[Rhodes22-list] bill?

Herb Parsons hparsons at parsonsys.com
Fri Dec 5 16:28:04 EST 2008


Excuse me. I never said you called anyone a bigot. I specifically said:

"You were the one that made comments about possible bigotry,"

You did. Sorry if the questions are uncomfortable or difficult for you 
to answer. Might I suggest that if you don't like such questions, you 
don't make such stupid insinuations to begin with?

Just a suggestion.



Robert Skinner wrote:
> Herb,
>
> You are as twisty as a pole dancer's knickers.
> Gotta give you credit for that.  But you must
> acknowledge that I did not call Brad a bigot.
> What I said was "this is uncomfortably close
> to the line between humor and bad taste."
>
> You will notice, should you care to indulge in
> a dose of reality, that I did not mention
> Palin, "mooselini", "ya'llsville", or "double
> standards."
>
> You have no cause for complaint.  Moreover,
> Brad is big enough to take care of himself.
> Do you pile on just for fun?
>
> Further, I know of no regulation that says I
> have to answer your question, assertion, contumely,
> or other form of communication.  However I said
> what I have to say on the subject of standards -
> one to a customer.
>
> I'll grant you that your interpretation of god's
> word is just as valid as Osama's.  Or are there
> two gods?  Maybe one to a customer?  Now there's
> a question for you!
>
> I surmise that you have already enjoyed the
> horse you rode in on, so that leaves just
> you needing attention...  Enjoy!
>
> /Robert, ME
>
> Herb Parsons wrote:
>   
>> Which, of course, entirely avoids answering my question.
>>
>> It was pretty simple.
>>
>> If Brad laughing at a tasteless joke (in my opinion, it was), like that 
>> makes him appear to come off as a bigot; what does stupid statements 
>> like "mooselini" about Palin, or comments about ME being from 
>> "ya'llsville" make THOSE people.
>>
>> You were the one that made comments about possible bigotry, so I'm 
>> asking you the question. What do you think of people that make jokes 
>> about on others based on unfounded generalities?
>>
>> Again, bigotry is bigotry.
>>
>>
>> Robert Skinner wrote:
>>     
>>> Actually, Herb, there are as many standards as there
>>> are people, right or left.  While we tend to group
>>> them in various ways, I have never found two people
>>> who had identical standards -- not even Catholic
>>> priests.
>>>
>>> /Robert, ME
>>>
>>> Herb Parsons wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Waitaminute
>>>>
>>>> If Brad laughing at a tasteless joke (in my opinion, it was), like that 
>>>> makes him appear to come off as a bigot; what does stupid statements 
>>>> like "mooselini" about Palin, or comments about ME being from 
>>>> "ya'llsville" make THOSE people.
>>>>
>>>> The double-standards of the left are simply amazing.
>>>>
>>>> Face it, bigotry is bigotry, whether it's about race or what part of the 
>>>> country a person is from.
>>>>
>>>> Robert Skinner wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> Obama is president-elect, not a pimp.
>>>>>
>>>>> Brad - I'm sure that you don't want to
>>>>> come off as a bigot - I have seen no
>>>>> evidence of that to date - but this is
>>>>> uncomfortably close to the line between
>>>>> humor and bad taste
>>>>>
>>>>> /Robert, ME
>>>>>
>>>>> Brad Haslett wrote:
>>>>>   
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Bill,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You gotta admit, history is being made.  Here's a review of Presidential limos.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.jibjab.com/view/258672
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Brad
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Bill Effros <bill at effros.com> wrote:
>>>>>>     
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> Michael,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I like to think I'm in the "what's best for my country" camp, and
>>>>>>> against the hypocrisy camp.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> George Bush got into office by saying one thing and doing another.  I
>>>>>>> opposed that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Obama got into office the same way.  I oppose that, too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Both men are inexperienced, relying on the knowledge of those
>>>>>>> surrounding them.  It's a bad formula.  The other people in the room
>>>>>>> won't agree on many things.  The least experienced person winds up
>>>>>>> making the decision on a "gut feel".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Both Bush and Obama were selected by political machines as the electable
>>>>>>> face of unelectable policies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It didn't work well for the Republicans.  It's not going to work well
>>>>>>> for the Democrats, either.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As you well know, we've got really really big problems.  Things will
>>>>>>> probably never go back to where they were.  Our country's position is
>>>>>>> likely to deteriorate, along with the position of most individuals.
