[Rhodes22-list] Loose-Footed Mains
James Barron
jbarron1 at cinci.rr.com
Tue Jul 24 22:29:22 EDT 2007
Robert:
When I click on the link sent by Leland I get the following article from
Sailnet:
Racing sailors in particular are keenly aware that once the breeze pipes
up, you need to make certain adjustments to keep your sail shape optimized.
With a mainsail, that begins with tweaking the halyard to achieve a luff
tension that's in the ballpark for the given conditions. Then-if your boat
has a standard Marconi rig-you'll begin making adjustments to the backstay,
outhaul, and cunningham to fine-tune the sail's overall shape. Of course,
the most frequent adjustments are made using the traveler and the
mainsheet, and on board the most aggressively raced sailboats, the latter
is rarely cleated.
Of all these controls, perhaps the one most overlooked by non-racing
sailors is the outhaul. Most boat owners follow the 'set it and forget it'
approach with this control line. But a properly attended outhaul can afford
you surprising control over the lower portion of most mainsails. I say most
mainsails because there are different design approaches to the foot section
of these sails. On the vast majority of mainsails, you either have a foot
that's attached to the boom via slides or a bolt rope, or you have what is
known as a loose-footed arrangement wherein just the tack and some portion
of the clew are attached.
It used to be that 90 percent of mainsails seen on board recreational
sailboats were constructed with an attached foot. However, that situation
started to change during the 1980s after America's Cup sail designers began
experimenting with loose-footed mainsails. As with most sail design
innovations, permutations of this approach eventually trickled down to the
recreational arena and became commonplace. These days, the majority of new
mainsails are designed with a loose-footed arrangement.
But, besides attachment methods, what really are the differences between a
loose-footed mainsail and one that's attached along the boom? Proponents of
the former will tell you that loose-footed mainsails are easier to rig and
de-rig because there are fewer attachment points and less hardware
involved. Consequently, there's almost always less friction as well, which
is a boon to those trimming the outhaul. Equally important is the fact that
a loose-footed mainsail enables you to more easily rig reefing lines by
tying the bitter end around the boom. And some sailors will tell you that
having a loose-footed mainsail makes it imminently easier tie on a boom
preventer, but I recommend you affix preventer lines to the boom by using
dedicated hardware like a padeye. (Most booms aren't designed to sustain
the point loading that is likely to occur when you tie a piece of line
around the spar's midsection and subject it to high loads.) A further
advantage to loose footed mainsails is that they make it possible to load
full battens into the sail when it's not already bent on the boom, and that
is often easier and more convenient.
Are there disadvantages to loose-footed mainsails? Yes, but these are
relatively minor. First, while sailing close-hauled with the mainsail
trimmed in hard and the outhaul taut, some loose-footed mainsails will
produce foot flutter. On board most boats, this is really more of an
annoyance than a performance detractor. And second, some long-range
cruising sailors customarily use the foot of their mainsail to collect
rainwater. Depending upon the amount of rainfall, this can be a pretty
efficient collector, and you obviously can't do that with a loose-footed
mainsail.
What about mainsails with an attached foot? What advantages does this
system offer? The only true advantage to this system is that it allows the
mainsail to have a conventional shelf-foot built into it. A shelf foot is
characteristically a lighter weight piece of cloth that is sewn along the
foot of the sail from the tack to the clew. This section also connects to
the mainsail along the boom, ordinarily via slides or a bolt rope. When the
outhaul is loosened, the shelf opens up to produce a fuller shape in that
portion of the sail. When the outhaul is tightened, the shelf essentially
closes up and flattens alongside the boom. The downside is that the
hardware involved (slides or bolt rope) will eventually increase the cost
of maintaining the sail due to the wear and tear of these items.
It should be clear at this stage why the majority of sail designers these
days favor loose-footed mainsails. Neither concept offers a significant
performance advantage under sail for most types of boats, but the
loose-footed approach can provide significant advantages from a maintenance
and equipment handling standpoint. Also, the fact that almost any existing
boom can accommodate a loose-footed arrangement, but an attached foot
mainsail requires a boom with either a foot groove or a track further
strengthens the loose-footed argument. Of course every sailboat has its
idiosyncrasies-as do most owners-so discuss these options with your
sailmaker before you commit one way or the other. If you do that first,
you'll be much happier no matter what option you choose.
About the Author: Dan Dickison is known throughout the sailing community
for his in-depth articles on a variety of sailing topics. His resume
includes stints as a staff editor at Sailing World, Editorial Director of
SailNet, and Editor of Practical Sailor. In those capacities he has written
principally about racing, sail handling, and maintenance. He has also
written over 50 freelance articles that have appeared in major sailing
publications around the world.
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Skinner
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 7:53 PM
To: The Rhodes 22 mail list
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Loose-Footed Mains
Nothing showed up. What am I missing?
/Robert
Leland wrote:
>
> http://www.sailnet.com/forums/showthread.php?t=35266
> http://www.sailnet.com/forums/showthread.php?t=35266
> --
> View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Loose-Footed-Mains-tf4137717.html#a11768785
> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
--
Robert Skinner "Squirrel Haven"
Gorham, Maine 04038-1331
s/v "Little Dipper" & "Edith P."
__________________________________________________
Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
More information about the Rhodes22-list
mailing list