[Rhodes22-list] Mainsail slugs (was Mast Crane) (was Lou Moore)
Roger Pihlaja
cen09402 at centurytel.net
Sat Mar 20 01:05:26 EST 2004
Rik,
When I get Dynamic Equilibrium out of winter storage this year, I'll measure
the distance between the top slug & the bottom of the headboard. My
recollection is the distance is about 6", but I'm not sure. If you really
need that measurement ASAP, let me know & I'll make a special trip to the
Midland County Fairgrounds to visit the boat.
Roger Pihlaja
S/V Dynamic Equilbrium
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rik Sandberg" <sanderico at earthlink.net>
To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Mainsail slugs (was Mast Crane) (was Lou Moore)
> Roger,
>
> Sorry, I didn't know. I've never had a standard mainsail before, on
anything
> bigger than my Fatty Knees (no headboard).
>
> I kinda have to wonder why people who make sails wouldn't know this. Seems
> like Steve said that a sailmaker had made his friend's sail. My Flicka
came
> to me with this slug on the headboard. I never liked the way it looked,
but
> it was there and I kinda had to assume that the sailmaker who put it there
> must have known something.
>
> I know better now. But, that still doesn't answer the question, how far
below
> the headboard should the top slug be?
>
> Sometimes I'm tempted to just go back to using the boltrope.
>
> Rik
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 19 2004 05:39 pm, Roger Pihlaja wrote:
> > Oh brother, problem solved! The reason you don't put a slug on the
> > headboard is that the headboard is rigid. The system needs the slight
flex
> > of the cloth sails in order not to bind up as the length of halyard is
> > reduced as the mainsail is hoisted up the mast. It's sort of the
> > "universal joint" in the system & putting a slug on the headboard took
all
> > the flexibility out. Never put a slug on the headboard.
> >
> > Roger Pihlaja
> > S/V Dynamic Equilibrium
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Rik Sandberg" <sanderico at earthlink.net>
> > To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 4:34 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Mainsail slugs (was Mast Crane) (was Lou
> > Moore)
> >
> > > Steve,
> > >
> > > Hmmm....don't need a slug on the headboard.....I too had (key word
had) a
> > > slug on the headboard of the mainsail on my Flicka. It wore out and
broke
> > > when we were down at Kentucky Lake last fall. the other slugs seem to
be
> > > fine. I was wondering how to go about replacing it, but if this is
right,
> >
> > I
> >
> > > shouldn't have to.
> > >
> > > Can you explain why a slug isn't needed on the headboard?? It seems
> >
> > there's
> >
> > > a lot of new stuff to learn when you go from a IMF main to a standard
> > > main
> > >
> > :-)
> > :
> > > Rik
> > >
> > > At 01:49 PM 3/19/2004, you wrote:
> > > >Lloyd
> > > >The slug in the headboard was the problem. Didn't
> > > >need one there.
> > > >Steve
> > > >
> > > >--- Lloyd Crowther <lcrowther at cox.net> wrote:
> > > > > Roger,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the prompt reply. My problem was more
> > > > > that I couldn't get my
> > > > > Main all the way up rather than I couldn't get it
> > > > > down. Before I had the
> > > > > 7/16" plastic, cylindrical slugs sewn onto grommets
> > > > > the sail maker later
> > > > > placed aft of the bolt rope along the mainsail's
> > > > > luff, I tied a slug to my
> > > > > halyard, tied a string to the lower part of the slot
> > > > > on the slug to pull the
> > > > > slug back down, and hoisted it up, no problem. I
> > > > > took the sail to Quantum
> > > > > Sails Loft in Annapolis and asked them to put the
> > > > > slugs on. When I tried to
> > > > > raise the sail, the topmost slug would bind about
> > > > > 3/4 t0 7/8 of the way to
> > > > > the masthead no matter what I did, lubrication or
> > > > > any thing else. I never
> > > > > had any problem getting the sail back down because I
> > > > > did all this in my
> > > > > slip. I did take the precaution of looping a light
> > > > > line through the bottoms
> > > > > of the slug slots so if they twisted I could pull on
> > > > > the line to re-tension
> > > > > any slug that twisted.
