[ham] Re: [Rhodes22-list] Politics on the list. my .01

Steve rhodes2282 at yahoo.com
Thu Dec 4 06:11:37 EST 2003 

Yeah, I know Mark; may have went a little far below
but if he going to refer to me; his point need to be
right.  I haven't disparaged anyone.  That why we use
the :-) when were joking.  Keep everything freindly!
Steve


--- Mark Kaynor <mark at kaynor.org> wrote:
> Okay, kids. Can we play nice now? 
> 
> Mark Kaynor
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org]On Behalf
> Of Steve
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 8:52 AM
> To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
> Subject: Re: [ham] Re: [Rhodes22-list] Politics on
> the list. my .01
> 
> 
> Fred
> No one is belittleing anyone.  Their jokes!!!!!!!!!!
> 
> And this is free information we are passing around.
> I
> be damn is I am going to waste a lot of time trying
> to
> spell every word right.  By the way, I have yet to
> see
> 1 message from you that helped any sailor on this
> list.  Do you even know how to sail!!!!!!!!!!!!
> Steve
> 
> 
> --- FredkLange at aol.com wrote:
> > Steve,
> > 
> > The point is, there would be more than 100 members
> > if people were not turned 
> > away by having their politics, gender, race,
> > religion, etc., disparaged.
> > 
> > Rik,
> > 
> > I'm amazed you would join a list about something
> you
> > find boring.  If you 
> > want to discuss other things, join other lists.
> > 
> > Bill,
> > 
> > You offer hope that we can improve the charter
> > democratically.  How should we 
> > go about it?
> > 
> > Todd,
> > 
> > I'm not trying to discredit MJM's contribution,
> just
> > trying to improve it--no 
> > more bad jokes or misspelled words.
> > 
> > Fred
> > 
> > In a message dated 12/2/03 11:46:10 AM Eastern
> > Standard Time, 
> > rhodes2282 at yahoo.com writes:
> > 
> > > Good one, Rik:-)  Hope you had a good
> > Thanksgiving. 
> > > Your right on the money here.  Beside, I have
> > gotten
> > > use to hearing Roger scouting trip, Rummy-I
> talked
> > to
> > > him about everything &Michael &I have been
> > toushing
> > > cannon balls back &forth since the beginning of
> > this
> > > list.  I remember when the list first got
> started;
> > > there were only a handful of us on the list.  It
> > sure
> > > was boring till it finally built up to around
> 100
> > > members.  Now we have a little community.  The
> > list is
> > > good the way we have it.  And like you said, if
> > > someone has a question; someone will come up
> with
> > the
> > > answer.  Believe me; we have talked about it
> > all!!!!
> > > Steve
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- Rik Sandberg <sanderico at earthlink.net>
> wrote:
> > > >To all on the list,
> > > >
> > > >The thing I find most interesting about these
> > on/off
> > > >topic discussions is: 
> > > >Those that are constantly complaining about the
> > > >topic, very rarely post a 
> > > >boating question. If we all sat around waiting
> > for
> > > >most of these folks to say 
> > > >something, there would be nothing here but
> > > >emptiness. AND no point in coming 
> > > >here.
> > > >
> > > >So, all you "topic police", if you want someone
> > to
> > > >be here to answer your 
> > > >questions when you finally come up with one,
> you
> > > >might consider not asking 
> > > >that all the veteran owner/sailors be bored to
> > tears
> > > >while they wait. If you 
> > > >are going to insist on the boredom, soon there
> > will
> > > >be no one here to help 
> > > >you.
> > > >
> > > >If you have a boating question, then post it.
> > > >Everyone here is more than 
> > > >happy to talk about boats and will help however
> > they
> > > >can if someone will just 
> > > >post the question. But, it seems you very
> rarely
> > > >hear from the "topic police" 
> > > >except when they decide it's time to bitch
> about
> > the
> > > >topics. Then it seems 
> > > >they have lots to say. I wonder, are topic
> > > >discussions considered "boat 
> > > >related"???
> > > >
> > > >Rik
> > > >
> > > >On 12/01/2003 01:17 pm, you wrote:
> > > >>Todd,
> > > >>
> > > >>While agreeing with much of what you had to
> say,
> > > >you should be aware that
> > > >>when the charter was adopted it was done
> > extremely
> > > >democratically.  There
> > > >>were probably 100+ of us on the list at the
> > time,
> > > >and we worked quite hard
> > > >>on the charter.  Michael did not impose it,
> and
> > > >has accepted every
> > > >>modification.
> > > >>
> > > >>Fred,
> > > >>
> > > >>While agreeing with much of what you had to
> say,
> > > >and having taken a similar
> > > >>position in the past, I think it has become
> > > >obvious over time that the only
> > > >>way to hold the attention of the experienced
> > list
> > > >members who provide most
> > > >>of the answers is to allow them to chat
> > off-topic.
> > > >>
> > > >>Bill Effros
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>----- Original Message -----
> > > >>From: Todd Tavares
> > > >>To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
> > > >>Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 1:53 PM
> > > >>Subject: Re: [ham] Re: [Rhodes22-list]
> Politics
> > on
> > > >the list. my .01
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>Fred,
> > > >>
> > > >>   I am probably way out of my place here, but
> > > >being on the receiving end
> > > >>of MJM's wrath, all the while ignorant of the
> > > >content and make up of this
> > > >>list here;  This is basically Michael's list
> > (and
> > > >others).  We exist here
> > > >>because of the time, patience, energy, and
> money
> > > >Micheal (and a few
> > > >>others?)spend to administrate this list-serv.
> > > >>
> > > >>  Michael has a life and a family, and
> probably
> > > >much more imortant things
> > > >>to do with his time.  He choses to run this
> list
> > > >server for his and all of
> > > >>our pleasure and enjoyment.  Michael has given
> > me
> > > >the "take you computer
> > > >>and go down the road speech" before; and
> that's
> > > >putting it mildly.  While
> > > >>this list does have a charter, it is still the
> > > >creation of MJM and not a
> > > >>democracy.  If MJM has the stomach to put up
> > with
> > > >my nonsense, then he (and
> > > >>all here) have the patience of saints.
> > > >>
> > > >>  So as far as the procedures for adopting,
> > > >recalling and amending the
> > > >>charter?  I don't thinks Robert's Rules apply
> > > >here, but i may be wrong :-)
> > > >>
> > > >>Thanks All,
> > > >>
> > > >>Todd
> > > >>  Not a sermon.....just a thought.
> > >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> > > >Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> > > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > 
> > > 
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
> > > http://companion.yahoo.com/
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > 
> > > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> www.rhodes22.org/list
> 
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
> http://companion.yahoo.com/
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
www.rhodes22.org/list


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/

More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list