[Rhodes22-list] Nuclear Energy Replies

Roger Pihlaja cen09402 at centurytel.net
Wed Feb 23 09:27:58 EST 2005


----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Lowe" <rlowe at vt.edu>
To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 8:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Nuclear Energy Replies


> Gee Roger, do I detect a bit of partaininship in your response?  I seem to
> remember there were two presidents between Carter and Clinton, namely
Reagan
> and Bush the first.  I seem to recall them being part of the appeasement
> process too.
>
> Rob Lowe
> S/V Getaway
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roger Pihlaja" <cen09402 at centurytel.net>
> To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 6:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Nuclear Energy Replies
>
>
> > Ed,
> >
> > Boy, scary stuff!  It's starting to sound more and more like my fearless
> > prediction from late September, 2004 about an Israeli military strike on
> the
> > Iranian nuclear industry is going to come true.  It's currently late
> > February, 2005 and my original prediction said it would happen within a
> > year, or by late September, 2005.  I'll stand by my original timing.
> >
> > Israel absolutely cannot tolerate an Iran with nuclear weapons.  It's a
> life
> > or death issue for them.
> >
> > Fortunately, Israel does not have Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter
> negotiating
> > "on their behalf" like the United States did in 1994 with North Korea.
I
> > still can't believe Carter won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1994 for that
> craven
> > piece of appeasement.  Now, North Korea has nuclear weapons using the
> > "peaceful" nuclear power reactors that Carter & Clinton gave them as
part
> of
> > that deal.  Gee, a tyranical communist dictator went back on his word
and
> > treaty obligations and started building nuclear weapons about 10 minutes
> > after the ink was dry on the 1994 agreement.  Who would have ever
expected
> > that?  Clinton & Carter should be tried for high treason for setting the
> > world up for another 50 years of nuclear stand-off with a communist
> > dictatorship.  That's a best-case scenario, if we're "lucky".  The
> > worst-case scenarios get considerably scarier.
> >
> > Allow Iran to get nukes?  I don't think so!
> >
> > On a brighter note, I saw the 1st sign of spring today.  The 2005 West
> > Marine and Defender Marine Master Catalogs arrived via the US Snail
Mail!
> > Can ice breakup be far behind?
> >
> > 2000 mockingbirds = two kilomockingbirds  cute! :)
> >
> > Roger Pihlaja
> > S/V Dynamic Equilibrium
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "ed kroposki" <ekroposki at charter.net>
> > To: "'The Rhodes 22 mail list'" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 11:02 AM
> > Subject: RE: [Rhodes22-list] Nuclear Energy Replies
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Roger:
> > > You will not convince Bill or his fellow travelers of what you are
> > > saying. Iran and for that matter, Syria are just trying to help their
> > people
> > > to better lives.  And what was that message the Israelis let slip in
> > > international circles in the last couple of days?  That they can not
> wait
> > > for the Europeans to resolve the issue.  I guess we all better sail
> while
> > we
> > > can, it is liable to get messy over their.
> > >
> > > Some recent info:
> > >
> >
>
www.islamonline.com/cgi-bin/news_service/middle_east_full_story.asp?service_
> > > id=6795
> > >
> > > (page down to nuclear discussion) http://billroggio.com/
> > >
> > >
> >
>
www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/news_service/middle_east_full_story.asp?service_id
> > > =7062
> > >
> > >
> >
>
www.aljazeera.com/cgi-in/news_service/middle_east_full_story.asp?service_ID=
> > > 6945
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ed K
> > > Greenville, SC, USA
> > > Addendum:  2000 mockingbirds = two kilomockingbirds
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> > > [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of Steve
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 9:14 AM
> > > To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
> > > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Nuclear Energy
> > >
> > > Well said, Roger.
> > > Steve
> > >
> > >
> > > --- Roger Pihlaja <cen09402 at centurytel.net> wrote:
> > > > Bill,
> > > >
> > > > You have to wonder why they want it.  Iran is
> > > > sitting on proven reserves of
> > > > about 1 trillion barrels of crude oil as well as
> > > > copious quantities of
> > > > natural gas.  The country has excellent warm water,
> > > > ice-free port facilities
> > > > to ship their crude oil and natural gas.  They have
> > > > a pretty good
> > > > intra-country pipeline and refinery infrastructure.
> > > > They have zero reserves
> > > > of uranium.  At the present rate of energy
> > > > production & given Iran's current
> > > > population, GDP, & growth rate, their proven fossil
> > > > fuel reserves will
> > > > supply all their internal energy and export needs
> > > > for the next 50-75 years,
> > > > even if the country gets heavily into manufacturing
> > > > petrochemicals like
> > > > polyethylene, polypropylene, nylon, etc.  That's
> > > > enough time to build and
> > > > use up at least 1 generation of nuclear power plants
> > > > before they are even
> > > > necessary.
> > > >
> > > > Gee, do you think maybe, just maybe, Iran has an
> > > > alternate agenda here?
> > > >
> > > > Roger Pihlaja
> > > > S/V Dynamic Equilibrium
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Bill Effros" <bill at effros.com>
> > > > To: "R22 List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > > > Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 1:52 PM
> > > > Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Nucular Energy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Been meaning to ask.
> > > > >
> > > > > How 'bout that Iran?
> > > > >
> > > > > Do they get to have nuclear energy, too?
> > > > >
> > > > > Or is it only safe enough for us?
> > > > >
> > > > > Bill Effros
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>
>




More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list