> > > > >
> > > > > I just went down to the cellar and measured the
> > > > > spacing of the grommets they
> > > > > put along the luff (I cut the slugs off when I
> > > > > abandoned the whole exercise
> > > > > last spring) and found they were 18" on centers. So
> > > > > I guess you have solved
> > > > > some if not all of my problem although I doubt that
> > > > > I pay all that money
> > > > > again to prove you right.
> > > > >
> > > > > My thought was that as the sail got nearer the
> > > > > pulley in the mast. the
> > > > > halyard tended to pull the headboard, with its
> > > > > sewed-on slug, in towards the
> > > > > mast, relieving the pressure on that slug and
> > > > > allowing it to twist and bind.
> > > > > In any event, thank you again for your rapid and
> > > > > responsive reply, your
> > > > > knowledge continues to amaze me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Lloyd
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Roger Pihlaja" <cen09402 at centurytel.net>
> > > > > To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list"
> > > > > <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > > > > Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 5:45 AM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Mast Crane (was Lou
> > > > > Moore)
> > > > >
> > > > > > Lloyd,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I used 7/16" dia. cylindrical plastic sail slugs
> > > > >
> > > > > on the luff and a 7/16"
> > > > >
> > > > > > dia. bolt rope on the foot. Note: There are two
> > > > >
> > > > > styles of sail slugs in
> > > > >
> > > > > > common use, T-shaped & cylindrical shaped. Each
> > > > >
> > > > > style is designed to be
> > > > >
> > > > > > used with the cooresponding slot shape on a mast
> > > > >
> > > > > and they are not
> > > > >
> > > > > > interchangable. On Dynamic Equilibrium, the
> > > > >
> > > > > cylindrical style of sail
> > > > > slug
> > > > >
> > > > > > matched the configuration of the extruded slot on
> > > > >
> > > > > the mast. If a bolt
> > > > > rope
> > > > >
> > > > > > works well in your mast slot; then, I would expect
> > > > >
> > > > > the cylindrical style
> > > > >
> > > > > > sail slugs are the correct ones for your mast as
> > > > >
> > > > > well. However, I would
> > > > >
> > > > > > check to be certain. 7/16" dia cylindrical sail
> > > > >
> > > > > slugs are the same size
> > > > > as
> > > > >
> > > > > > came on the OEM standard sail.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here's a couple of tips you might try on the mast
> > > > >
> > > > > groove:
> > > > > > Take a rag & moisten it with a good silicone
> > > > >
> > > > > lubricant like Dow Corning
> > > > >
> > > > > > Slipicone. Run the oily rag up & down the length
> > > > >
> > > > > of the slot. The
> > > > >
> > > > > > Slipicone will remove any accumulated crud that's
> > > > >
> > > > > built up in the slot,
> > > > > plus
> > > > >
> > > > > > it will also leave behind a silicone wax finish
> > > > >
> > > > > that is much more slippery
> > > > >
> > > > > > than the bare anodized aluminum finish. Do the
> > > > >
> > > > > same thing with the
> > > > > plastic
> > > > >
> > > > > > slugs on the mainsail. NOTE: Dispose of this oily
> > > > >
> > > > > rag by immediately
> > > > >
> > > > > > burning it OR soak it in water, put it in a
> > > > >
> > > > > plastic bag, & put it out with
> > > > >
> > > > > > this week's trash. NEVER just leave it sitting
> > > > >
> > > > > around or it may
> > > > >
> > > > > > spontaneously ignite & start a fire. I usually do
> > > > >
> > > > > this maintenance on the
> > > > >
> > > > > > mast slot at the beginning of the sailing season.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > While you are wiping down the slot, take special
> > > > >
> > > > > note of the location on
> > > > > the
> > > > >
> > > > > > mast if you feel any rough spots, dents, or burrs.