>>>>>>> There are smarter moves, and dumber moves.  Moves that will leave us
>>>>>>> better off, and moves that will leave us worse off.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Democrats are settling scores--they are not working for the common good.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As you know, I am voting against my pocketbook.  The Democrat's policies
>>>>>>> benefit me.  If I lose, I win.  But, at least I can live with myself,
>>>>>>> having tried to work for what I believe is right.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe if enough people speak up early enough we can stop throwing our
>>>>>>> money into a bottomless pit, and start actually working our way out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bill Effros
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> michael meltzer wrote:
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> Bill I am confused, I will admit it does not take much more me to be in that conduction but.....
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For the most part you have been in the democratic camp, what happened? It seems that "O" has you more than a little pissed off.....
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -mjm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of Bill Effros
>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 7:01 PM
>>>>>>>> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Politics - Palin - Twain
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> David Brooks!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One of the neo-cons who got just about everything wrong for the past 8
>>>>>>>> years!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ben, why didn't you quote this from a more recent column:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Barack Obama and his team should put into action a foreign policy
>>>>>>>> doctrine that builds on some of the ideas developed during George W.
>>>>>>>> Bush's term."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This isn't a football game, and it doesn't matter who you "root" for.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This country is proceeding on an incoherent course which most ordinary
>>>>>>>> Americans can see can't possibly work.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The "Bailout" is already a fiasco -- and make no mistake, it's a
>>>>>>>> Democrat fiasco.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bailing out auto unions is a payoff, plain and simple.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Citibank paid $400 Million to call the new Mets stadium "Citi Field" --
>>>>>>>> and now the taxpayers are giving them their money back--BRILLIANT!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Obama is following exactly the same course Herbert Hoover followed after
>>>>>>>> the stock market crash.  Public works projects.  Rooting for the home team.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It didn't work then, and it won't work now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe, just maybe, there's a better way.  Obama was elected to bring
>>>>>>>> change, not more of the same, and it's never too early to notice the
>>>>>>>> emperor has no clothes on.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Listening to David Brooks is not likely to be the better way, he's just
>>>>>>>> another "well-educated" dope.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bill Effros
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ben Cittadino wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>> Folks;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mr Effros opines that "once again the country has decided to make the
>>>>>>>>> dumbest person in the room the decider".  I agree with Mr. Brooks of the
>>>>>>>>> NYTimes who wrote recently:
>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "November 21, 2008
>>>>>>>>> Op-Ed Columnist
>>>>>>>>> The Insider's Crusade
>>>>>>>>> By DAVID BROOKS
>>>>>>>>> Jan. 20, 2009, will be a historic day. Barack Obama (Columbia, Harvard Law)
>>>>>>>>> will take the oath of office as his wife, Michelle (Princeton, Harvard Law),
>>>>>>>>> looks on proudly. Nearby, his foreign policy advisers will stand beaming,
>>>>>>>>> including perhaps Hillary Clinton (Wellesley, Yale Law), Jim Steinberg
>>>>>>>>> (Harvard, Yale Law) and Susan Rice (Stanford, Oxford D. Phil.).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The domestic policy team will be there, too, including Jason Furman
>>>>>>>>> (Harvard, Harvard Ph.D.), Austan Goolsbee (Yale, M.I.T. Ph.D.), Blair Levin
>>>>>>>>> (Yale, Yale Law), Peter Orszag (Princeton, London School of Economics Ph.D.)
