[Rhodes22-list] Repost: Iraq Soldier's plea

[KUHN, LELAND]

http://www.ceremonialbugle.com/

It's amazing how good they sound.

Lee
1986 Rhodes22  At Ease
Crab Alley (Kent Island, MD)

-----Original Message-----
From: 3drecon at comcast.net [mailto:3drecon at comcast.net] 
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 4:11 PM
To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Repost: Iraq Soldier's plea

Slim,

It's all on tape now.  I think some of the ceremonial units in DC and
othe showcase places that have musicians have them.

My sister-in-law's father-in-law died.  He was a WWII Navy veteran.  His
friends arranged the with the local VFW to have a small honor guard.  A
couple of old guys in mixed Army Dress Uniforms (Vietnam Era, Post
Vietnam, tucked in boots, one VFW hat, one Beret etc).  They had a bugle
and played taps at the end of it all.  Everyone thought it sounded
"perfect".  Somebody said it was electronic and not a real Bugle!

You think you've seen everything.

Philip


-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: Slim <salm at mn.rr.com> 

> Me in Iraq!? (ooops, sorry, Elle) ...I in Iraq!? Maybe as the bugler.
Do 
> they still have those? 
> 
> Slim 
> 
> On 11/2/06 7:49 AM, "3drecon at comcast.net" <3drecon at comcast.net> wrote:

> 
> > Watch your spelling and grammer Slim, you might get stuck in Iraq! 
> > 
> > Philip 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------- Original message -------------- 
> > From: Slim 
> > 
> >> If they are Minnesotans then they're better edumacated than most. 
> >> ...sniff... 
> >> 
> >> Slim 
> >> 
> >> On 11/1/06 8:38 PM, "Brad Haslett" wrote: 
> >> 
> >>> Bud, 
> >>> 
> >>> According to several sites these 'boys' are from Slim's home turf.
They are 
> >>> identified as being from 1-34 RTB of the 34 Infantry Division (MN
National 
> >>> Guard). 
> >>> 
> >>> Brad 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> On 11/1/06, Bud wrote: 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> See if this one posts.... 
> >>>> 
> >>>> -Bud 
> >>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Name: image0011.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 18485 bytes Desc: not
available 
> >>>> Url: 
> >>>>
http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attch/200611/01/image001
1.j 
> >>>> pg 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> __________________________________________________ 
> >>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>> __________________________________________________ 
> >>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list 
> >> 
> >> __________________________________________________ 
> >> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list 
> > __________________________________________________ 
> > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list 
> 
> __________________________________________________ 
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list From
3drecon at comcast.net  Thu Nov  2 16:12:30 2006
Return-Path: <3drecon at comcast.net>
X-Original-To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
Delivered-To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net
[204.127.200.82])
	by web4.thecenturiongroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AADB71F65
	for <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>; Thu,  2 Nov 2006 16:12:30
-0500 (EST)
Received: from smailcenter69.comcast.net ([204.127.205.169])
	by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP
	id <2006110221122601200ng286e>; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 21:12:26 +0000
Received: from [140.153.24.27] by smailcenter69.comcast.net;
	Thu, 02 Nov 2006 21:12:26 +0000
From: 3drecon at comcast.net
To: The Rhodes 22 mail list <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Know the Enemy
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 21:12:26 +0000
Message-Id:
<110220062112.13843.454A5F39000E9C6900003613220288874402010C0A9D0BCC at com
cast.net>
X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Oct  4 2006)
X-Authenticated-Sender: M2RyZWNvbkBjb21jYXN0Lm5ldA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1+
X-BeenThere: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1+
Precedence: list
Reply-To: The Rhodes 22 mail list <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>

Rummy,
   I know, but it doesn't fit with the OCD label my kids put on me.
   Sometimes Ed K's stuff drives me crazy too ; ' ), but it's fun to
read.

Philip


-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: R22RumRunner at aol.com 

> Hey Philip. No sweat on the spelling, we put up with Michael and Steve
for 
> years. I think we can figure it out. 
> 
> Rummy 
> __________________________________________________ 
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list From
salm at mn.rr.com  Thu Nov  2 19:28:56 2006
Return-Path: <salm at mn.rr.com>
X-Original-To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
Delivered-To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
Received: from ms-smtp-01.rdc-kc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01.rdc-kc.rr.com
	[24.94.166.115])
	by web4.thecenturiongroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E8E1F65
	for <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>; Thu,  2 Nov 2006 19:28:55
-0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([75.72.215.154])
	by ms-smtp-01.rdc-kc.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id
	kA30SrHt020903
	for <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 18:28:54 -0600
(CST)
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 18:28:55 -0600
From: Slim <salm at mn.rr.com>
To: Rhodes22-list <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
Message-ID: <C16FE967.6380%salm at mn.rr.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Voting
X-BeenThere: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1+
Precedence: list
Reply-To: The Rhodes 22 mail list <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>

Can someone please tell me why, in this day and age, we have problems
counting votes?  For chrissake, what could be simpler?  Why do some
states
use questionable methods like punch cards or now, electronic machines
and
online voting?  You KNOW the electronic voting is a disaster looking for
a
place to happen.  Some don't even require a paper back-up in case a
recount
is needed.  OF COURSE there will be hackers AND breakdowns.  What are
they
thinking?  This drives me crazy!  I know I'm being cynical but the
unreliability of these methods make me think they do it IN ORDER FOR
THEM to
f**k with the results!

Here in MN we use one, big single sheet of paper with all the candidates
there and you use a black pen which they supply.  You make a mark next
to
your candidate and it's read by a machine much less
technical/susceptible to
mishaps than an online computer.  We've never had a problem counting
and/or
verifying votes in MN.
KISS!!!!!

BTW, in Brazil, voting is considered more than a civic duty--it's a
personal
obligation and all businesses, schools, etc. are closed for the day and
almost everyone votes.  In this country what, 35% turnout?  Disgraceful!
I take pride in knowing that MN is among the highest turnouts in the
U.S.

Slim

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.