> > > > >
> > > > > Go back and carefully
> > > > >
> > > > > > inspect those spots. A dent or burr on the inside
> > > > >
> > > > > surface of the slot can
> > > > >
> > > > > > cause the bolt rope or sail slides to hang up. A
> > > > >
> > > > > minor dent or burr can
> > > > > be
> > > > >
> > > > > > smoothed with 400 grit emery cloth. A rough spot
> > > > >
> > > > > is quite often a
> > > > > build-up
> > > > >
> > > > > > of something like tree sap or bird droppings,
> > > > >
> > > > > which can be removed with a
> > > > >
> > > > > > product like Formula 409. One year, I even
> > > > >
> > > > > discovered a mud dauber wasp
> > > > >
> > > > > > nest in the slot! I was relieved to find the wasp
> > > > >
> > > > > nest because something
> > > > >
> > > > > > was absolutely jamming the mainsail at that point
> > > > >
> > > > > on the mast. I was
> > > > > afraid
> > > > >
> > > > > > it was something really serious.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > While you are wiping down the sail slugs, take
> > > > >
> > > > > note if any of them are
> > > > >
> > > > > > damaged or have rough spots on them. Repair or
> > > > >
> > > > > replace as required.
> > > > >
> > > > > > After cleaning out the mast slot, take one of your
> > > > >
> > > > > sail slugs & run it up
> > > > > &
> > > > >
> > > > > > down the length of the slot on the mast. It
> > > > >
> > > > > should move freely with no
> > > > >
> > > > > > binding anywhere. It's possible the gap width on
> > > > >
> > > > > the slot on your mast
> > > > > has
> > > > >
> > > > > > a "tight spot" wherein the gap width is off spec
> > > > >
> > > > > too narrow. This
> > > > > condition
> > > > >
> > > > > > can be repaired by forcing a wooden wedge into the
> > > > >
> > > > > slot in the narrow
> > > > > areas
> > > > >
> > > > > > to widen the gap. Depending upon the length of
> > > > >
> > > > > the narrow slot region,
> > > > > you
> > > > >
> > > > > > might have to custom make this wedge to fit your
> > > > >
> > > > > situation.
> > > > >
> > > > > > It's also possible that the sail slugs on the sail
> > > > >
> > > > > you tried were spaced
> > > > > too
> > > > >
> > > > > > far apart. The sail slugs need to be spaced no
> > > > >
> > > > > more than about 12" apart
> > > > > on
> > > > >
> > > > > > center, or they tend to get cocked and bind up in
> > > > >
> > > > > the slot. Also, the
> > > > > tiny
> > > > >
> > > > > > shackles that attach the sail slugs to the luff on
> > > > >
> > > > > the mainsail must be
> > > > > the
> > > > >
> > > > > > proper size. If they are too short, the luff will
> > > > >
> > > > > bind on the trailing
> > > > > edge
> > > > >
> > > > > > of the slot. If they are too long, they may allow
> > > > >
> > > > > the sail slug to become
> > > > >
> > > > > > cocked in the slot & bind up.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Finally, I'm sure you already know this; but, I'll
> > > > >
> > > > > just mention it for the
> > > > >
> > > > > > sake of completeness. No mainsail will drop down
> > > > >
> > > > > the mast easily if the
> > > > >
> > > > > > sail is under load. This means the boat must be
> > > > >
> > > > > head to the wind, the
> > > > > boom
> > > > >
> > > > > > must be centered, with the boom topping lift
> > > > >
> > > > > supporting the weight of the
> > > > >
> > > > > > boom.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If none of this works for you Lyoyd; then, I'm at
> > > > >
> > > > > a loss to explain why
> > > > > your
> > > > >
> > > > > > mainsail won't fall down the mast when the halyard
> > > > >
> > > > > is released.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Roger Pihlaja
> > > > > > S/V Dynamic Equilibrium
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: "Lloyd Crowther" <lcrowther at cox.net>
> > > > > > To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list"
> > > > >
> > > > > <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 1:27 AM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Mast Crane (was Lou
> > > > >
> > > > > Moore)
> > > > >
> > > > > > > Roger,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What size sail slugs do you use? I tried 7/16"
> > > > >
> > > > > plastic sail slugs and
> > > > >
> > > > > > > couldn't even get the sail all the way up
> > > > >
> > > > > without it binding. Don't
> > > > > have
> > > > >
> > > > > > > any trouble with raising it with the bolt rope
> > > > >
> > > > > but it is a bear to
> > > > > furl
> > > > >
> > > > > > if
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > your a single-hander.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Lloyd
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: "Roger Pihlaja" <cen09402 at centurytel.net>
> > > > > > > To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list"
> > > > >
> > > > > <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 11:35 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Mast Crane (was Lou
> > > > >
> > > > > Moore)
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > Peter,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I modified the standard masthead with some
> > > > >
> > > > > aluminum bar stock & a MIG
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > welder.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Look on the FAQ page for the tension settings.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The way to measure maximum chord inches is to
> > > > >
> > > > > first load up the rig
> > > > > with
> > > > >
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > backstays. Then, run the main halyard down to
> > > > >
> > > > > the base of the mast &
> > > > >
> > > > > > tie
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > it
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > off taut against the slot on the aft face.