>>>>>>>>> and, of course, the White House Counsel Greg Craig (Harvard, Yale Law).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This truly will be an administration that looks like America, or at least
>>>>>>>>> that slice of America that got double 800s on their SATs. Even more than
>>>>>>>>> past administrations, this will be a valedictocracy — rule by those who
>>>>>>>>> graduate first in their high school classes. If a foreign enemy attacks the
>>>>>>>>> United States during the Harvard-Yale game any time over the next four
>>>>>>>>> years, we're screwed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Already the culture of the Obama administration is coming into focus. Its
>>>>>>>>> members are twice as smart as the poor reporters who have to cover them,
>>>>>>>>> three times if you include the columnists. They typically served in the
>>>>>>>>> Clinton administration and then, like Cincinnatus, retreated to the comforts
>>>>>>>>> of private life — that is, if Cincinnatus had worked at Goldman Sachs,
>>>>>>>>> Williams & Connolly or the Brookings Institution. So many of them send their
>>>>>>>>> kids to Georgetown Day School, the posh leftish private school in D.C., that
>>>>>>>>> they'll be able to hold White House staff meetings in the carpool line.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And yet as much as I want to resent these overeducated Achievatrons (not to
>>>>>>>>> mention the incursion of a French-style government dominated by highly
>>>>>>>>> trained Enarchs), I find myself tremendously impressed by the Obama
>>>>>>>>> transition.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The fact that they can already leak one big appointee per day is testimony
>>>>>>>>> to an awful lot of expert staff work. Unlike past Democratic
>>>>>>>>> administrations, they are not just handing out jobs to the hacks approved by
>>>>>>>>> the favored interest groups. They're thinking holistically — there's a nice
>>>>>>>>> balance of policy wonks, governors and legislators. They're also thinking
>>>>>>>>> strategically. As Norman Ornstein of the American Enterprise Institute
>>>>>>>>> notes, it was smart to name Tom Daschle both the head of Health and Human
>>>>>>>>> Services and the health czar. Splitting those duties up, as Bill Clinton
>>>>>>>>> did, leads to all sorts of conflicts.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Most of all, they are picking Washington insiders. Or to be more precise,
>>>>>>>>> they are picking the best of the Washington insiders.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Obama seems to have dispensed with the romantic and failed notion that you
>>>>>>>>> need inexperienced "fresh faces" to change things. After all, it was L.B.J.
>>>>>>>>> who passed the Civil Rights Act. Moreover, because he is so young, Obama is
>>>>>>>>> not bringing along an insular coterie of lifelong aides who depend upon him
>>>>>>>>> for their well-being.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As a result, the team he has announced so far is more impressive than any
>>>>>>>>> other in recent memory. One may not agree with them on everything or even
>>>>>>>>> most things, but a few things are indisputably true.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> First, these are open-minded individuals who are persuadable by evidence.
>>>>>>>>> Orszag, who will probably be budget director, is trusted by Republicans and
>>>>>>>>> Democrats for his honest presentation of the facts.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Second, they are admired professionals. Conservative legal experts have a
>>>>>>>>> high regard for the probable attorney general, Eric Holder, despite the
>>>>>>>>> business over the Marc Rich pardon.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Third, they are not excessively partisan. Obama signaled that he means to
>>>>>>>>> live up to his postpartisan rhetoric by letting Joe Lieberman keep his
>>>>>>>>> committee chairmanship.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fourth, they are not ideological. The economic advisers, Furman and
>>>>>>>>> Goolsbee, are moderate and thoughtful Democrats. Hillary Clinton at State is
>>>>>>>>> problematic, mostly because nobody has a role for her husband. But, as she
>>>>>>>>> has demonstrated in the Senate, her foreign-policy views are hardheaded and
>>>>>>>>> pragmatic. (It would be great to see her set of interests complemented by
>>>>>>>>> Samantha Power's set of interests at the U.N.)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Finally, there are many people on this team with practical creativity. Any
>>>>>>>>> think tanker can come up with broad doctrines, but it is rare to find people
>>>>>>>>> who can give the president a list of concrete steps he can do day by day to
>>>>>>>>> advance American interests. Dennis Ross, who advised Obama during the
>>>>>>>>> campaign, is the best I've ever seen at this, but Rahm Emanuel also has this
>>>>>>>>> capacity, as does Craig and legislative liaison Phil Schiliro.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Believe me, I'm trying not to join in the vast, heaving O-phoria now
>>>>>>>>> sweeping the coastal haute bourgeoisie. But the personnel decisions have
>>>>>>>>> been superb. The events of the past two weeks should be reassuring to
