[Rhodes22-list] Herb and using Pete's Subject Line in posts to the Rhodes List

[Herb Parsons]

Yep, I'm pretty bad about not changing subject lines. However, in my 
defense, one of them was a response to his post, (so it was appropriate 
to leave as is), the other was sort of tongue in cheek.

Besides that, when I'm "having fun" (which is what this post is for for 
me), I'm notoriously lazy. Truth be told, you'll probably have more 
success on changing the abortion issue that correcting that character 
flaw. It's one of many that I have.

On the flip side, in my life as an IT professional (though I just got a 
promotion, so I'm moving more to management), I almost anal about such 
things to the opposite degree. But, you'd have to visit me at work to 
see that.

Let's get back to correcting the pesky killing 40 million plus "human 
entities"  issue instead.

Tootle wrote:
> Herb,
>
> We have all gotten the message that Peter L.'s computer machine is screwed
> up.  But do you have to emphasis his error by continuing the same subject
> line in all those posts?  That is why some complain.  When shooting back at
> Elle, say that in the subject line.  You are a bad example to another
> computer literate, Michael W., who occassionally changes the subject line,
> but seems to be following your example.
>
> Now if you know how to fix Peter's machine, post the answer.  
>
> So when are you sailing to Mexico?
>
> Ed K
> Greenville, SC, USA
> attachment:
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p16417973/Calling%2Bfor%2BStan.gif
> Calling+for+Stan.gif 
>