[Rhodes22-list] Marine Radar detectors, etc. (reposted w/ proper subject line)
Robert Skinner
robert at squirrelhaven.com
Thu Sep 20 10:40:38 EDT 2007
"Arthur H. Czerwonky" wrote:
> Robert,
> Where would you find the plotting radar ping detector?
> Would it cover the normal bandwidths fully?
================================================
Art, here are some thoughts:
I wish I knew where a plotting radar ping detector could
be had at any price. The problem is that unless the ping
originates under your control, you cannot get a distance
reading - no elapsed time info. Not something I'll wait
for.
--------------------------
The bearing info is possible to suss out, given some sort
of directional antenna, but would be pretty expensive on
a one-off basis. Apparently, such a device is on the
market. See:
http://www.survivalsafety.com/
(quoting another) The best option available is called a
Collision Avoidance Radar Detector. They sell for somewhere
around $500.
In foggy conditions- exactly the conditions you would
really want a radar warning receiver- a small boat might
become invisible to marine radar due to temperature
gradients. The same effect might reduce the range of the
radar warning receiver.
Marine radars operate on X band and S band.
(end quote)
(another opinion) If you are going to run in open water
or commercial shipping lanes the Collision Avoidance
Radar Detector (CARD)is must and is very cheap insurance.
Every boat that I venture out into the Gulf of Mexico
now will have a least a working 5 mile radar and the
CARD. If running in fog or at night keep the radio
turned on the hailing channel. Another inexpensive piece
of equipment that you can use is a Radar Reflector.
This is metallic shape with right angles, newer ones make
you really lite up, that will greatly improve your
signature on someones radar screen even if your boat is
equipped with a tuna tower or flying bridge. Back in the
pretransistor days we wanted to be stealthy to keep our
fishing spots secret, not anymore.
I dont have the specs on the new 35 mile radar but the
old one we had operated in the X-band. You also might
want check with the radar detector makers about using a
360? detector on a boat. If you detect a signal start
looking and talking
(end quote)
--------------------------------
There is talk of encoding ping info with the boat ID,
which would at least let you know that the Cat is in
the vicinity. Nothing tangible that I have heard of
yet. Not a good bet.
There is also talk of transponders on boats, like those
on aircraft, that would give ID info, also warning of
the Cat's presence, but that would require initiating a
signal to trigger it. If you have to initiate a signal,
you might as well go with a regular radar rig.
If you rigged a transponder on your own boat, it could
enhance your radar signature beyond what a normal radar
reflector would do. But if the Cat is within 1/2 mile,
they probably can't see you no matter what you do.
(quoting) I believe there are minimum ranges that radar
can see due to clutter. If you're moored in a harbor and
start out when a large vessell is 1/2 mile away, they
may never see you. Plus, would they know you compared to
the large rock behind you. Maybe not.
I don't trust radar reflectors unless you are in open
ocean.
(end quote)
Frankly, even if the Cat could see you, it might not
alter course anyway. It has no props to get tangled in
your rigging as it pulverizes you, so why would they
care? No witnesses...
I figure that I'll have to take responsibility for my
own safety, no matter what the law says or does -- just
like on shore.
-------------------------------------
References:
http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=144969&page=1
http://www.survivalsafety.com/
---------------------------------------
Hope this helps shed some light on the subject,
--
Robert Skinner "Squirrel Haven"
Gorham, Maine 04038-1331
s/v "Little Dipper" & "Edith P."
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: Robert Skinner <robert at squirrelhaven.com>
> >I'm thinking that a major radar reflector AND plotting
> >radar ping detector might be a damn good idea. We Maine
> >cruisers now have to deal with a 55 MPH catamaran ferry:...
More information about the Rhodes22-list
mailing list