[Rhodes22-list] might be boat less - needs detailed clarification!

[Kroposki]

	I presume this was sent by Will Barry?  Since it is not signed,
I am just guessing.  I thought that you bought the Hunter already?  Are
you saying that you also have a seaward 32?  A Compac 27?  Will the real
boat please fly its colors!
	A Compac 27 is not technically considered trailerable.  How did
it get into this mix?  Nevertheless, it is trailerable, albeit over
width, can be trailered with permits on the interstate.  Since you guys
usually have more than one able person to step the mast, it is feasible.
While not known for speed or sail ability, they have a good reputation
for quality and durability.  
	Hey, why don't you go thru the motions to the list of a detailed
comparison of the pros and cons of each.
             Ed K

-----Original Message-----
From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
[mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of William P.
Barry, III
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 10:51 PM
To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] I might be boat less

We have a New 2002 Hunter 326 in Charleston, a 98 Seaward 32, the new 26
RK,
and the Compac 27??? DECISIONS ARE ROUGH!!!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Meltzer" <mjm at michaelmeltzer.com>
To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 10:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] I might be boat less


> so what are you doing?
>
> MJM
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "William P. Barry, III" <wp.barry at att.net>
> To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 10:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] I might be boat less
>
>
> > DITTO!
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Michael Meltzer" <mjm at michaelmeltzer.com>
> > To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 10:21 PM
> > Subject: [Rhodes22-list] I might be boat less
> >
> > > I might be boat less, what should I do?
> > >
> > > MJM