[Rhodes22-list] Nuclear Energy Replies

[Rob Lowe]

Gee Roger, do I detect a bit of partaininship in your response?  I seem to
remember there were two presidents between Carter and Clinton, namely Reagan
and Bush the first.  I seem to recall them being part of the appeasement
process too.

Rob Lowe
S/V Getaway

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roger Pihlaja" <cen09402 at centurytel.net>
To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 6:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Nuclear Energy Replies


> Ed,
>
> Boy, scary stuff!  It's starting to sound more and more like my fearless
> prediction from late September, 2004 about an Israeli military strike on
the
> Iranian nuclear industry is going to come true.  It's currently late
> February, 2005 and my original prediction said it would happen within a
> year, or by late September, 2005.  I'll stand by my original timing.
>
> Israel absolutely cannot tolerate an Iran with nuclear weapons.  It's a
life
> or death issue for them.
>
> Fortunately, Israel does not have Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter
negotiating
> "on their behalf" like the United States did in 1994 with North Korea.  I
> still can't believe Carter won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1994 for that
craven
> piece of appeasement.  Now, North Korea has nuclear weapons using the
> "peaceful" nuclear power reactors that Carter & Clinton gave them as part
of
> that deal.  Gee, a tyranical communist dictator went back on his word and
> treaty obligations and started building nuclear weapons about 10 minutes
> after the ink was dry on the 1994 agreement.  Who would have ever expected
> that?  Clinton & Carter should be tried for high treason for setting the
> world up for another 50 years of nuclear stand-off with a communist
> dictatorship.  That's a best-case scenario, if we're "lucky".  The
> worst-case scenarios get considerably scarier.
>
> Allow Iran to get nukes?  I don't think so!
>
> On a brighter note, I saw the 1st sign of spring today.  The 2005 West
> Marine and Defender Marine Master Catalogs arrived via the US Snail Mail!
> Can ice breakup be far behind?
>
> 2000 mockingbirds = two kilomockingbirds  cute! :)
>
> Roger Pihlaja
> S/V Dynamic Equilibrium
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "ed kroposki" <ekroposki at charter.net>
> To: "'The Rhodes 22 mail list'" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 11:02 AM
> Subject: RE: [Rhodes22-list] Nuclear Energy Replies
>
>
> >
> > Roger:
> > You will not convince Bill or his fellow travelers of what you are
> > saying. Iran and for that matter, Syria are just trying to help their
> people
> > to better lives.  And what was that message the Israelis let slip in
> > international circles in the last couple of days?  That they can not
wait
> > for the Europeans to resolve the issue.  I guess we all better sail
while
> we
> > can, it is liable to get messy over their.
> >
> > Some recent info:
> >
>
www.islamonline.com/cgi-bin/news_service/middle_east_full_story.asp?service_
> > id=6795
> >
> > (page down to nuclear discussion) http://billroggio.com/
> >
> >
>
www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/news_service/middle_east_full_story.asp?service_id
> > =7062
> >
> >
>
www.aljazeera.com/cgi-in/news_service/middle_east_full_story.asp?service_ID=
> > 6945
> >
> >
> >
> > Ed K
> > Greenville, SC, USA
> > Addendum:  2000 mockingbirds = two kilomockingbirds
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> > [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of Steve
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 9:14 AM
> > To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
> > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Nuclear Energy
> >
> > Well said, Roger.
> > Steve
> >
> >
> > --- Roger Pihlaja <cen09402 at centurytel.net> wrote:
> > > Bill,
> > >
> > > You have to wonder why they want it.  Iran is
> > > sitting on proven reserves of
> > > about 1 trillion barrels of crude oil as well as
> > > copious quantities of
> > > natural gas.  The country has excellent warm water,
> > > ice-free port facilities
> > > to ship their crude oil and natural gas.  They have
> > > a pretty good
> > > intra-country pipeline and refinery infrastructure.
> > > They have zero reserves
> > > of uranium.  At the present rate of energy
> > > production & given Iran's current
> > > population, GDP, & growth rate, their proven fossil
> > > fuel reserves will
> > > supply all their internal energy and export needs
> > > for the next 50-75 years,
> > > even if the country gets heavily into manufacturing
> > > petrochemicals like
> > > polyethylene, polypropylene, nylon, etc.  That's
> > > enough time to build and
> > > use up at least 1 generation of nuclear power plants
> > > before they are even
> > > necessary.
> > >
> > > Gee, do you think maybe, just maybe, Iran has an
> > > alternate agenda here?
> > >
> > > Roger Pihlaja
> > > S/V Dynamic Equilibrium
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Bill Effros" <bill at effros.com>
> > > To: "R22 List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > > Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 1:52 PM
> > > Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Nucular Energy
> > >
> > >
> > > > Been meaning to ask.
> > > >
> > > > How 'bout that Iran?
> > > >
> > > > Do they get to have nuclear energy, too?
> > > >
> > > > Or is it only safe enough for us?
> > > >
> > > > Bill Effros
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list