[Rhodes22-list] Can a girlyman be a sailor

[Peter Thorn]

Stan,

Kudos to you for well said.  The Kerry Edwards campaign needs you!

PT


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "stan" <stan at rhodes22.com>
To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Can a girlyman be a sailor


> We are back to politics? - Wonderful:
>
> Notice when it is one of their own they flip flop:
>
> Cheney's daughter is gay so he is against the constitution amendment.
>
> Bush's father and TX friends went out of their way to keep him out of the
> fray but if you sign up for it like Kerry did, and find it was a mistake -
> that is a flip flop.
>
> If anyone else is accused of a conflict of interest, like Clinton's wife
was
> strung up for, that is ok, but the flip flop allows Mrs. Cheney to sit on
> the board of our huge defense contractor and that is not a conflict of
> interest.  Under whose definition?.
>
> If you want to do the real count on flip flops, see Effros book of quotes
to
> see who leads by a mile.
>
> Chris Mathews says the differences in this election are crisp if you look
at
> the major issues - I liked the way he put the decision making:
>
> If you want to cut taxes proportionally much higher for the wealthiest of
> us - you know who to vote for.  .
>
> If you have reservations on advancing science - you know who to vote for.
> (If you have questions on this one, ask president Regan's son)
>
> If you want us to lead the world single handedly - you know who to vote
for.
>
> If you do not mind someone else's kid dying to secure Feluja (sp?) as long
> as it is not you or yours who has to die for this strategic piece of land
> needed to keep us free of terrorist - you know who to vote for
> (personally I grieve more for the thousands and thousands whose lives are
> now shattered by wounds then I do for the ones who may be going to heaven
to
> get their 40 virgins)
>
> If you think the way to have no child left behind is to have the rest of
the
> children stand still while the left behind kids catch up and therefore
flip
> flop over the funding of the program as it was intended - you know who to
> vote for.
>
> If you think being for the environment is passing a law requiring new
energy
> plants to meet regulations and then allowing all energy plants to rebuild
> themselves 99% and call that "not new" so not under the regulations - you
> know who to vote for.
>
> And if you think the costs of the higher health bills with lower worker
> productivity that results from dismantling in-place environmental
> regulations can be made up with tie-ins to a stock market because it
always
> goes up - you know who to vote for.
>
> If you agree that the super new debt is going to be taken care of by the
> super booming economy just around the corner - you know who to vote for.
>
> If you think leadership is someone who sits there for seven minutes in a
> helpless state with a totally blanc look when told we are being attacked,
or
> who lands on an aircraft carrier and emerges from a war plane announcing
the
> war is over when it has not even started, is the kind of man we need to
lead
> this country in war - you know who to vote for.
>
> If you think government should stay off your back and not be telling you
how
> to run your personal business and then flip flops and tells you what you
> have to do with your body - you know who to vote for.
>
> If you think religion should be allowed to sneak into government by
funding
> religious organizations and other creeping back door techniques because
you
> think religiously controlled countries are more likely to live in peace -
> you know who to vote for  - but you don't know your history or current
> events..
>
> sorry, I am running out of time - not issues that make this election an
easy
> distinction between the two major parties.
>
> Just go out and vote - or you deserve what you get.  The last election was
> lost to the minority by just a handful of voters not voting to counteract
a
> handful of incompetent old Jewish voters who voted for the favorite son,
> Buchanan, because they could not make out a ballot that showed the wrong
> picture next to the one they actually intended to make president.   Vote.
> Your vote does make a difference.
>
> stan/gbi
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Steve Alm" <salm at mn.rr.com>
> To: "Rhodes" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 3:11 AM
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Can a girlyman be a sailor
>
>
> > No doubt it takes that kind of fire power to guard the Republicans and
> > their
> > little get-together this week.  Without them putting their butts on the
> > line, ready to take a bullet for...um...let's see...who?  Just because
> > you're paranoid doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you.  There must be
> > SOMEONE who deserves all that tax-payer money.  Would you take a bullet
> > for
> > a politician that most of the world hates?  I wouldn't.  And if that
makes
> > me a girlyman, then show me to the pantyhose isle!  Maybe the original
> > girlyman, Corporal Klinger, had it right all along.  8-)
> >
> > Slim
> >
> > On 9/1/04 9:19 PM, "Michael Meltzer" <mjm at michaelmeltzer.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Ok, I have a beer in one hand and bowl of peanuts near the other. Still
> >> wondering about girlymem, I have to admit the 4 grardsman on
> >> the train patform looked cute, the 2 state police riding in the train
car
> >> had
> >> nice hair cuts, The 200 plus cops in thier cute blue
> >> NYPD uniforms(48 to 58 street, the waldoff did it) while I walk to the
> >> office.
> >> But the cutest of all was the swat terms(NYDP
> >> specical action units), They look darling standing thier in thier tight
> >> unimforms, standing thier with thier m16a2 finger indexed
> >> long the triger(at least point down) and the selector set to 3 round(I
> >> think
> >> so), I gives me a woody just thinking about it. Bad
> >> day! haw! How many are putting thier ass on the line.
> >>
> >> MJM
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "ed kroposki" <ekroposki at charter.net>
> >> To: "'The Rhodes 22 mail list'" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:53 AM
> >> Subject: RE: [Rhodes22-list] Can a girlyman be a sailor
> >>
> >>
> >>> Michael:
> >>> We understand that you had a bad day.  The use of alcohol after such
> >>> a day yields weird results.  Stay away from the bottle.
> >>> Just tune into Rum Runner music: http://users2.ev1.net/~barr/
> >>> Listen and you can tell what rum will do to you.
> >>>
> >>> Ed K
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> >>> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of
> >>> R22RumRunner at aol.com
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:18 AM
> >>> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Can a girlyman be a sailor
> >>>
> >>> Answer......NO. That would be an oxymoron.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Rummy
> >>> __________________________________________________
> >>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> __________________________________________________
> >>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>>
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> >
>
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list