[Rhodes22-list] Politics--Ted Koppel on Iraq

[Brad Haslett]

You may recall the discussion we had a couple of years ago after the US sold
some bunker busting bombs to Israel.  It is my hope that before the shooting
stops in the current fight,  Israel "tests" a couple of these on Iran's
nuclear reactor.  Here is Victor Hansen's latest assessment.

Brad


Private Papers
www.victorhanson.com

*July 21, 2006**
**A Strange War**
Israel is at last being given an opportunity to unload on jihadists.*
by Victor Davis Hanson
*National Review Online*

*S*um up the declarations of Hezbollah's leaders, Syrian diplomats, Iranian
nuts, West Bank terrorists, and Arab commentators — and this latest Middle
East war seems one of the strangest in a long history of strange conflicts.
For example, have we ever witnessed a conflict in which one of the
belligerents — Iran — that shipped thousands of rockets into Lebanon, and
promises that it will soon destroy Israel, vehemently denies that its own
missile technicians are on the ground in the Bekka Valley. Wouldn't it wish
to brag of such solidarity?

Or why, after boasting of the new targets that his lethal missiles will hit
in Israel , does Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah ("We are ready for
it — war, war on every level") now harp that Israel is hitting too deep into
Lebanon ? Don't enemies expect one another to hit deep? Isn't that what "war
on every level" is all about?

Meanwhile, why do the G-8 or the United Nations even talk of putting more
peacekeeping troops into southern Lebanon, when in the past such rent-a-cops
and uniformed bystanders have never stopped hostilities? Does anyone
remember that it was Hezbollah who blew up French and American troops who
last tried to provide "stability" between the warring parties?

Why do not Iran and Syria — or for that matter other Arab states — now
attack Israel to join the terrorists that they have armed? Surely the
two-front attack by Hamas and Hezbollah could be helped by at least one
conventional Islamic military. After promising us all year that he was going
to "wipe out" Israel , is not this the moment for Mr. Ahmadinejad to strike?

And why — when Hezbollah rockets are hidden in apartment basements, then
brought out of private homes to target civilians in Israel — would
terrorists who exist to murder noncombatants complain that some "civilians"
have been hit? Would not they prefer to lionize "martyrs" who helped to
store their arms?

*W*e can answer these absurdities by summing up the war very briefly. Iran and
Syria feel the noose tightening around their necks — especially the ring of
democracies in nearby Afghanistan , Iraq , Turkey , and perhaps Lebanon .
Even the toothless U.N. finally is forced to focus on Iranian nukes and
Syrian murder plots. And neither Syria can overturn the Lebanese government
nor can Iran the Iraqi democracy. Instead, both are afraid that their
rhetoric may soon earn some hard bombing, since their "air defenses" are
hardly defenses at all.

So they tell Hamas and Hezbollah to tap their missile caches, kidnap a few
soldiers, and generally try to turn the world's attention to the collateral
damage inflicted on "refugees" by a stirred-up Zionist enemy.

For their part, the terrorist killers hope to kidnap, ransom, and send off
missiles, and then, when caught and hit, play the usual victim card of
racism, colonialism, Zionism, and about every other -ism that they think
will win a bailout from some guilt-ridden, terrorist-frightened, Jew-hating,
or otherwise oil-hungry Western nation.

The only difference from the usual scripted Middle East war is that this
time, privately at least, most of the West, and perhaps some in the Arab
world as well, want Israel to wipe out Hezbollah, and perhaps hit Syria or Iran
. The terrorists and their sponsors know this, and rage accordingly when
their military impotence is revealed to a global audience — especially after
no reprieve is forthcoming to save their "pride" and "honor."

After all, for every one Israeli Hezbollah kills, they lose ten. You are not
winning when "victory" is assessed in terms of a single hit on an Israeli
warship. Their ace-in-the-hole strategy — emblematic of the entire pathetic
Islamist way of war — is that they can disrupt the good Western life of
their enemies that they are both attracted to and thus also hate. But,
as Israel
has shown, a Western public can be quite willing to endure shelling if it
knows that such strikes will lead to a devastating counter-response.

*W*hat should the United States do? If it really cares about human life and
future peace, then we should talk ad nauseam about "restraint" and
"proportionality" while privately assuring Israel the leeway to smash both
Hamas and Hezbollah — and humiliate Syria and Iran, who may well come off
very poorly from their longed-for but bizarre war.

Only then will Israel restore some semblance of deterrence and strengthen
nascent democratic movements in both Lebanon and even the West Bank . This
is the truth that everyone from London to Cairo knows, but dares not speak.
So for now, let us pray that the brave pilots and ground commanders of the
IDF can teach these primordial tribesmen a lesson that they will not soon
forget — and thus do civilization's dirty work on the other side of the
proverbial Rhine.

In this regard, it is time to stop the silly slurs that American policy in
the Middle East is either in shambles or culpable for the present war. In
fact, if we keep our cool, the Bush doctrine is working. Both Afghans and
Iraqis each day fight and kill Islamist terrorists; neither was doing so
before 9/11. Syria and Iran have never been more isolated; neither was
isolated when Bill Clinton praised the "democracy" in Tehran or when an
American secretary of State sat on the tarmac in Damascus for hours to pay
homage to Syria 's gangsters. Israel is at last being given an opportunity
to unload on jihadists; that was impossible during the Arafat fraud that
grew out of the Oslo debacle. Europe is waking up to the dangers of radical
Islamism; in the past, it bragged of its aid and arms sales to terrorist
governments from the West Bank to Baghdad .

Some final observations on Hezbollah and Hamas. There is no longer a Soviet
deterrent to bail out a failed Arab offensive. There is no longer empathy
for poor Islamist "freedom fighters." The truth is that it is an open
question as to which regime — Iran or Syria — is the greater international
pariah. After a recent trip to the Middle East, I noticed that the
unfortunate prejudicial stares given to a passenger with an Iranian passport
were surpassed only by those accorded another on his way to Damascus .

So after 9/11, the London bombings, the Madrid murders, the French riots,
the Beslan atrocities, the killings in India, the Danish cartoon debacle,
Theo Van Gogh, and the daily arrests of Islamic terrorists trying to blow
up, behead, or shoot innocent people around the globe, the world is sick of
the jihadist ilk. And for all the efforts of the BBC, Reuters, Western
academics, and the horde of appeasers and apologists that usually bail these
terrorist killers out when their rhetoric finally outruns their muscle, this
time they can't.

Instead, a disgusted world secretly wants these terrorists to get what they
deserve. And who knows: This time they just might.

(c)2006 Victor Davis Hanson