[Rhodes22-list] NC-PHRF appeal
Mary Lou Troy
mltroy at verizon.net
Wed Apr 20 23:03:04 EDT 2005
Congratulations Peter. Persistence and logic seem to have paid off.
Mary Lou
At 06:56 PM 4/20/2005 -0400, you wrote:
>Hello Rhodies~
>
>In today's mail the NC-PHRF appeal arrived. It was very good news.
>
>Last year at the Oriental Cup Regatta it almost blew the flags off the
>poles. So, since I believe sailboat races are won going to windward, I
>decided to amend Raven's rating application to include Raven's very nice
>2003 Doyle 135 genny as the only headsail. (Thanks Mark!)
>
>They rated Raven at 276 (base rating 267 plus 9/sec/mile additional for
>headsail). That certainly is quite a generous rating and much more than I
>expected.
>
>Perhaps they were convinced that Standard Mains are faster, so they set
>the Rhodes 22 base rating 3 sec/mile higher than their base rating for the
>Rhodes Continental. If I start to enjoy racing success with Raven, they
>are likely to quickly adjust the base rating downward, as happened to Roger.
>
>As promised, here's the text of the NC-PHRF Rhodes 22 base rating appeal
>submitted a few weeks ago. It makes good bed-time reading.
>
>PT
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Bill Jarvis, Chairman
>NC-PHRF
>
>The 2005 NC-PHRF Yearbook has lots of useful information and I am happy to
>have it. I am a 24 year member of the Carolina Sailing Club (one-design)
>at Kerr Lake and know that race management work sometimes goes
>unrecognized. So, "Thanks!" to you and the members of your committee for
>your service to the sport of sailboat racing and for providing the
>organizational structure for PHRF racing.
>
>In February I acquired s/v Raven, a 1988 Rhodes 22. My Admiral Tana is
>not a racer, so the primary purpose of this great trailer-sailor boat is
>to enable us to cruise coastal waters within a 3-5 hour drive of Chapel
>Hill, NC. Raven will be a great vessel for that! For the last three
>years I crewed with Lawrence Miller on his Tanzer 26 in the Oriental Cup
>Regatta This year I hope to enter Raven in that race and that's why I
>applied to NC-PHRF.
>
>When the measurement certificate and 2005 NC-PHRF Handbook arrived, I was
>surprised to learn that NC-PHRF has two Base Ratings for the Rhodes
>22. The Rhodes 22 is listed at Base Rate 216 and Rhodes 22 Continental is
>listed at Base Rate 264. These two are essentially the same boat,
>therefore I believe there must be an error. The Rhodes Continental Base
>Rating of 264 is consistent with other PHRF base ratings I have seen
>published for the boat, but I have never seen a PHRF rating published
>anywhere, except for NC-PHRF, showing the Rhodes 22 as low as 216.
>
>Stan Spitzer of General Boats Inc. has been continuously building these
>boats, first in New York starting in the 1960s and, more recently in the
>old Tanzer plant in Edenton, NC. http://www.rhodes22.com/ . When he
>started, Stan called the boat the Rhodes Continental. Sometime in the
>1980s he relocated to NC and changed the name, for marketing purposes I
>think, to the Rhodes 22. The boat has been steadily improved with luxury
>cruising features over the years, but the hull, centerboard and rudder are
>identical on the Rhodes Continental and most Rhodes 22s. Recently, Stan
>started building the boat with a triangular "Diamond Board"- I think since
>the late '90s. I do not know of any Rhodes 22s with Diamond Boards that
>race or if there is any advantage or disadvantage to the newer centerboard.
>
>Although the two boats are essentially alike, there are a few minor
>differences:
> 1) Rhodes Continentals have more powerful rigs. The hulls are a few
> hundred pounds lighter and carry a larger, roached, leech battened,
> "standard" mainsail with adequate amounts of draft forward.
