[Rhodes22-list] Christofero

elle watermusic38 at yahoo.com
Tue Jan 9 05:30:10 EST 2007 

OK, Chris...we're getting 'way past the limits of my
language ability...let's try this:

Amperora, ma morire felice e soddisfatto!

> (hmm does a servant serve someone)...yes...hopefully
tastefully arranged on a platter...;^)

elle


--- Geankoplis <napoli68 at charter.net> wrote:

> Ma sera molto cholesterol con quello cibo.
> 
> Your servant, (hmm does a servant serve someone)
> Signore Lechter
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On
> Behalf Of elle
> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 7:51 PM
> To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
> Subject: RE: [Rhodes22-list] Christofero
> 
> Christofero
> 
> Un pane tostato all'uomo!
> 
> elle (come L.)
> 
> 
> --- Geankoplis <napoli68 at charter.net> wrote:
> 
> > Va Bene' Elle,
> > 		Due botiglie di vino!
> > 
> > Christofero (come Colombo)
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> > [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On
> > Behalf Of elle
> > Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 4:56 PM
> > To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
> > Subject: RE: [Rhodes22-list] An inconvenient
> > reality.
> > 
> > Chris,
> > 
> > Keep the beans, unless they're fresh: to some,
> fresh
> > fava are poisonous. Heck, that way we can target
> two
> > populations at the same time. Efficient, no?
> > 
> > Make it two bottles of Chianti. ;^)
> > 
> > elle
> > 
> > 
> > --- Geankoplis <napoli68 at charter.net> wrote:
> > 
> > > Gee Elle,
> > > 	Would you have a few fava beans to go along
> with
> > > that solution, oh
> > > yes, and some nice Chianti?
> > > Chris
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> > > [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On
> > > Behalf Of elle
> > > Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 6:15 PM
> > > To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
> > > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] An inconvenient
> > > reality.
> > > 
> > > Brad, Rummy, Rik and all
> > > 
> > > Jonathan Swift in 1729 may have hit upon the
> > perfect
> > > solution:
> > > 
> > > A Modest Proposal
> > >  
> > > For Preventing The Children of Poor People in
> > > Ireland
> > > >From Being Aburden to Their Parents or Country,
> > and
> > > For Making Them Beneficial to The Public
> > >  
> > > By Jonathan Swift (1729)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > elle
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- Rik Sandberg <sanderico at earthlink.net>
> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Brad, Rummy and all
> > > > 
> > > > I'm gonna' stick a theory in here just for the
> > > heck
> > > > of it.
> > > > 
> > > > To every thing there is a season.......
> > > > 
> > > > Rabbit populations run in cycles, 'round here
> > > ruffed
> > > > grouse too is an 
> > > > obvious one. I expect most other species of
> > animal
> > > > are the same. They 
> > > > increase in number in an area 'til there is
> not
> > > > enough food/resources to 
> > > > support them anymore ....... then they either
> > > leave,
> > > > or die. after a 
> > > > time the food comes back and eventually the
> > > > population starts to rise 
> > > > again, starting the cycle all over again.
> > > > 
> > > > Back in the sixties I used to hear people
> > talking
> > > > about population 
> > > > control all the time. Now, you rarely hear it
> > > > brought up. The human 
> > > > population on our planet surpassed
> 6,000,000,000
> > > > this last winter Yeah, 
> > > > billion with a B. 9,000,000,000 isn't that far
> > > off.
> > > > 
> > > > I don't believe this planet was meant to
> support
> > 6
> > > > billion people for 
> > > > any length of time ..... let alone 9.
> > > > 
> > > > So, distasteful as it may be to some, unless
> we
> > > > figure out a way to have 
> > > > a smaller population, we are likely to go the
> > way
> > > of
> > > > the rabbit and the 
> > > > grouse.
> > > > 
> > > > Maybe we ought to be looking at the real root
> of
> > > our
> > > > problems.
> > > > 
> > > > food for thought
> > > > Rik
> > > > 
> > > > Brad Haslett wrote:
> > > > > Rummy,
> > > > >
> > > > > This sort of thing has been happening for
> > eons. 
> > > > If a scientist from
> > > > > mainstream academia points this out he/she
> > will
> > > be
> > > > booed off the lectern
> > > > > because it doesn't fit into the current
> > funding
> > > > stream.  It may have
> > > > > happened due to global warming, or not. 
> > Global
> > > > warming may be real, or
> > > > > not.  If it is real, it may be caused by man
> > or
> > > > nature. It could be a
> > > > > natural cycle (remember the Ice Age?). The
> > whole
> > > > issue is so clouded 
> > > > > by the
> > > > > political climate that rational discussion
> of
> > > the
> > > > subject is difficult if
> > > > > not impossible.  The bulk of the
> 'scientists'
> > > are
> > > > of the same 
> > > > > political ilk
> > > > > and are hardly objective.
> > > > >
> > > > > Let's assume global warming is real, and the
> > > cause
> > > > is mankind.  What 
> > > > > to do?
> > > > > Maybe we can just let the radical Muslims
> have
> > > > their way and move the 
> > > > > whole
> > > > > planet back to the 7th century.  There's
> > always
> > > > the issue of donkey 
> > > > > gas to
> > > > > deal with but maybe it is easier to handle
> > than
> > > > the 5.9 liter engine 
> > > > > in my
> > > > > Dodge pickup.  I dunno, and neither do these
> > > > "experts".
> > > > >
> > > > > Perhaps I've hung around educated idiots too
> > > much.
> > > >  I'd be a lot more
> > > > > impressed if they could pour piss out of a
> > boot
> > > > without reading the
> > > > > instructions printed on the heel.
> > > > >
> > > > > Brad
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12/29/06, R22RumRunner at aol.com
> > > > <R22RumRunner at aol.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> _http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16390346/_
> > > > >> (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16390346/)
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > __________________________________________________
> > > > >> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> > > > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> > > > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > >
> > > >
> > __________________________________________________
> > > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> > > > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > > protection around 
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com 
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> > > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > 
> > > 
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> > > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around 
> > http://mail.yahoo.com 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> > www.rhodes22.org/list
> > 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> www.rhodes22.org/list
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> www.rhodes22.org/list
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com

More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list