[Rhodes22-list] Nuclear Energy Replies

[ed kroposki]

Roger:
	You will not convince Bill or his fellow travelers of what you are
saying. Iran and for that matter, Syria are just trying to help their people
to better lives.  And what was that message the Israelis let slip in
international circles in the last couple of days?  That they can not wait
for the Europeans to resolve the issue.  I guess we all better sail while we
can, it is liable to get messy over their.  

Some recent info:
www.islamonline.com/cgi-bin/news_service/middle_east_full_story.asp?service_
id=6795

(page down to nuclear discussion) http://billroggio.com/

www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/news_service/middle_east_full_story.asp?service_id
=7062

www.aljazeera.com/cgi-in/news_service/middle_east_full_story.asp?service_ID=
6945



Ed K
Greenville, SC, USA
Addendum:  2000 mockingbirds = two kilomockingbirds

-----Original Message-----
From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
[mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of Steve
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 9:14 AM
To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Nuclear Energy

Well said, Roger.
Steve


--- Roger Pihlaja <cen09402 at centurytel.net> wrote:
> Bill,
> 
> You have to wonder why they want it.  Iran is
> sitting on proven reserves of
> about 1 trillion barrels of crude oil as well as
> copious quantities of
> natural gas.  The country has excellent warm water,
> ice-free port facilities
> to ship their crude oil and natural gas.  They have
> a pretty good
> intra-country pipeline and refinery infrastructure. 
> They have zero reserves
> of uranium.  At the present rate of energy
> production & given Iran's current
> population, GDP, & growth rate, their proven fossil
> fuel reserves will
> supply all their internal energy and export needs
> for the next 50-75 years,
> even if the country gets heavily into manufacturing
> petrochemicals like
> polyethylene, polypropylene, nylon, etc.  That's
> enough time to build and
> use up at least 1 generation of nuclear power plants
> before they are even
> necessary.
> 
> Gee, do you think maybe, just maybe, Iran has an
> alternate agenda here?
> 
> Roger Pihlaja
> S/V Dynamic Equilibrium
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Effros" <bill at effros.com>
> To: "R22 List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 1:52 PM
> Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Nucular Energy
> 
> 
> > Been meaning to ask.
> >
> > How 'bout that Iran?
> >
> > Do they get to have nuclear energy, too?
> >
> > Or is it only safe enough for us?
> >
> > Bill Effros