing the jacket only know how to work
> > > > >with slides and has been doing slides for the last 50 years, seim
> > >retired
> > > > >and do not  know digital.
> > > > >
> > > > >MJM
> > > > >
> > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > >From: "David Walker" <david.walker5 at comcast.net>
> > > > >To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > > > >Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 2:13 PM
> > > > >Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] First Rain Storm
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Jim Connolly and I are trying to get together on the water this
> > >weekend
> > > > >for
> > > > > > some pictures, but the weather forecasts don't look promising.
>Had
> > >a
> > > > >call
> > > > > > with Stan Grayson about it.  He is publishing a book, but trying
>to
> > >get
> > > > > > everything in it donated (ie no $ for licensing the photo).  His
> > > > >business is
> > > > > > not listed in the Marblehead local directory but his home number
>is.
> > > > >Also
> > > > > > his requirement of a slide (vs direct digital) goes against all 
>I
> > >know
> > > > >in
> > > > > > the publishing industry.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dave
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: "Michael Meltzer" <mjm at michaelmeltzer.com>
> > > > > > To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > > > > > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 1:35 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] First Rain Storm
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > BTW were you able to do anything with the picture?, saw stan
>take
> > >a
> > > > >pass.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > MJM
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: "David Walker" <david.walker5 at comcast.net>
> > > > > > > To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > > > > > > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 12:30 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] First Rain Storm
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Careful where you drill the hole, too far forward and it 
>will
> > >drain
> > > > >into
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > cabin.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Dave
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > From: "Rob Lowe" <rlowe at vt.edu>
> > > > > > > > To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 9:58 AM
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] First Rain Storm
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I've thought of the same thing, so I'm curious to hear 
>some
> > > > >responses.
> > > > > > > > Mark
> > > > > > > > > tells me the water is supposed to drain down the 
>centerboard
> > >line
> > > > > > hole,
> > > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > > mine has a thicker line than his and tends to get clogged
>with
> > > > >junk
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > drain well.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Rob Lowe
> > > > > > > > > S/V Getaway
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > > From: "Robert Dilk" <Robert.Dilk at TRW.COM>
> > > > > > > > > To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 9:44 AM
> > > > > > > > > Subject: [Rhodes22-list] First Rain Storm
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Had the Rhodes 22 out in a real down pour Sunday.
> > > > > > > > > With the girls in the cabin and close hauled the rain 
>water
> > >built
> > > > >up
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > forward area of the seat drain track and seat. The forward
> > >Corners
> > > > > > have no
> > > > > > > > > drains. The result was wet bottoms.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > My thought was to drill some drain holes in the forward
> > >Corners
> > >of
> > > > >the
> > > > > > > > seat
> > > > > > > > > drain tracks and let the water drain to the cockpit floor.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Any comments, suggestions?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Bob
> > > > > > > > > S/V knot Necessary
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? 
>www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? 
>www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > > > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > > >
> > > > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >__________________________________________________
> > > > >Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > >
> > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
> > > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >
> > >__________________________________________________
> > >Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
> > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>
>__________________________________________________
>Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list

_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online  
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963