[Rhodes22-list] (no subject)
Mark Kaynor
mark@kaynor.org
Wed, 12 Feb 2003 15:12:31 -0500 (EST)
.ear> <5.2.0.9.0.20030212133155.00ad5960@pop.earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] (no subject)
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 15:11:27 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Rik,
I meant "While you were searching for a transportable boat, did you look at
the Nor'Sea as a possibility?".
I figured w/ your truck and experience actually transporting it wouldn't be
the issue for you.
Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rik Sandberg" <sanderico@earthlink.net>
To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 3:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] (no subject)
> Mark,
>
> Sure, why not??? I have a truck now and I have had others in the past that
> would easily tow, either the Flicka or the Nor-Sea. The beam is about the
> same on both, about 8 feet, although the Nor-Sea is a couple thousand
> pounds heavier than the Flicka. Draft is even within a couple inches of
the
> same.
>
> Towing these boats is really pretty much a non-issue for me. Any of them
> are far smaller than the race trailers I have towed all over the upper
> midwest for the last 17 years years and about 180,000 miles or so. And, I
> do make my living in the trucking business, so I have a lot (about 28
> years) of experience with even bigger outfits than this. The biggest race
> trailer I had a few years back, would make almost two of the Nor-Seas. 32
> foot box (36 ft overall) Tri-axle. Gross weight (loaded) about 15,000,
> about 27,500 counting the truck, 8'6" wide and 12' High. Truck and trailer
> were about 64 feet long overall. After you drive something like that
around
> for a while, towing boats doesn't seem like such a big deal anymore. Boats
> tow very easily in comparison.
>
> Rik
>
>
> At 01:47 PM 2/12/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> >thlink.net <001501c2d2c7$a5c23bd0$6501a8c0@rik>
> >Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Re: Flicka
> >Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:46:08 -0500
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Content-Type: text/plain;
> > charset="iso-8859-1"
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >X-Priority: 3
> >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
> >X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
> >
> >Rik,
> >
> >Did you look at the Nor'Sea as a "transportable"?
> >
> >Mark
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Rik Sandberg" <sanderico@earthlink.net>
> >To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org>
> >Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:50 PM
> >Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Re: Flicka
> >
> >
> > > George,
> > >
> > > Worry not....... Already had a bigger truck. And if that one isn't big
> > > enough I've got some bigger ones than that too. I could haul a Halberg
> > > Rassey 42 if I had to. Not likely though, the Flicka was spendy
enough.
> > >
> > > I don't really think of the Flicka a trailerable, more like
transportable.
> > > Ramp launching and retrieving in the same day isn't going to happen
like
> >it
> > > does with the R22. The Flicka will live in the water for a while once
it's
> > > in there. But yes, the additional living space is the reason for
having
> >it.
> > > Hope to have some extended stays down south in the winters ahead.
> > >
> > > Rik
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "George Stecyk" <GeorgeS@af.tv>
> > > To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:32 AM
> > > Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Re: Flicka
> > >
> > >
> > > > Rik,
> > > > Saw the thead regarding your new (to you) Flicka, and saw your
pictures
> >in
> > > > Chicago - great boat, I know someone who owned, sailed and lived on
one
> >on
> > > > the east coast.
> > > > But trailerable??? You may need a bigger truck!
> > > > George
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Rik Sandberg" <sanderico@earthlink.net>
> > > > To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:38 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [ham] Re: [Rhodes22-list] Quiet
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Michael,
> > > > >
> > > > > Nah, No thanks. Won't be needing that either.
> > > > >
> > > > > Rik
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > At 11:33 PM 2/11/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> > > > > >Ric, I am sure we still have the large supply of opium around
for
> >bomb
> > > > > >"survivors"(cold war leftovers), otherwise know as the
> > > > > >walking dead. this is for the down range people, my wife still
tells
> > > the
> > > > > >story of riding out cernoble<sp> living in Germany.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >MJM
> > > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > > >From: "Rik Sandberg" <sanderico@earthlink.net>
> > > > > >To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org>
> > > > > >Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:11 PM
> > > > > >Subject: Re: [ham] Re: [Rhodes22-list] Quiet
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Michael,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Well, I guess I would thank them for their concern and ask
that
> >they
> > > > give
> > > > > > > their stuff to someone who needs it worse than I do. I think
if
> >the
> > > > nuke
> > > > > > > lands close enough that the radiation is going to be a
problem, I
> > > > would
> > > > > > > probably have a hell of a lot more to worry about than my
thyroid.
> > > > 'Course,
> > > > > > > maybe that's just me.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Rik
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > At 10:32 PM 2/11/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> > > > > > > >to use a bad paraphrase "if you have the question you will
never
> > > > > > > >understand the paranoia", Had to sign a permission slip this
week
> > > > > > > >for the school to give out iodide tables to the kids in case
of
> >an
> > > > > > > >emergency(not kidding). The heath district is handing out a
30
> > > > > > > >day supply to each household
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >And to save the next question, prevents the thyroid from
> >adsorbing
> > > > > > radiation
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >MJM
> > > > > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > >From: "Rik Sandberg" <sanderico@earthlink.net>
> > > > > > > >To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org>
> > > > > > > >Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:45 PM
> > > > > > > >Subject: Re: [ham] Re: [Rhodes22-list] Quiet
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Michael,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Makes me glad I live out here in the middle. Seems like
there
> >is
> > > > > > way too
> > > > > > > > > much paranoia out on the ends. Seal the windows from
what????
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Rik
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > At 09:13 PM 2/11/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >waiting for the end of the current threat level, the
stright
> > > > > > answer is to
> > > > > > > > > >"protect me", BTW thier was a run on ducttape in DC, to
> > > > > > > > > >seal the windows.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >MJM
> > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > > >From: "Rik Sandberg" <sanderico@earthlink.net>
> > > > > > > > > >To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list"
<rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org>
> > > > > > > > > >Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:18 PM
> > > > > > > > > >Subject: Re: [ham] Re: [Rhodes22-list] Quiet
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Michael,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > So, just what is it these troops are doing in downtown
NY,
> > > in
> > > > full
> > > > > > > > combat
> > > > > > > > > > > gear???
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Rik
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > At 08:55 PM 2/11/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >well I have been spending the days getting up-close
and
> > > > > > personal with
> > > > > > > > > > > >troops in full combat gear, great fun downtown NY and
> > > passing
> > > > > > > > > > > >thought grand central, give me a real safe feeling
(not)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >MJM
> > > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Rik Sandberg" <sanderico@earthlink.net>
> > > > > > > > > > > >To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list"
> ><rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > >Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 8:34 PM
> > > > > > > > > > > >Subject: [ham] Re: [Rhodes22-list] Quiet
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, It's up. Maybe we should have a political
> > > discussion
> > > > or
> > > > > > > > > > something :-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > :-) It ain't near so quiet then.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Anybody heard any good parables lately????
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Rik
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > At 08:13 PM 2/11/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hey, it is awful quiet out there. Is the list
up?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >_________________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help?
> > > > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help?
> > > > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >_________________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > >Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help?
> >www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help?
> >www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >_________________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > >Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help?
www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help?
www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >_________________________________________________
> > > > > > > >Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _________________________________________________
> > > > > > > Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >_________________________________________________
> > > > > >Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > >
> > > > > _________________________________________________
> > > > > Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _________________________________________________
> > > > Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________
> > > Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> >
> >_________________________________________________
> >Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>
> _________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list