[Rhodes22-list] what about Libya?

[Bill Effros]

Wow!  Michael--that's quite a stretch!

The United States has long maintained the position that Qaddafi is Saddam and Osama rolled into one person.  He personified state supported terror.  We blamed him for the attack on Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics, the Rome attack at the El Al airport counter, the Pan Am bombing over Scotland, the bombing of a French airplane over Africa, the bombing of American servicemen at a cafe in Germany, killing his own people, the list goes on and on.

For 10 years he has been trying to buy his way back into the international community by admitting he did some of these acts, paying reparations (in the billions of dollars) to family members, apologizing to anyone who would listen.  The British have been negotiating with him for years.  

His nuclear program was a bunch of unopened boxes shipped from our ally, Pakistan--missing parts--which his own scientists would never have been able to make work.

And now you want to give the current President credit for wrapping up the whole mess in a few weeks, and you want to call this "an easy one".

If Osama and Saddam had given us a few bucks, and Bill Clinton had accepted them, would you have congratulated him for solving the problem?  I don't think so. 

For the historically inclined, below are President Reagan's remarks to the nation on April 14, 1986 regarding his pre-emptive strike on Libya.  If Mr. Reagan were healthy today, I'm sure he would have something to say about the "quick" and "easy" solution claimed by you and the current administration.

Instead I can only quote from President Reagan's remarks:  "There is no security, no safety, in the appeasement of evil. It must be the core of Western policy that there be no sanctuary for terror."
 
Bill Effros


President Reagan's Televised Remarks to the Nation--April 14, 1986: 

My fellow Americans, at 7 o'clock this evening Eastern time, air and naval forces of the United States launched a series of strikes against the headquarters, terrorist facilities and military assets that support Muammar Qaddafi's subversive activities.

The attacks were concentrated and carefully targeted to minimize casualties among the Libyan people, with whom we have no quarrel.


>From initial reports, our forces have succeeded in their mission. Several weeks ago, in New Orleans, I warned Colonel Qaddafi we would hold his regime accountable for any new terrorist attacks launched against American citizens. More recently, I made it clear we would respond as soon as we determined conclusively who was responsible for such attacks.


On April 5 in West Berlin a terrorist bomb exploded in a nightclub frequented by American servicemen. Sgt. Kenneth Ford and a young Turkish woman were killed and 230 others were wounded, among them some 50 American military personnel.


This monstrous brutality is but the latest act in Colonel Qaddafi's reign of terror. The evidence is now conclusive that the terrorist bombing of La Belle discotheque was planned and executed under the direct orders of the Libyan regime.


On March 25, more than a week before the attack, orders were sent from Tripoli to the Libyan People's Bureau in East Berlin to conduct a terrorist attack against Americans, to cause maximum and indiscriminate casualties. Libya's agents then planted the bomb.


On April 4, the People's Bureau alerted Tripoli that the attack would be carried out the following morning. The next day they reported back to Tripoli on the great success of their mission.


Our evidence is direct, it is precise, it is irrefutable. We have solid evidence about other attacks Qaddafi has planned against the United States' installations and diplomats and even American tourists.


Thanks to close cooperation with our friends, some of these have been prevented. With the help of French authorities, we recently aborted one such attack: a planned massacre, using grenades and small arms, of civilians waiting in lines for visas at an American Embassy.


Colonel Qaddafi is not only an enemy of the United States. His record of subversion and aggression against the neighboring states in Africa is well documented and well known. He has ordered the murder of fellow Libyans in countless countries. He has sanctioned acts of terror in Africa, Europe and the Middle East, as well as the Western Hemisphere. Today we have done what we had to do. If necessary, we shall do it again. It gives me no pleasure to say that, and I wish it were otherwise. Before Qaddafi seized power in 1969, the people of Libya had been friends of the United States, and I'm sure that today most Libyans are ashamed and disgusted that this man has made their country a synonym for barbarism around the world.


The Libyan people are a decent people caught in the grip of a tyrant.


To our friends and allies in Europe who cooperated in today's mission, I would only say you have the primary gratitude of the American people. Europeans who remember history understand better than most that there is no security, no safety, in the appeasement of evil. It must be the core of Western policy that there be no sanctuary for terror, and to sustain such a policy, free men and free nations must unite and work together.


Sometimes it is said that by imposing sanctions against Colonel Qaddafi or by striking at his terrorist installations, we only magnify the man's importance - that the proper way to deal with him is to ignore him. I do not agree. Long before I came into this office, Colonel Qaddafi had engaged in acts of international terror - acts that put him outside the company of civilized men. For years, however, he suffered no economic, or political or military sanction, and the atrocities mounted in number, as did the innocent dead and wounded.


And for us to ignore, by inaction, the slaughter of American civilians and American soldiers, whether in nightclubs or airline terminals, is simply not in the American tradition. When our citizens are abused or attacked anywhere in the world, on the direct orders of a hostile regime, we will respond, so long as I'm in this Oval Office. Self-defense is not only our right, it is our duty. It is the purpose behind the mission undertaken tonight - a mission fully consistent with Article 51 of the United Nations Charter.


We believe that this pre-emptive action against his terrorist installations will not only diminish Colonel Qaddafi's capacity to export terror -it will provide him with incentives and reasons to alter his criminal behavior. I have no illusion that tonight's action will bring down the curtain on Qaddafi's reign of terror, but this mission, violent though it was, can bring closer a safer and more secure world for decent men and women. We will persevere.


This afternoon we consulted with the leaders of Congress regarding what we were about to do and why. Tonight, I salute the skill and professionalism of the men and women of our armed forces who carried out this mission. It's an honor to be your Commander in Chief.


We Americans are slow to anger. We always seek peaceful avenues before resorting to the use of force, and we did. We tried quiet diplomacy, public condemnation, economic sanctions and demonstrations of military force - none succeeded. Despite our repeated warnings, Qaddafi continued his reckless policy of intimidation, his relentless pursuit of terror.


He counted on America to be passive. He counted wrong. I warned that there should be no place on earth where terrorists can rest and train and practice their deadly skills. I meant it. I said that we would act with others if possible and alone if necessary to insure that terrorists have no sanctuary anywhere.


Tonight we have. Thank you, and God bless you.



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Michael Meltzer 
  To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org 
  Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 10:19 PM
  Subject: [Rhodes22-list] what about Libya?


  what about Libya, that a case where we got both nukes, chemicals and  cooperation from a guy who not above being a terrorist himself. Most helpful he gave up his sources permitting the pipeline knowledge to be plugged and some merchants to quietly disappear. now he have sanctions from the pan-am days. I still remember the William Safire op-ed explaining why we would have to give him a first nuke strike to take out his chemical plants. After Iraq he does a about face, I think it was related. He was grade "a" meat for who next and Paranoid(getting bombed does that :-). Like in my own job, people forget the easly ones.



  MJM
  __________________________________________________
  Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list