[Rhodes22-list] Rebuilding Iraq was State of the Union
bberner@optonline.net
bberner@optonline.net
Thu, 30 Jan 2003 12:29:11 -0500
Of course though, being an atheist, opposed to pretty much all forms
of organised religion (though not spirituality), I do have to take
exception to your use of the phrase "year of our lord".
BB
Bill Berner
v: 914.478.2896
f: 914.478.3856
e: BBerner@optonline.net
----- Original Message -----
From: brad haslett <flybrad@yahoo.com>
Date: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:25 am
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Rebuilding Iraq was State of the Union
> Mark your calendars! On this day, January 30, year of
> our Lord, 2003, I find myself in agreement with Bill
> Berner on something. This is surely a sign from the
> heavens; the end is near!
>
> Bill is right, we'll have to stay in Iraq for a long
> time to achieve any lasting, positive effect on the
> region. For and indepth article on the subject read
> James Fallows, "The Firty-First State", Atlantic
> Monthly, NOV 2002.
> http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2002/11/fallows.htm
>
> For the record I regretfully accept that taking out
> Saddam is a necessity. Every trip to China I am
> saddened that FDR and Truman didn't listen to General
> Stillwell and force a two party system there after
> WW2. The USA has a historical record of "fighting the
> good fight" and then not following up with the long
> term commitment necessary for lasting peace. We did
> it in Japan and Germany, we'll have to do it again in
> the Middle East. Truman was able to fund the Marshall
> Plan during a sagging post war economy. Our challenge
> will be no less.
>
> Brad Haslett
> --- bberner@optonline.net wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Alex -
> >
> >
> > I cnouldn't disagree with you more on getting out
> > of Iraq as soon as
> > the war is over.
> >
> > For the record - I am against a war on Iraq at
> > this time. However,
> > based on the SOTU speech, it seems like a pretty
> > sure thing.
> >
> > At any rate, if the US or some coalition wer eto
> > go in, remove Saddam
> > and some generals, and then pack up and leave,
> > there would be chaos.
> > Tribal fighting and genocide would surely result.
> > Now that's a
> > scenario that is ripe for increasing religous
> > fundamentalism, hatrred
> > of the US, and increased terorism
> >
> > On the other hand, a major long term benefit of
> > getting rid of Hussein
> > is the chance to try to enable a democracy to
> > grow and take hold in
> > Iraq, that might spread to Saudi Arabia and
> > Kuwait. The way this
> > could occur, admittedsly over many years, is that
> > democracy in Iraq
> > would lead to greater education, equal rights,
> > and the resulting
> > increase in economic opportunity for a large part
> > of the population.
> > Citizens of other Arab countries, witnessing
> > this, would press for
> > democratization in their own countries.
> >
> > The final benefit would be a depowering of
> > religous fundamentalist
> > extremists, and lessening the likelihood of
> > terrorism in western
> > countries.
> >
> > Short sighted foreign policy has been a major
> > contributor to the mess
> > we find ourselves in today with both our enemies
> > (at least this
> > decade) and allies. Your prescrikption to kick
> > soime Iraqi ass and
> > get the hell out, would only add perpetuate the
> > problem and add fuel
> > to the terrorist fire.
> >
> > BB
> > Bill Berner
> > v: 914.478.2896
> > f: 914.478.3856
> > e: BBerner@optonline.net
> > _________________________________________________
> > Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help?
> www.rhodes22.org/list
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> _________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list@rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>