> > > > >
> > > > > Then, using a bosun's
> > > > > chair
> > > > >
> > > > > > or
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > step ladder to get up high enough on the mast,
> > > > >
> > > > > measure the maximum
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > chord-inches from the halyard to the slot on
> > > > >
> > > > > the mast.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > Note: If all you want to do is eliminate the
> > > > >
> > > > > headstay sag, the
> > > > > standard
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > backstay adjuster with the standard masthead
> > > > >
> > > > > geometry will do that.
> > > > > The
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > only real reason for the crane is to create
> > > > >
> > > > > clearance between the
> > > > >
> > > > > > > backstays
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > and the big roach of a fully battened
> > > > >
> > > > > mainsail. You also need to be a
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > little conservative re the amount of roach in
> > > > >
> > > > > the mainsail. Designing
> > > > >
> > > > > > in
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > too much roach will disrupt the balance of the
> > > > >
> > > > > sail plan by shifting
> > > > > the
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > center of effort (CE) aft, thus causing an
> > > > >
> > > > > excessive amount of weather
> > > > >
> > > > > > > helm.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Some of this weather helm can be dialed back
> > > > >
> > > > > out by adjusting the
> > > > > static
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > tilt of the mast such that the mast leans
> > > > >
> > > > > forward slightly, thus
> > > > > moving
> > > > >
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > CE of the rig forward. The static tilt of the
> > > > >
> > > > > mast is adjusted with
> > > > > the
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > turnbuckle on the forestay or by shortening
> > > > >
> > > > > the forestay cable.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > After having installed both a high tech
> > > > >
> > > > > composite genoa on a Harken
> > > > >
> > > > > > roller
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > furler & a fully battened mainsail, I'd say
> > > > >
> > > > > the genoa returns the
> > > > >
> > > > > > biggest
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > performance bang for the buck. But, the fully
> > > > >
> > > > > battened mainsail looks
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > totally cool when hoisted & the sail shape is
> > > > >
> > > > > much easier to adjust to
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > exactly what you want for the prevailing
> > > > >
> > > > > conditions & point of sail.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > You will have a choice between sail slugs and
> > > > >
> > > > > a bolt rope on the luff.
> > > > >
> > > > > > I
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > choose sail slugs & my mainsail almost falls
> > > > >
> > > > > down the mast when the
> > > > >
> > > > > > > halyard
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > is released. Reefing it under load sometimes
> > > > >
> > > > > requires the sail be
> > > > >
> > > > > > hauled
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > down; but, that was true with the partially
> > > > >
> > > > > battened mainsail as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > You
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > will have a choice between loose footed &
> > > > >
> > > > > footed using a bolt rope. I
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > choose a bolt rope on the foot, mainly because
> > > > >
> > > > > that's what the
> > > > > standard
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > mainsail had. I would order the optional
> > > > >
> > > > > zippered shelf which will
> > > > >
> > > > > > allow
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > you to increase the fullness of the lower 1/3
> > > > >
> > > > > of the mainsail shape
> > > > > for
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > light air. You zip up the shelf to flatten
> > > > >
> > > > > the mainsail shape for
> > > > > heavy
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > air. After you've paid the big bucks for this
> > > > >
> > > > > fully battened
> > > > > mainsail,
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > definitely get a leech line & cleat. The
> > > > >
> > > > > primary function of the
> > > > > leech
> > > > >
> > > > > > > line
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > is to stop the trailing edge of the sail from
> > > > >
> > > > > fluttering as the air
> > > > > foil
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > sheds its trailing vortices. This fluttering
> > > > >
> > > > > subjects the sailcloth &
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > stitching in the leech to a lot of high
> > > > >
> > > > > frequency wear cycles, which
> > > > > can
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > result in premature fatigue failure of the
> > > > >
> > > > > material. You tighten the
> > > > >
> > > > > > > leech
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > line just enough to stop the fluttering.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thus, the leech line extends
> > > > >
> > > > > > the
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > life of your expensive new sail & is well
> > > > >
> > > > > worth the money up front to
> > > > >
> > > > > > have
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > it installed. You will have to specify the
> > > > >
> > > > > number of reef points in
> > > > >
> > > > > > your
