[Rhodes22-list] Reply to Barney

[bestpestcontrol at earthlink.net]

Ed I was only concerned that I wasnt getting any mail from da list. I dont
do back channel unless someone asks me to for a very good reason. I enjoy
the list too much and have no valid reason to back channel as I
said.--Barney--(Sea Duced)

> [Original Message]
> From: kroposki <kroposki at innova.net>
> To: The Rhodes 22 mail list <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Date: 12/23/2005 7:45:42 PM
> Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Reply to Barney
>
> Barney,
> 	I do not understand your question.  If you would, pour a glass
> of holiday spiced rum and explain your question in detail.  Maybe it has
> to do with all the back channel communications thought to be acceptable.
> Did you see that Bill Effros got email as he termed back channel and
> thought that he was obligated to keep that persons communications
> secret.  There is a new urge for secrecy on the list.  Mark and the
> northern Bob think that secrecy is the way the list should operate.  I
> did not see you comment on their demands for secrecy.  
> 	If you want chatter, maybe you should ask a question, make a
> statement or make a strident demand.  Are you on the frapper?  
>
> Ed K
> Stuck in genuine American snow in Vermont, USA
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
> Text inserted by Panda Platinum 2005 Internet Security:
>
>  This message has NOT been classified as spam. If it is unsolicited mail
(spam), click on the following link to reclassify it:
http://127.0.0.1:6083/Panda?ID=pav_3085&SPAM=true
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------