[Rhodes22-list] Reply, controversy, Dave, Jim

[Rik Sandberg]

I don't know Brad. That guy might have been from a little further out 
there than left field :-)

Rik

brad haslett wrote:
> Rik,
>
> Left field?  By the way, you do know that the levees
> were intentionally blown-up in NOLA, right?  Actually,
> they were in 1927 but that is another story.  Here is
> a quote from the JAN 06 issue of AOPA (Aircraft Owners
> and Pilots Association) magazine from a former FAA
> administrator that sums it up well-
>
> "Aviation news occurs when the uninformed are
> interviewed by the unqualified to produce drivel for
> the uneducated"
>                         Langhorne Bond
>
> Brad
>
>                   
>
> --- Rik Sandberg <sanderico at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>   
>> Ed,
>>
>> Lord knows I'm no engineer, but here's a link for
>> ya'
>>
>>
>>     
> http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html
>   
>> Hydrogen bomb ...... where the F*** do these people
>> come from ?.?.?.?.?
>>
>> Rik
>>
>> Tootle (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
>>     
>>> Dave and Jim:
>>>       Dave wrote, "There's so much wrong with it
>>>       
>> that it's hard to  know
>>     
>>> where to start."
>>>       Jim wrothe, "Paranoid, scientifically
>>>       
>> indefensible crap."
>>     
>>> Both of you guys are doing what the writer did. 
>>>       
>> Well maybe he actually did
>>     
>>> it better because 
>>> he posted pictures visually illustrating his
>>>       
>> thesis.   It may be wrong and
>>     
>>> crap, but why?  If you 
>>> are going to reply, why not post a couple of
>>>       
>> defensible facts illustrating
>>     
>>> why it is wrong.  You 
>>> guys may both be capable of defending your
>>>       
>> positions, but unless you do it
>>     
>>> good style, we will
>>> never know  the truth.  
>>>
>>> It is popular these days to make outrageous
>>>       
>> statements without supporting
>>     
>>> facts.   This occurs
>>> every day in the press.  If you repeat a lie often
>>>       
>> enough, there are those
>>     
>>> who believe it.  Not 
>>> everybody has the ability to disect every subject.
>>>       
>>  
>>     
>>> Here is a topic that you two appear to have
>>>       
>> ability to shed truth on.  Both
>>     
>>> of you just walk 
>>> away and let a falsehood stand?  Snopes does not
>>>       
>> address this latest
>>     
>>> internet stuff yet.  We 
>>> need to you to step up to the plate and at least
>>>       
>> get on base.
>>     
>>> This may be a sailing forum, however, it members
>>>       
>> are a powerful cross
>>     
>>> section of America.  
>>> Some of its members do possess the talents needed
>>>       
>> to refute thiese latest
>>     
>>> internet comments.
>>>
>>> Ed K
>>> Greenville, SC, USA
>>> Addendum,  “I know quite certainly that I myself
>>>       
>> have no special talent;
>>     
>>> curiosity, obsession and dogged endurance,
>>>       
>> combined with self-criticism,
>>     
>>> have brought me to my ideas.” 
>>>  Albert Einstein 
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>>       
> http://www.nabble.com/It-is-time-for-some-controversy-t1079919.html#a2819312
>   
>>> Sent from the Rhodes22 forum at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
>>>       
>> www.rhodes22.org/list
>>     
>>>   
>>>       
>> __________________________________________________
>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
>> www.rhodes22.org/list
>>
>>     
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>
>