[Rhodes22-list] Cheryl what did you get?
Steve
rhodes2282 at yahoo.com
Fri May 20 06:53:52 EDT 2005
Come on, Billie, you liberal you. Now try to think,
it will be hard, but you can do it!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Steve
--- Bill Effros <bill at effros.com> wrote:
> Stevie,
>
> So good to hear from you on this topic.
>
> You must be REALLY pissed at the current eunuch in
> the White House.
> He's been in office as long as LBJ, and has been
> telling us what he was
> going to do to Iraq since before he was elected.
> But did he go all
> out? NO!
>
> Mission Accomplished! Remember? That was over 2
> years ago!
>
> And how about Osama? "Wanted Dead or Alive"
> Remember that one? 3 1/2
> years ago.
>
> LBJ had 400,000 more troops in Vietnam than the
> pinhead now has in
> Iraq. I'll bet you've given W a piece of your mind.
>
> Or is this one Hillary's fault?
>
> Always blaming girls.
>
> Your sailing Amigo, writing from the bleeding
> hearth,
>
> Bill Effros
>
> Paton?
>
>
>
> Steve wrote:
>
> >LBJ only problem was he didn't have the balls to
> >commit fully to the war. When there is a war, you
> get
> >behind it, support it, and go all out to win at any
> >cost. Fonda is just another one of those bleeding
> >hearth liberal and has to much money and not any
> >scents.
> >
> >It a good thing she wasn't able to do something
> like
> >that durning WWII; Paton would have had her shot:-)
> >Steve
> >
> >
> >
> >--- Steve Alm <salm at mn.rr.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>OK, Steve, let's give credit where it's due: LBJ
> >>worked a lot harder and
> >>was much more successful at getting many more of
> our
> >>soldiers killed than
> >>Fonda.
> >>Slim
> >>
> >>On 5/19/05 2:17 PM, "Steve" <rhodes2282 at yahoo.com>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Cheryl
> >>>I just don't know why anyone would make fun of
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Jane
> >>
> >>
> >>>Fonda:-) She work her heart out at getting our
> >>>soldiers killed!!!!!!!!! You got to give credit
> >>>
> >>>
> >>where
> >>
> >>
> >>>credit is due:-)
> >>>Steve
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--- Cheryl O'Grady <cheryl.ogrady at mail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I love when people express their opinions
> openly,
> >>>>and it generates discussion. I probably jump in
> >>>>with both feet TOO often, and end up with said
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>feet
> >>
> >>
> >>>>in mouth. but I have gotten several messages
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>from
> >>
> >>
> >>>>someone I don't know. The first time, I just
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>pretty
> >>
> >>
> >>>>much ignored it, other than sending back a "who
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>are
> >>
> >>
> >>>>you" note. then, I don't know why, but I
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>identified
> >>
> >>
> >>>>him from an old R-22 list note. I went back in
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>my
> >>
> >>
> >>>>old mail, couldn't find him, but I am pretty
> sure
> >>>>that it was related to one of our boat search
> >>>>messaages.
> >>>>
> >>>>It was clearly not spam, and I did send back a
> >>>>not-so-friendly reply. I do have some rather
> >>>>out-in-left-field ideas, and I objected to his
> >>>>demonization of Jane Fonda. I will forward the
> >>>>message on to you, maybe you are familiar with
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>the
> >>
> >>
> >>>>guy.
> >>>>
> >>>>What I objected to was not that there were
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>political
> >>
> >>
> >>>>conversations on the list, I haven't really seen
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>too
> >>
> >>
> >>>>many, but that he is sending me email separately
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>and
> >>
> >>
> >>>>including my e-address in notes that go to the
> >>>>world. I would personally put up any of my
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>opinions
> >>
> >>
> >>>>I wanted to share on the list, not go off list,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>and
> >>
> >>
> >>>>not use the list for any other purposes.
> >>>>
> >>>>Cheryl
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>----- Original Message -----
> >>>>From: "ed kroposki" <ekroposki at charter.net>
> >>>>To: "'The Rhodes 22 mail list'"
> >>>><rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >>>>Subject: RE: [Rhodes22-list] Cheryl what did you
> >>>>get?
> >>>>Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 10:53:34 -0400
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Cheryl,
> >>>>>Would you elaborate? What did you get in the
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>way
> >>
> >>
> >>>>of political
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>screed??
> >>>>>Maybe you and Mark are not on the same page? I
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>have not seen much
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>overtly political on the list lately.
> >>>>>I run two sets of filters to stop spam and when
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>some gets your
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>direct email address, no matter how, they can
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>devise email spams to get by
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>them. I am now occasionally getting funky
> stuff
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>from Germany.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Again, what happened?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Ed K
> >>>>>Greenville, SC, USA
> >>>>>Political Addendum:
> >>>>>Killing the human spirit
> >>>>>What do I mean by the return of the spirit [to
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>the workplace].
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>First, let me quote Ayn Rand about spirit: "The
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>quickest way to kill the
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>human spirit is to ask someone to do mediocre
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>work."
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>When business and government were asking people
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>not to do their
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>best, they were telling the workers, in
> essence,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>to lie to their customers.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Even though the workers knew they could have
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>done
> >>
> >>
> >>>>better, they weren't
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>supposed to. Because the old paradigm preached
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>that to do it right the first
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>time cost too much.
> >>>>>The cost that was never build into that
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>statement
> >>
> >>
> >>>>was the cost of
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>the workers' integrity. Not doing your best but
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>presenting it as your best
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>is a lie. And lying corrupts the soul.
> >>>>>Joel Arthur Barker, Paradigms: The Business of
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>Discovering the
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Future. (New York: HarperCollins Publishers),
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>1993
> >>
> >>
> >>>>(1992), p. 137.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>__________________________________________________
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil
> is
> >>>>that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke, Irish
> >>>>philosopher
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>__________________________________________________
> >>
> >>
> >>>>Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> >>>>www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Yahoo! Mail
> >>>Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take
> the
> >>>
> >>>
> >>tour:
> >>
> >>
> >>>http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
> >>>
>
>>>__________________________________________________
> >>>Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>
> >>__________________________________________________
> >>Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> >>www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Mail
> >Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the
> tour:
> >http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> www.rhodes22.org/list
> >
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> www.rhodes22.org/list
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Make Yahoo! your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
More information about the Rhodes22-list
mailing list