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > new mainsail. I originally ordered just 1 set
> > > > >
> > > > > & later had a sailmaker
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > retrofit a 2nd set. The next time around, I
> > > > >
> > > > > will order two sets of
> > > > > reef
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > points. My 1st reef point reduces the
> > > > >
> > > > > mainsail area by 1/3 and the
> > > > >
> > > > > > second
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > reef point by 2/3 relative to the full
> > > > >
> > > > > mainsail area.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > Finally, this new fully battened mainsail will
> > > > >
> > > > > be substantially
> > > > > bulkier
> > > > >
> > > > > > > when
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > furled on the boom vs. the standard mainsail.
> > > > >
> > > > > The chances are, your
> > > > >
> > > > > > > current
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > mainsail cover will no longer fit. I modified
> > > > >
> > > > > my old mainsail cover
> > > > > to
> > > > >
> > > > > > > fit
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > the new sail.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Roger Pihlaja
> > > > > > > > S/V Dynamic Equilibrium
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > From: "Peter Thorn" <pthorn at nc.rr.com>
> > > > > > > > To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list"
> > > > >
> > > > > <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 5:21 PM
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Mast Crane (was
> > > > >
> > > > > Lou Moore)
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Roger,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I certainly will try it. It sounds great!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Where did you acquire your 12" mast crane?
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you recall Loos
> > > > >
> > > > > > settings
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > forwards, uppers and aft shrouds?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > With only 4 cord/inches upper mast bend, my
> > > > >
> > > > > guess is the greatest
> > > > >
> > > > > > > benefit
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > headsail luff sag adjustment. If you can
> > > > >
> > > > > obtain enough tension to
> > > > >
> > > > > > keep
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 150 Genoa close to zero cord/inches in a
> > > > >
> > > > > blow, you must be putting
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > 400-500
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > pounds on the headstay. R22 construction
> > > > >
> > > > > looks like it would take
> > > > >
> > > > > > > that.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Stan builds 'em beefy.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thinking out loud - 1) built the rig first,
> > > > >
> > > > > 2) measure/verify the
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > "reasonable mast bend" above the spreaders,
> > > > >
> > > > > 3) send numbers to
> > > > >
> > > > > > > sailmaker.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Can you think of anything else?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > PT
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Peter,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > With the forestay cable buried inside of
> > > > >
> > > > > the roller furling foil &
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > impossible to get at with a Loo's Tension
> > > > >
> > > > > gage, I've never
> > > > > measured
> > > > >
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > forestay tension. I have some calculated
> > > > >
> > > > > theoretical values; but,
> > > > >
> > > > > > > they
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > would only apply to my particular boat &
> > > > >
> > > > > masthead geometry &
> > > > >
> > > > > > wouldn't
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > much use to anyone else. When you refer
> > > > >
> > > > > to "chord-inches, I
> > > > > presume
> > > > >
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > mean the maximum perpendicular distance
> > > > >
> > > > > from the chord to the
> > > > > radius
> > > > >
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > curvature? Assuming my definition of
> > > > >
> > > > > chord-inch agrees with
> > > > > yours,
> > > > >
> > > > > > > with
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > range of adjustments on Dynamic
> > > > >
> > > > > Equilibrium as currently
> > > > > configured,
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > over
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > the 333-5/8 inch length of the forestay, I
> > > > >
> > > > > can adjust the
> > > > > chord-inch
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > value
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > from nearly 0 to about 6 inches. The
> > > > >
> > > > > aluminum extrusions on the
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > headsail
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > foils won't sag too much more than that
> > > > >
> > > > > without causing bearing
> > > > > and
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > furling
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > problems.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On my current fully battened mainsail, I
> > > > >
> > > > > went fairly conservative
> > > > > on
> > > > >
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > amount of mast bend the mainsail can
> > > > >
> > > > > respond to. It is currently
> > > > >
> > > > > > cut
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > respond to only about 2 chord-inches,
> > > > >
> > > > > mostly above the spreaders.
