[Rhodes22-list] Spitzer's Choice: An irreverent selection

Brad Haslett flybrad at gmail.com
Mon Mar 31 09:26:25 EDT 2008


Stan,

We'll have to agree to disagree on the Bush 43 Presidency.  Most historians
say that it takes about 50 years to properly judge the effectiveness of an
administration.  Truman left office with about the same poll ratings as Bush
43.

Now as to the abortion issue - it's strictly a personal one and not a
deciding factor for me in choosing candidates.  Yeah, they have to take a
stand one way or the other but in the end do very little.  Remember, Bush 43
was against it (while his wife supports it) and what has been done in the
last 7 years?  Nothing.  This issue is a personal one and should stay that
way.

BTW, my once-upon-a-time abortion decision called me last night from his
ship - loves the USCG!

Brad

On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:06 AM, stan <stan at rhodes22.com> wrote:

> Sorry if I have offended anyone - it is just that I am such a convinced
> advocate of a woman's right to choose and I thought McCain was not.
>
> Most men would admit that if they were the ones who could be told by the
> government what they must do with that thing inside their body, they would
> take advantage of their constitutional right to bear arms and shoot in
> self
> defense.
>
> ss
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Herb Parsons" <hparsons at parsonsys.com>
> To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 6:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Spitzer's Choice: An irreverent selection
>
>
> >I don't think John has any problem with what a woman does with her
> > insides, until it affects the life of someone else.
> >
> > Much the way others would have a problem with MY body parts, if I used
> > them to endanger the life of another.
> >
> > Your misrepresentation of his stand sucks Stan, and is unbecoming to
> > "intelligent debate". You can do better.
> >
> > stan wrote:
> >>     I feel it is my duty (politically speaking) to join my Rhodies
> >> friends early exit-poll reporting of their secret balloting.
> >>
> >>     I would choose McCain because of his age
> >>         Listening to the younger members of the List proves that age
> >> makes one smarter.
> >>
> >>     I would choose Hillary because she is a woman,
> >>         and try as I might, my high lab TEST. level makes me prefer
> woman
> >> over men.
> >>
> >>     I would choose Obama because he is half white,
> >>         and because I have read a dirty tricks blog that he is half
> >> Jewish.   They did not
> >>         mention whether it is the top or bottom half - it does make a
> >> difference.
> >>
> >>
> >>     But with only 2 choices allowed, I had to rule out John because,
> >> while I love his                                 McCain/Kennedy
> >> immigration bill, I do not appreciate his disrespect of women:
> >>         He has reiterated his vows to stick with the party line:  Keep
> >> government off men's back
> >>         and control over women's inside.  Also, while I feel candidates
> >> have a right to flip/flop,
> >>         his flop on now decreasing taxes during war, breaks with all
> >> prior Republican
> >>         commander in chiefs.  I will give him a second look when he
> gets
> >> as old as me.
> >>
> >>     I'm going with Al for president and Barack as VP because Clinton
> >> ignored my right-on and
> >>         perfectly timed Hail Mary call on 4 and 10 at the start of the
> >> second half and blew her game.
> >>
> >>         For Gore bashers:
> >>             With all those terms as a congressman and
> >>             all those terms as a senator and
> >>             with the maximum 2 terms as vice president
> >>                 a "no experience" bash does not hold water.
> >>
> >>         And with a winning of the popular presidential vote,
> >>             the "un-winner ability" bash does not hold water
> >>
> >> But who listens to the hairy 135 Pound Gorilla in the Rhodes chat Room.
> >>
> >>
> >>  stan/ec
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>


More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list