>
> 2) The Rhodes 22 IMF (In Mast Furling) mainsail
> http://www.rhodes22.com/mast_small.html is a cruising convenience but
> also a much less powerful rig than the standard mainsail on the Rhodes
> Continental. Most newer Rhodes 22s have IMF. Because the mainsail
> rolls up on a vertical tube inside the mast, it cannot have battens to
> support a roach, so the mailsails are smaller, cut very flat and are
> roachless. To get the main flat enough to roll up on the vertical IMF
> roller, much of the sail shape that generates power to drive the boat is
> compromised. Many newer boats have heavier built-in heads, nicer
> interior finishes and heavier, thicker hulls. All this weight ads up, so
> the new boats are heavier and have less powerful rigs. (To further
> complicate matters, it should be noted that all Rhodes Continentals have
> standard mailsail rigs, but not all Rhodes 22s come equipped with IMF
> mailsails. Since the boats are built to order, a few owners prefer to
> forgo the sailhandling convenience of IMF in favor of the greater
> performance of a standard rig. Most buy the boat for cruising, as I did,
> and prefer IMF).
>The Rhodes 22 Continental with standard main (NC-PHRF base rating 264) is
>widely considered in the owners group to be the faster boat. Therefore it
>must be a mistake to rate the Rhodes 22 IMF lower (NC-PHRF base rating
>216). It just doesn't pass the logic test. So, I researched the Rhodes
>22 base rating with internet friends on the e-mail R22 owner's group
>list-serve for more information.
>
>Bob Dilk has a 1976 (?) Rhodes Continental s/v Knot Necessary he raced at
>the Pamlico Sailing Club (PSC) out of McCotter's Marina in little
>Washington, NC until he moved to TN in 2003. He said the PSC-PHRF
>committee rated his boat at 256. Bob Dilk writes:
> "Yes I did race with the PSC. We had 3 classes and I was in the
> slowest class. My sails were blown out, but I learned a lot. It was (is)
> a great club, and I had several boats that were my competition. I have
> replaced both the main and the Genoa with new (used) sails from Stan. The
> boat is better but I need some slower boats to come out and play. The
> Rhodes 22 is not a racing hull, but I have learned to make it point
> better (sic) and this helps when I am cruising. Less tacks getting home."
>
> [ I am copying Jay Price, a member of your committee also listed on the
> PSC website as a handicapper. I hope Jay can provide additional
> information on this issue.]
>Roger Philaja wrote about his experience PHRF racing his Rhodes
>Continental s/v Dynamic Equilibrium in Arkansas in the early
>1990s. (Note: Roger sails Dynamic Equilibrium with a 155 Mylar Genoa,
>fully battened main with custom masthead crane to allow maximum roach and
>a masthead spinnaker).
> "I've not been able to find any specific PHRF reference to Rhodes 22's
> with IMF vs. the standard rig. The USYRU PHRF Rating Handbook gives a
> range of 258 sec/mile to 312 sec/mile, all fleets indicating limited
> racing experience (reflecting the relatively small number of Rhodes 22
> out there which are being PHRF raced) I suspect the 312 sec/mile rating
> is with IMF & 258 sec/mile is with the standard rig.
>
> The race committee at the Lake Dardanelle Sailing Club in Russellville,
> AR had no experience with a PHRF rating for the Rhodes 22. They started
> me out at 300 sec/mile in 1987. I was steadily adjusted downward until my
> rating was 234 sec/mile in the fall, 1990 season. In light to moderate
> air, I could sail to this rating if I didn't make any mistakes & Daniel,
> my foresail trimmer (7 years old at the time), didn't lose his
> concentration. At about 15 knots apparent wind speed, I needed to reef
> the boat to keep her sailing on her lines & could no longer sail to this
> rating."
>Mark Kaynor, previous owner of Raven, offered this web reference for
>PHRF-NE (New England) that gives the Rhodes Continental 22 a 276 base
>rating. http://www.phrfne.org/baseh.htm .
>
>YRALIS (Long Island Sound) base rates the Rhodes 22 Continental at 258
>http://www.yralis.org/2004/base_ratings.html p33
>
>There are not many Rhodes 22 owners who race -- it is primarily purchased
>as a trailerable cruising boat. There seems to be scant data on the
>boat. Other than Bob Dilk's boat, do you know about any Rhodes 22s that
>have raced in NC-PHRF?
>
>Please consider this request and look into how the Rhodes 22 base rating
>was established to be so low. Perhaps it was just a typo. Thank you for
>your time and attention.
>
>Fair winds,
>
>Peter Thorn
>Chapel Hill, NC
>__________________________________________________
>Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
More information about the Rhodes22-list
mailing list