> > > > >
> > > > > > The
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > mast
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > curvature actually trails off
> > > > >
> > > > > asymptotically to 0 below the
> > > > >
> > > > > > spreaders
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > because of stretch in the lower sides
> > > > >
> > > > > stays and the differential
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > fore/aft
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > static load I put on the lower side stays.
> > > > >
> > > > > The forward lower side
> > > > >
> > > > > > > stays
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > adjusted tighter than the rear lower side
> > > > >
> > > > > stays to facilitate mast
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > bending.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I think the amount of mast bend could be
> > > > >
> > > > > increased to about 4
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > cord-inches
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > without any trouble. When the time comes
> > > > >
> > > > > to replace this
> > > > > mainsail,
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > that's
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > the spec I plan to ask for. With the
> > > > >
> > > > > current aluminum mast
> > > > >
> > > > > > extrusion,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > trying for more bend than about 4
> > > > >
> > > > > cord-inches is asking for
> > > > > trouble
> > > > >
> > > > > > in
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > my
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > engineering judgement. The aluminum
> > > > >
> > > > > extrusion might experience
> > > > >
> > > > > > > fatigue
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > failure (especially in a salt water
> > > > >
> > > > > environment) and the loads on
> > > > >
> > > > > > the
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > forestay & backstays would start to get a
> > > > >
> > > > > little high for the hull
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > structure
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > and chain plates.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > As you probably already know, you bend the
> > > > >
> > > > > mast to straighten the
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > forestay,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > thereby reducing headstay sag plus flatten
> > > > >
> > > > > the mainsail shape.
> > > > > Both
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > actions
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > depower the rig for heavy air. Yes,
> > > > >
> > > > > depowering the rig with the
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > backstay
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > adjuster is much faster than any other
> > > > >
> > > > > method because it takes
> > > > > care
> > > > >
> > > > > > of
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > both
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > sails at the same time. I have my
> > > > >
> > > > > backstay adjuster setup with a
> > > > >
> > > > > > > Harken
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 144
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > swivel cam base with 150 cam-matic cleat,
> > > > >
> > > > > 082 single bullet block,
> > > > > &
> > > > >
> > > > > > > 071
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > stand-up spring mounted on the aft
> > > > >
> > > > > starboard gunnel. The
> > > > > swiveling
> > > > >
> > > > > > > arm
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > cam
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > base & cam-matic cleat on the end of the
> > > > >
> > > > > arm allows me to reach
> > > > > the
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > backstay
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > adjuster from virtually any helm position.
> > > > >
> > > > > The backstay adjuster
> > > > >
> > > > > > line
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > marked with calibration marks for quick,
> > > > >
> > > > > reproducible tension
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > adjustments.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I used the big Harken 144 swivel cam base
> > > > >
> > > > > because this unit is
> > > > >
> > > > > > mounted
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > right
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > by where people come aboard over the
> > > > >
> > > > > transom from the boarding
> > > > >
> > > > > > ladder.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 144 is sufficiently stout that you can
> > > > >
> > > > > stand on the swiveling arm
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > without
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > damaging it. I've been sailing with this
> > > > >
> > > > > backstay adjuster setup
> > > > >
> > > > > > > since
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 1988. It's been absolutely bulletproof so
> > > > >
> > > > > far.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Try it - You'll like it a whole bunch!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Roger Pihlaja
> > > > > > > > > > S/V Dynamic Equilibrium
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > > > From: "Peter Thorn" <pthorn at nc.rr.com>
> > > > > > > > > > To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list"
> > > > >
> > > > > <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 10:44 AM
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Mast Crane
> > > > >
> > > > > (was Lou Moore)
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Roger,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the detailed explanation. I
> > > > >
> > > > > am the child of an ME,
> > > > > but
> > > > >
> > > > > > > not
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > one
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > myself. All my engineering is pants
> > > > >
> > > > > seat. I'll add "eccentric
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > loading"
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > my sailing jargon vocabulary.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > So, how much tension can you add to your
> > > > >
> > > > > forestay by adjusting
> > > > >
> > > > > > your
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > backstay? Can the 12" crane actually
> > > > >
> > > > > put more tension on
> > > > > forestay
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > than
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > std
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > crane can? We all know a light beam
> > > > >
> > > > > straight entry points much
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > better.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > And, will your Harken furler track allow
> > > > >
> > > > > the forestay to sag and
> > > > >
> > > > > > > power
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > up
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > (for light air)?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > For any boat with sail reduction
> > > > >
> > > > > capacity, mast bending might be
> > > > > a
> > > > >
> > > > > > > bit
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > unnecessary - but non-the-less
> > > > >
> > > > > interesting. After all, one can
> > > > >
> > > > > > > bend
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > mast probably quicker than any other
> > > > >
> > > > > de-powering technique.
