[Rhodes22-list] Rhodes List Replies and necessity of test message

[bobmellor]

ed..

i'm confused once again....
Jim had his original post as well as posting 2 replies....  what's the
issue?
Might we just welcome jim to read and contribute as he sees fit rather than
present such and unfriendly post?

bob mellor  






Tootle wrote:
> 
> James Dickson of Quakertown Pennsylvania:
> 
>  
> 
> Recently a message was posted to the list alleged to have been sent by
> you.
> There have been several responses to your message, but you have failed to
> reply to the Rhodes 22 list acknowledging those messages.  Was the message
> attributed to you posted in error?  List members gave you the curtsey of
> answers to your questions.  If in fact the alleged message attributed to
> you
> was real, then 'all list members' would enjoy your responses. and there
> would be no need for long time list members to post messages labeled
> 'test'
> because there would be jabber hereon.  
> 
>  
> 
> Therefore, you are cordially invited to respond.  
> 
>  
> 
> Reply to:  rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> 
>  
> 
> Ed K
> 
> Greenville, SC, USA
> 
> Addendum:
> 
> Suppose you were an idiot.
> 
> And suppose you were a member of Congress
> 
> But then I repeat myself
> 
> -Mark Twain
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Rhodes-List-Replies-and-necessity-of-test-message-tf3874833.html#a10980583
Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.