[Rhodes22-list] BR New Design
Slim
salm at mn.rr.com
Tue Feb 7 13:14:13 EST 2006
Bill,
Actually I can and sometime do set up both PTE and BR at the same time.
I've seen those quick release shroud thingies. They would certainly help.
On that note, I wish I could find one with an 8" throw to use on the forward
lowers and eliminate the extensions for raising and lowering the mast.
Slim
On 2/7/06 7:56 AM, "Bill Effros" <bill at effros.com> wrote:
> Slim,
>
> It appears that your PTE cannot be installed at the same time as your
> BR. As I understand the new design, it will be possible to install the
> BR over the PTE, and still pass the "Drunk Chick Dark Test" (DCDT). The
> new design will be something between your BR and the one featured on the
> R-22 site, which I have attached. The PTE is mounted under the boom,
> the BR will be mounted over the boom.
>
> I still see many times when I would prefer the speed and simplicity of
> the PTE, set at the last minute, to the more complex BR; and other times
> when I would want to set the BR, or Sun Shade, without the PTE, and
> still other times when I might want the PTE and BR at the same time
> (When one person is awake and another is asleep.)
>
> When I set up my PTE early, I generally don't attach all the front
> snaps, or zip it up. This allows me to continue using my hatches for
> ventilation until I go to sleep. Some variation of this should be
> possible for the BR to allow re-entry to the cabin from the bow.
>
> I have seen turnbuckles that open like a jackknife to release the
> tension without resetting the turnbuckle. Sort of a quick release
> mechanism that might be useful for this purpose. Since turnbuckles
> just screw on and off the rigging, this might answer some of your
> concerns about set-up--they could easily be added to any rigging.
>
> In any case, I would continue to carry both my PTE and my new design BR,
> and I would deploy both at different times. If I didn't have either
> one, I don't know which I would buy first, but I think both should be
> designed so that neither requires the purchase of the other. As we gain
> experience with them, we will better understand which device is used
> more often.
>
> Um...about Roger's design...have you looked at it lately? I have
> attached it, too. When Stan said said "ugly is OK" I don't think he was
> picturing this in his mind. Also, note the distance between the boom
> and the room. This is a short person's boom room. It seems to have bow
> entry problems of its own. I don't think we have much to take from this
> design beyond the fact that the enclosure is useful and this design is
> not the way to go.
>
> I'd love to see Art's design. It sounds like a foundation for the
> direction we are heading. I am trying to understand it better, and will
> take all the help I can get.
>
> Integrating the PTE dodger design with your awning design looks like a
> natural, but apparently doesn't work. The MacGregor version has only a
> fraction of the utility and coverage at 5 times Stan's projected cost.
> (Picture also attached.)
>
> I agree that we still have assembly problems to address, but my
> inclination is to go in the direction recommended by Stan. If I could
> buy a boom room like yours for $1000, I would do so in a heartbeat.
>
> Bill Effros
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Slim wrote:
>
>> OK, look, there's one thing that all agree upon--the pop top enclosure is
>> too good to be true. I could go on and on about how easy it is to set up
>> and take down; doesn't require any frame; you can motor and/or sail with it
>> up; provides standing head room under cover; has roll-up storm flaps/screen
>> windows; easily stowable; is the first defense against the weather; already
>> beautifully engineered and available for about a grand. What could be
>> better?
>>
>> Then comes the cockpit extension. The cockpit room extension of the PTE.
>> In my opinion, everyone who is interested in expanding the use of their boat
>> should have the PTE first. Period. Then why should the boom room make the
>> already-perfect PTE obsolete? Why not integrate?
>>
>> My guess would be that Stan wants to offer an either/or type of option so
>> you could either spend a grand on the PTE or spend a grand on the Boom
>> Room--your choice--but you won't have to spend two grand to enclose the
>> cockpit. You could spend one grand for a stand-alone BR like mine. But
>> since nobody DOESN'T want the PTE, or already has one, why not go from
>> there? Sort of a step one and step two enclosure system.
>>
>> The two inherent problems with my boom room are the issue with the shrouds
>> and access to the bow. Stan seems to be sticking to that design. Art's
>> design lacks those flaws. So does Roger's. Let's put the best feature of
>> each of them together and get rid of the problems.
>>
>> It wouldn't take more than a couple zippers and some velcro to integrate a
>> boom tent to the PTE and make it splendid. OK, so you have to spend two
>> grand for the whole thing. Anybody complaining? In theory, I wouldn't
>> hesitate to sell my stand-alone BR for what I've got in it ($500) and turn
>> around and spend a G on something else that's new and perfect. Something
>> that can be set up by two drunk chicks in the dark!
>>
>> Slim
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>>
>>
>>
>
> Name: The Boom Room.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 299575 bytes Desc: not
> available
> Url:
>
http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attch/200602/07/TheBoomRoom.jp>
g
>
> Name: Bimini Room 2.bmp Type: image/bmp Size: 982036 bytes Desc: not available
> Url:
>
http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attch/200602/07/BiminiRoom2.bi>
n
>
> Name: Bimini Room 1.bmp Type: image/bmp Size: 836263 bytes Desc: not available
> Url:
>
http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attch/200602/07/BiminiRoom1.bi>
n
>
> Name: MacG Stern Rail Bimini Enclosure 7.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 391474
> bytes Desc: not available
> Url:
> http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attch/200602/07/MacGSternRailB
> iminiEnclosure7.jpg
>
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
More information about the Rhodes22-list
mailing list