[Rhodes22-list]Question about OUT OF OFFICE REPLIES
William P. Barry, III
wp.barry at att.net
Thu Feb 10 15:12:53 EST 2005
i think my ultimate goal was just that eventually whoever they may be
without mentioning names would take the hint and others in the future might
think twice. Wasn't really going to make it a personal issue as to contact
these people direct.
William P. Barry, III
barryw at hillsboroughems.com
wp.barry at att.net
NJ State EMT-B
HRS ID: 487
----- Original Message -----
From: "Saroj Gilbert" <saroj at pathfind.net>
To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list]Question about OUT OF OFFICE REPLIES
> second chuckle of the day... we could really start something with these
> auto-reply's emailing one another with a "reply all"... bet you could take
> down the entire internet if they replicated nicely with one another....
>
> Saroj
>
> P.S. since there is no point in emailing Anderson... maybe Rummy or
someone
> with his phone number could make a call...
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mary Lou Troy" <mltroy at verizon.net>
> To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 8:35 AM
> Subject: RE: [Rhodes22-list]Question about OUT OF OFFICE REPLIES
>
>
> > Ed and Will,
> > When I look at my regular messages coming in from the list they look
like
> > they are "from" an individual with a "reply to" the list. My guess is
that
> > the autoreply feature Mr. Anderson is using (I got one directly to my
> > email address as well) looks at that "from" line and spits out its reply
> > never seeing the "reply to" that engages when when you hit the ordinary
> > reply button on your emailer. It's probably better this way. I've been
on
> > lists where two members' autoreply functions started emailing each
other -
> > it's pretty grim.
> >
> > Best wishes.
> >
> > Mary Lou
> >
> > At 08:00 AM 2/10/2005 -0500, you wrote:
> >>Will:
> >> I only got one yesterday. It seemed like it was list related.
> >>However, last night I looked at the details that were evident in it, it
> >>may
> >>not be generated by what we think it is. This particular one was my
list
> >>reply to Mary Lou about Snopes. It was generated by a Dennis Anderson.
> >>It
> >>came directly to me, and was not thru the list. Check archives, no
record
> >>of his automated response on the list. It has to do with us sending
> >>replies
> >>to the list. It would take Michael to track how we got it, I do not
have
> >>his sniffing ability.
> >>
> >>Ed K
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>__________________________________________________
> >>Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
More information about the Rhodes22-list
mailing list