[Rhodes22-list] Bad Tack
Bill Effros
bill at effros.com
Fri Jul 28 08:23:19 EDT 2006
Brad,
In airplane crashes the operators always call it pilot error and the
union always looks for mechanical problems. What's your take?
Bill Effros
Brad Haslett wrote:
> Got a phone call today from the dealer who sold us our new dump truck in
> Gulfport about a plane crash. The dealer was flying two customers to the
> Mayo Clinic but the Citation Jet landed in Cresco, Iowa, ran off the
> runway,
> killed the pilots, and seriousily injured the two passengers. As
> usual, the
> news agencies don't know squat about aviation or the accident, but
> write the
> story as if they were experts. I can only guess that if they're so FOS
> about
> airplanes, they are probably FOS about everything else they
> cover. Disgusting! Anyway, while researching that, I came across several
> news accounts of the cruise line incident that happened last week.
> Here is
> an explanation that seems on the surface to make the most sense.
> Sounds like
> it was a tack gone bad.
>
> Brad
>
> -------------------------------
>
> WESH.COM I-Team: Cruise Ship's List Caused By Human Error
> Jul 21,2006 00:00 by WESH.COM
> *ORLANDO, Fla. -- *WESH 2 News has learned the accident involving a
> Princess
> Cruise ship was due to human error, not a mechanical malfunction.
>
> Two hundred and forty passengers were hurt when the Crown Princess
> listed in
> the open sea off the Brevard County coast.
>
> Two investigators from the National Transportation Safety Board and
> two more
> from the U.S. Coast Guard are riding along on the bridge of the Crown
> Princess as it heads back to its home port in New York.
>
> They're running final tests on the automatic pilot system, but a high
> level
> source has told the WESH 2 I-Team that human error, not the automatic
> pilot,
> caused the accident.
>
> A series of still pictures aboard the Crown Princess on Tuesday afternoon
> showed the chaos and confusion on what was supposed to be the last leg
> of a
> pleasure cruise. The ship, 11 miles out in the Atlantic, tilted
> sharply to
> the port side.
>
> Federal investigators boarded the ship, and almost immediately figured
> out
> what happened. It wasn't a computer glitch. It wasn't a mechanical
> problem.
>
> A high-level source, who asked not to be identified for fear of losing
> his
> or her job, told the WESH 2 I-Team it was simple human error.
>
> "The public needs to know. The ship is safe. There is nothing wrong
> with the
> automatic pilot system. It was human error. They made a mistake. Mistakes
> happen," the source said.
>
> Here's how our source explains what happened.
>
> After clearing Port Canaveral, the captain set the ship's automatic
> pilot to
> head to New York. He then left the cruise line's bridge. All standard and
> appropriate procedure.
>
> As the automatic pilot found its course back to New York, it started
> making
> a left turn when the person in charge on the bridge -- a junior
> officer --
> noticed the ship's automatic pilot needle was far to the left.
>
> Our source goes on to tell us that the junior officer "panicked," then
> took
> the ship out of automatic pilot thinking the meter was showing that
> the ship
> was turning too sharply to one side.
>
> But instead of turning the Crown Princess back to the right, the junior
> officer accidentally kept the ship in an even sharper left hand turn --
> almost like over-correcting in a car.
>
> This caused the massive 113,000-ton cruise ship to list severely,
> tumbling
> passengers, pool water and everything else on board into chaos...
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>
More information about the Rhodes22-list
mailing list