>>>>>>>>> anybody who feared that Obama would veer to the left or would suffer
>>>>>>>>> self-inflicted wounds because of his inexperience. He's off to a start that
>>>>>>>>> nearly justifies the hype."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Copyright 2008 New York Times
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't remember writing off Presdent GW Bush early.  In fact there was
>>>>>>>>> great hope he could be the compassionate conservative, but he ran off the
>>>>>>>>> rails in ways we have already discussed. We're in a mess all right, but if
>>>>>>>>> it is possible to use our brains to get out of it, then Obama has surely
>>>>>>>>> recruited the best the most intelligent people in the country to get down to
>>>>>>>>> business.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Remember David Brooks is well known and accepted as a conservative
>>>>>>>>> Republican by all reasonable comentators.  I'm going to withhold judgment
>>>>>>>>> and give Mr Obama his fair chance at tackling the issues, and I encourage
>>>>>>>>> everyone to do the same.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ben C.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> benonvelvetelvis wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>> Save me some room in the storm shelter (we hit water when we dig down
>>>>>>>>>> here).
>>>>>>>>>> I'll bring my share of the plastic sheeting and duct tape!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>>> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
>>>>>>>>>> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of Bill Effros
>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 15:30
>>>>>>>>>> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Politics - Palin - Twain
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Rummy,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We didn't have to wait for Bush to get into the White House to write him
>>>>>>>>>> off.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They both ran as "outsiders" and "agents of change" who were going to
>>>>>>>>>> change Washington "business as usual".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But what do we see?  Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rahm Emanuel, Robert Gates,
>>>>>>>>>> Hillary Clinton, Bill Richardson, Joe Biden--same people, different day.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The Democrats are awarding the "spoils" to the people who elected them:
>>>>>>>>>> Lawyers; Wall Street; Organized Labor; Big Farmers.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, the country is spiraling downward, the Democrats will have to
>>>>>>>>>> go to continuous feed web presses or larger denominations to print the
>>>>>>>>>> money fast enough, the "global warming" opposition will be chucked under
>>>>>>>>>> the bus as the "public works projects" start to gear up.  The rest of
>>>>>>>>>> the world has its own problems -- they're not going to bail us out this
>>>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And what about Afghanistan?  You think Vietnam was tough terrain?  Not
>>>>>>>>>> to mention the fact that Afghanistan is twice the size of all of
>>>>>>>>>> Vietnam.  How many soldiers did we have in South Vietnam when you were
>>>>>>>>>> there?  How many do you think it will take to lose in Afghanistan?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is zero evidence that this guy is a smart man.  This country has
>>>>>>>>>> again made the dumbest person in the room "the decider".  I really
>>>>>>>>>> didn't think people would make that same mistake again, but, here we are!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Professional politicians continue to run this country.  They are running
>>>>>>>>>> it into the ground.  We should let the banks go bankrupt; only
>>>>>>>>>> profitable automobile companies will survive; if people overpaid for
>>>>>>>>>> their homes they should give them up; if people don't have jobs they
>>>>>>>>>> should stop going to the mall; if we think we've got to fight wars all
>>>>>>>>>> over the place, lets draft the soldiers; building dams and roads will
>>>>>>>>>> not make the earth greener; public works projects don't end depressions.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We haven't heard one good idea from this guy.  When push comes to shove,
>>>>>>>>>> he always reneges.   And you think we should wait for 4 years before we
>>>>>>>>>> call him on it?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Not me.  We're heading for tough times, and everybody is to blame.  But
>>>>>>>>>> blaming won't help.  Burning food, bailing out ridiculous union
>>>>>>>>>> contracts, letting people live in homes they can't afford, printing more
>>>>>>>>>> money, paying off debts with worthless paper -- will only make things
>>>>>>>>>> worse.  I'll speak up now.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bill Effros
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2RumRunner at aol.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>>>> Bill,
>>>>>>>>>>> Lighten up. Your blood vessels in your head are about to explode. Obama
>>>>>>>>>>> isn't even in the white house yet and you are writing him off already.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, he