> > > > >
> > > > > > During
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > race
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > it wouldn't distract from more important
> > > > >
> > > > > things (like paying
> > > > >
> > > > > > > attention
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > the wind) nearly as much as furling
> > > > >
> > > > > would. How much mast bend
> > > > >
> > > > > > (say
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > by
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > "cord/inches") can you induce in Dynamic
> > > > >
> > > > > Equilibrium's mast
> > > > > above
> > > > >
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > spreaders?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > As always, I enjoy your posts.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > PT
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Peter,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Michael is talking about Dynamic
> > > > >
> > > > > Equilibrium's masthead. I
> > > > > have
> > > > >
> > > > > > > my
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > double
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > backstay attachment point moved aft
> > > > >
> > > > > about 6 inches in order to
> > > > >
> > > > > > > allow
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > double backstays to clear the roach of
> > > > >
> > > > > my fully battened
> > > > >
> > > > > > mainsail.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Mast bend is highly dependent upon how
> > > > >
> > > > > you setup the tension
> > > > > in
> > > > >
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > standing
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > rigging. I believe there is there is
> > > > >
> > > > > a standing rigging
> > > > > tuning
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > procedure
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > the FAQ page.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > However, if you modify the masthead
> > > > >
> > > > > geometry, like on my boat,
> > > > >
> > > > > > the
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > mast
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > operates a little bit differently than
> > > > >
> > > > > standard. The mast can
> > > > >
> > > > > > be
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > modeled
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > a column statically loaded by the
> > > > >
> > > > > standing rigging in
> > > > >
> > > > > > compression
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > cantilever beam point loaded at the
> > > > >
> > > > > masthead. The standard
> > > > >
> > > > > > > masthead
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > geometry loads the upper end of the
> > > > >
> > > > > mast pretty symetrically.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > However,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > when
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > you move the double backstay
> > > > >
> > > > > attachment point aft, you are
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > introducing
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > factor called "eccentricity" (e) into
> > > > >
> > > > > the column loading.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > Basically,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > think
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > of e as the amount by which the
> > > > >
> > > > > compression force vector is
> > > > >
> > > > > > moved
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > off
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > neutral axis of the column. i.e. when
> > > > >
> > > > > e = 0, the compression
> > > > >
> > > > > > load
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > applied right down the neutral axis of
> > > > >
> > > > > the column & you have
> > > > >
> > > > > > pure
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > column
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > buckling. As e is increased, the
> > > > >
> > > > > deflection of the column
> > > > > under
> > > > >
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > load
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > behaves like a combination of column
> > > > >
> > > > > buckling + bending of a
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > cantilever
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > beam
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > point loaded on the free end. This
> > > > >
> > > > > cantilever beam bending
> > > > > from
> > > > >
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > eccentricity is in addition to the
> > > > >
> > > > > cantilever beam bending
> > > > >
> > > > > > induced
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > by
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > standing rigging. As far as inducing
> > > > >
> > > > > mast bend, it's the
> > > > > total
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > cantilever
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > beam deflection we are interested in
> > > > >
> > > > > because it's reproducible
> > > > > &
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > controllable. Column buckling is sort
> > > > >
> > > > > of an on/off
> > > > > catastrophic
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > kind
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > failure - i.e. virtually no bend up to
> > > > >
> > > > > some critical load &
> > > > >
> > > > > > then,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > BAM!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > buckled mast.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > You might not think that mast bend is
> > > > >
> > > > > possible in a masthead
> > > > >
> > > > > > rig.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > However,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > you have to think about the behavior
> > > > >
> > > > > of the mast in a 3-D
> > > > > world.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > As
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > mast is bent, the height of the
> > > > >
> > > > > masthead off the deck is also
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > reduced.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Although the forestay length attached
