[Rhodes22-list] Scotch was Enemy of the State? Or maybe
scotch is the enemy of the state
Slim
salm at mn.rr.com
Mon Aug 7 01:22:32 EDT 2006
Ohmygod Brad, you ordered scotch and water in Scotland? Heresy!
Naturally, I'm on a first-name-basis with most of the liquor vendors in the
state of Minnesota. Matt sells Dewars for $17 per liter. It's the lowest
price I've ever seen--even in duty-free shops. And that's not a sale price,
it's the regular price. I asked Matt if he could do any better if I bought
a case and he said he'd throw in an extra bottle. That makes it $16+ per
bottle. He calls it the "Slim deal." BTW, I take it neat with a splash.
On 8/6/06 5:35 AM, "Brad Haslett" <flybrad at gmail.com> wrote:
> Slim,
>
> Ahh, Macalens! Good choice laddy! I usually buy J&B unless Dewars or
> Johnnie Walker is on sale. Glen Fiddich is a favorite as well. I've
> given my first wife a bottle of Famous Grouse every Christmas for over
> twenty years.
>
> Once while flying international, I laid over in Prestwick, Scotland
> and stayed at the Royal Troon golf course. I hiked into town, found a
> pub, and ordered a scotch and water, something I recognized from the
> States. The whole pub went quiet as if I had just farted. One of the
> patrons welcomed me and then suggested that perhaps I'd enjoy one of
> the local malts a bit more, sans the water. It was tough enough to
> understand their English through the brogue and impossible after a few
> rounds of 96 octane. It's still one of my top ten scotch experiences.
>
> Brad
>
> On 8/6/06, Slim <salm at mn.rr.com> wrote:
>> Thanks, Brad. I like the Dalmore but favor the Macalens. But tonight it's
>> Dewars. I haven't had a good idea since I poured my last drink.
>>
>> Slim
>>
>> On 8/6/06 4:43 AM, "Brad Haslett" <flybrad at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Slim,
>>>
>>> Upgrade to a better scotch and you won't babble, you'll become enlightened.
>>> Go to a high-end liquor store and look for Dalmore Cigar Malt. Even better
>>> yet, sip it with a good cigar. Just be sure to record all your thoughts or
>>> you'll have to repeat the experience because you forgot all the good ideas
>>> you had.
>>>
>>> Brad
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/6/06, Slim <salm at mn.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hank,
>>>>
>>>> When I'm drunk, I don't google, I babble. Thanks for digging that up for
>>>> me. I knew someone on this list would have the right answer.
>>>>
>>>> Slim
>>>>
>>>> On 8/5/06 10:14 PM, "Hank" <hnw555 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Slim,
>>>>>
>>>>> You really are drunk. 5 minutes on Google came up with the following.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hank
>>>>>
>>>>>> From http://www.usflag.org/colors.html
>>>>>
>>>>> The quote below concerning *gold fringe on the Flag* is from the book
>>>> "So
>>>>> Proudly We Hail, The History of the United States Flag" Smithsonian
>>>>> Institute Press 1981, by Wiliam R. Furlong and Byron McCandless. "The
>>>>> placing of a fringe on Our Flag is optional with the person of
>>>> organization,
>>>>> and no Act of Congress or Executive Order either prohibits the practice,
>>>>> according to the Institute of Hearaldry. Fringe is used on indoor flags
>>>>> only, as fringe on flags on outdoor flags would deteriorate rapidly. The
>>>>> fringe on a Flag is considered and 'honorable enrichment only', and its
>>>>> official use by the US Army dates from 1895.. A 1925 Attorney General's
>>>>> Opinion states: 'the fringe does not appear to be regarded as an
>>>> integral
>>>>> part of the Flag, and its presence cannot be said to constitute an
>>>>> unauthorized addition to the design prescribed by statute. An external
>>>>> fringe is to be distinguished from letters, words, or emblematic designs
>>>>> printed or superimposed upon the body of the flag itself. Under law,
>>>> such
>>>>> additions might be open to objection as unauthorized; but the same is
>>>> not
>>>>> necessarily true of the fringe.'"
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/5/06, Slim <salm at mn.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've had too much to drink tonight but here goes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We all know the American flag has its 13 stripes and its 50 stars on a
>>>>>> field
>>>>>> of blue, but did you know that the design and specifications of the
>>>> flag
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> an act of congress? Yes--it's legislated that the flag be exactly such
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> such and that all its qualities and proportions are exactly
>>>>>> specified. Any
>>>>>> deviation from that and it ceases to be the official flag of the United
>>>>>> States of America. Presumably, all countries do this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The United States military, however, operates under a different
>>>>>> flag. They
>>>>>> put a gold fringe around their flag. So do many police forces. This
>>>> is
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> insignificant! They are not displaying the flag of the United States
>>>> of
>>>>>> America! By an act of congress, you can't alter the specs of the flag
>>>> in
>>>>>> any way and still call it the official flag of the USA. There ain't no
>>>>>> gold
>>>>>> fringe on Old Glory!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So what gives? It would seem the military operates under a separate
>>>>>> sovereignty and a flag of their own. First I'd like to know why, and
>>>>>> second
>>>>>> I would like to know if this "nation" is friend or foe.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Slim
>>>>>>
>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>>>
>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>>
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
More information about the Rhodes22-list
mailing list