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>>>> certainly has his hands full, cleaning up the mess from the last eight
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>> years,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>>>> but he's a smart man and will get the job done. Cut him a little slack.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>> In
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>>>> four years if he hasn't done a good job, then you can replace him. Until
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>> then,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>>>> lighten up Francis.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Rummy
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In a message dated 12/3/2008 12:17:17 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
>>>>>>>>>>> bill at effros.com writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Too bad  it didn't work...she was unable to get out the Republican vote
>>>>>>>>>>> while  Obama's field offices brought out the Democrats en masse...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's less  than a month later, and the Democrats don't seem to have a
>>>>>>>>>>> clue that  they've got a real problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Did you notice that China has announced  they aren't going to bail us out
>>>>>>>>>>> this time?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Bill Effros
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Brad  Haslett wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>>>> "The report of my death is greatly exaggerated" - Mark  Twain
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So, Sarah came down to Georgia.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Brad
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Chambliss: Palin  'allowed us to peak'
>>>>>>>>>>>> By: Andy Barr
>>>>>>>>>>>> December 3, 2008 11:29 AM  EST
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fresh off his runoff victory Tuesday night, Georgia  Republican Sen.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Saxby Chambliss credited Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin with  firing up his
>>>>>>>>>>>> base.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "I can't overstate the impact she  had down here," Chambliss said
>>>>>>>>>>>> during an interview Wednesday morning  on Fox News.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "When she walks in a room, folks just explode,"  he added. "And they
>>>>>>>>>>>> really did pack the house everywhere we went.  She's a dynamic lady, a
>>>>>>>>>>>> great administrator, and I think she's got a  great future in the
>>>>>>>>>>>> Republican Party."
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Chambliss said  that after watching her campaign on his behalf at
>>>>>>>>>>>> several events  Monday, he does not see her star status diminishing
>>>>>>>>>>>> within the  party.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Republican also thanked John McCain and the other  big name
>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans that came to Georgia, but said Palin made the  biggest
>>>>>>>>>>>> impact.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "We had John McCain and Mike Huckabee  and Gov. Romney and Rudy
>>>>>>>>>>>> Giuliani, but Sarah Palin came in on the last  day, did a fly-around
>>>>>>>>>>>> and, man, she was dynamite," he said. "We packed  the houses everywhere
>>>>>>>>>>>> we went. And it really did allow us to peak and  get our base fired
>>>>>>>>>>>> up."
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But as Chambliss heaped praise  on Palin and other big-ticket
>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans that came to Georgia on his  behalf, he questioned why
>>>>>>>>>>>> President-elect Barack Obama would not use  his star power to aid his
>>>>>>>>>>>> Democratic opponent Jim  Martin.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "I have no idea why he didn't come down," Chambliss  said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "His people were here. His organization was here," he  added. "They
>>>>>>>>>>>> really did a good job in the general election of turning  out people.
>>>>>>>>>>>> And whatever their game plan was this time, if he had been  here, I
>>>>>>>>>>>> have no idea whether it would have worked  better."
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> (c) 2008 Capitol News Company, LLC
>>>>>>>>>>>>  __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> To  subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>>>>>                         
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>>>>  __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>>>>>                         
>>>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> To  subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> **************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and
>>>>>>>>>>> favorite sites in one place.  Try it now.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>> (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000
>>>>>>>>>> 010)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>> __________________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
>
>   

-- 
Herb Parsons



More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list