> > > > >
> > > > > to the front of the
> > > > >
> > > > > > masthead
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > doesn't
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > change, because the masthead drops
> > > > >
> > > > > down as well as moving aft,
> > > > >
> > > > > > the
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > mast
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > still assume a bent shape. This bent
> > > > >
> > > > > shape can be fine tuned
> > > > > by
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > adjusting
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > the tension of the 4 lower sidestays,
> > > > >
> > > > > which collectively
> > > > >
> > > > > > restrain
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > mast
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > from moving from side-to-side as well
> > > > >
> > > > > as fore-aft at about the
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > midpoint.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The standard double backstay tension
> > > > >
> > > > > adjuster with the
> > > > > standard
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > masthead
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > geometry is also capable of bending
> > > > >
> > > > > the mast. However,
> > > > > because
> > > > >
> > > > > > e
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > very
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > small value with the standard masthead
> > > > >
> > > > > geometry, the required
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > backstay
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > tension to achieve a given amount of
> > > > >
> > > > > mast bend is much higher,
> > > > >
> > > > > > > which
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > compression loads the mast closer to
> > > > >
> > > > > the critical column
> > > > >
> > > > > > buckling
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > load.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Note, this discussion is only
> > > > >
> > > > > applicable for the standard rig.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > Never
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > bend
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > an IMF mainsail mast.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Roger Pihlaja
> > > > > > > > > > > > S/V Dynamic Equilibrium
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > > > > > From: "Peter Thorn" <pthorn at nc.rr.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list"
> > > > >
> > > > > <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 3:27 AM
> > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Mast Crane
> > > > >
> > > > > (was Lou Moore)
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Michael et al,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 12" mast crane? Very interesting
> > > > >
> > > > > idea.. Would the forestay
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > tension
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > boost
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > with that much leverage? Or just
> > > > >
> > > > > create mastbend above the
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > spreaders?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Has
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > anyone, in the life of the universe,
> > > > >
> > > > > ever created upper mast
> > > > >
> > > > > > > bend
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > std
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > rig? (You were probably thinking
> > > > >
> > > > > about clearing a big
> > > > >
> > > > > > roach).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Afterthought- Does a Harken forestay
> > > > >
> > > > > furler have a soft
> > > > > track?
> > > > >
> > > > > > > If
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > its
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > hard
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > metal, can you somehow belly the
> > > > >
> > > > > Genoa entry for light air?
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > PT
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > PS - Go fasts are fun, but I'd trade
> > > > >
> > > > > them for a favorable
> > > > >
> > > > > > shift.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > well now, I think I have to switch
> > > > >
> > > > > sides this year,
> > > > >
> > > > > > > full-batted
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > main
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > sail
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > with a 12 inch crane are the way to
> > > > >
> > > > > go, single line
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > reefing and a soild boom vang, but
> > > > >
> > > > > IMF is more convent.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > MJM
> > > > >
> > > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org,
> > > > >
> > > > > Help?
> > > > >
> > > > > > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > >
> > > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org,
> > > > >
> > > > > Help?
> > > > > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org,
> > > > >
> > > > > Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> > > > >
> > > > > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> > > > >
> > > > > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> > > > >
> > > > > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> > > > >
> > > > > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> > > > >
> > > > > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > >
> > > > > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> > > > >
> > > > > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > >
> > > > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> > > > >
> > > > > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> > > >
> > > >www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >__________________________________
> > > >Do you Yahoo!?
> > > >Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
> > > >http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > >__________________________________________________
> > > >Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>
More information about the Rhodes22-list
mailing list