[Rhodes22-list] Noise - Suck It Up!

[john Belanger]

brad
  i am so happy that at long last i can make a knowledgeable constructive comment. i have a solution for the noise. i know from whence i speak. i live directly up wind of dfw in texas. there is really only one horrendously loud plane.....737. i know its a workhorse and very reliable, but its without doubt, the noisiest aircraft in the world. eliminate it and half your noise complaints go away.period. 

Brad Haslett <flybrad at gmail.com> wrote:
  I love the smell of Jet-A first thing in the morning. Here's a clue folks,
in most cases the airport was there long before you were. I've spent many
days and nights, and nights and days in EWR and PHL airport neighborhoods.
You folks ain't exactly living in country club territory. Without the
airport nearby you in fact would be "in da hood" Eat it! Brad

-------------------------------

Plan to reroute jets may mean more noise

By DAVID B. CARUSO, Associated Press Writer* 47 minutes ago*

For years, jets taking off from Newark Liberty International Airport have
performed an act of mercy as they roar south.

Moments after leaving the ground, the planes bank left, out over an
industrial port district, and away from the residential streets of
Elizabeth, N.J., the working-class city that sits right up against the busy
airport.

Maneuvers like this are a common method of sparing citizens from the
window-rattling noise of jets passing overhead.

But now such practices are being dropped in some places in the Northeast as
part of a federal plan to ease record flight delays. And some neighborhoods
that fear they will be subjected to more noise are fighting back in court.

On Dec. 19, the Federal Aviation Administration began its first overhaul in
decades of the jet routes that crisscross the country's most congested
airspace — a 31,000-square-mile area around New York and Philadelphia.

The corridor has been criticized for years as one of the worst problem spots
in the nation's beleaguered air traffic system. Most the paths were laid out
in the 1960s. Some date from the earliest days of air travel, and airlines
have been complaining for years that they are horribly outdated.

Over the next five years, the FAA will be rolling out new routes it believes
can cut flight delays by as much as 20 percent. Some aviation experts say
improvements are essential; nearly three quarters of all flight delays
nationally are caused by backups in New York and Philadelphia.

But a closer look at the revamped flight routes shows that the changes will
lead to more noise for tens of thousands of people, many of whom are already
subject to the whine of jet engines because of their proximity to airports.

In Elizabeth, N.J., the changes will mean that some planes will fly straight
over the center of the city.

"The FAA plan will do more harm to the city of Elizabeth than any terrorist
incident," said Mayor Chris Bollwage.

"We live next to the airport, so we have to take some noise," he said. But
the FAA plan, he added, stretches fairness. "There are places in town where
you can touch the tires."

At least 12 lawsuits have been filed so far in an attempt to stop the plan.
Congress ordered the Government Accountability Office to examine the FAA's
method for choosing the new routes. Top lawmakers from several states have
demanded changes. Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., threatened to block Senate
confirmation of acting FAA administrator Robert Sturgell if the agency
doesn't halt implementation.

So far, the complaints haven't stopped the FAA. Last month, the agency began
phasing in new traffic patterns at the Newark and Philadelphia airports that
allow departing planes to fan out in several directions as they climb,
rather than stick to a single path.

In theory, the change will allow more takeoffs per hour, but outside
Philadelphia it will also mean more planes over a cluster of suburbs in
Delaware County, just west of the airport.

Since the first of the changes went into effect in Philadelphia on Dec. 19,
the airport said it has been getting three complaints a day about noise,
compared with about one every two days in the previous three months.

FAA officials say the airspace redesign will actually lead to a reduction in
noise for a majority of people, largely because the changes will allow
planes to fly at higher altitudes.

But sound-modeling data released by the agency reveals that the gains and
losses will not be spread evenly. Loud neighborhoods will, on average, be
getting louder, while the biggest improvements will be in places that aren't
that noisy to begin with.

According to the FAA, an additional 30,600 people will find themselves
living in neighborhoods where the average daily aircraft noise level is 60
to 65 decibels — considered the high edge of tolerable for a residential
area.

Noise at that level is far from earsplitting; experts say it is less than
residents might experience if they lived next to a busy road. But it is loud
enough that people have to raise their voices as a plane passes overhead.

The number of people living in areas where the average decibel level is
between 55 and 60 will rise by 79,813.

The big losers will be a few communities near Newark and Philadelphia that
already hear a good deal of airplane traffic because of their proximity to
the airports. There will also be a slight to moderate increase in noise in
parts of Morris and Sussex counties in northern New Jersey.

The big winners are people who live a little farther away, and now hear a
medium amount of noise.

By 2011, the FAA estimates that there will be nearly 728,650 fewer people
living in areas where the daily noise level is between 45 and 55 decibels —
louder than a refrigerator hum, but quieter than two people talking in a
room.

Many of those people are in a corridor running southwest from New Brunswick,
N.J. There will also be noise benefits in pockets of densely populated Essex
County, N.J., which includes Newark, and parts of northeastern Pennsylvania.


The opposition is not just coming from areas likely to see big changes.

Fourteen municipalities in western Connecticut have been trying to get the
plan blocked, largely because it will shift an arrival path for New York's
LaGuardia Airport eastward, creating what the FAA says will be slightly more
noise for some towns in Connecticut.

"It's a quality-of-life issue," said Rudy Marconi, a spokesman for the
Alliance for Sensible Airspace Planning and a selectman in Ridgefield,
Conn., 40 miles northeast of LaGuardia. "Will I get used to it? Probably.
But should I have to get used to it?"
__________________________________________________
Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list


       
---------------------------------
Never miss a thing.   Make Yahoo your homepage.