[Rhodes22-list] Politics - Stan and Brad
Alan Robertson
bigal_61 at msn.com
Mon Mar 31 16:15:55 EDT 2008
Again, what does below have to do with a Rhodes 22??
----- Original Message -----
From: David Bradley<mailto:dwbrad at gmail.com>
To: The Rhodes 22 mail list<mailto:rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Politics - Stan and Brad
And Condoleezza just happened to speak out today... hmm. McCain/Rice
vs. Obama/Richardson.
It's been interesting to see the knives being sharpened waiting for
Barack to get the nomination. In our neighborhood caucus the fact
that Hillary has already been "battle tested" was a convincing factor
for some on the fence.
Dave
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Herb Parsons <hparsons at parsonsys.com<mailto:hparsons at parsonsys.com>> wrote:
> I don't disagree with you, just don't know enough to agree. Personally,
> I hope you're right, because from where I've sat (a disinterested
> non-Democrat who refused to "cross lines" just to vote for the lesser
> challenge), he's looked more electable to me than Billary is. It's
> becoming obvious he's going to win the nomination, so I hope he can't
> win the election.
>
> Saw a blurb today on Drudge that said hinted at a possible McCain/Romney
> ticket. That would suit me just fine, but I'd really prefer to see a
> McCain/Rice ticket myself.
>
>
> Brad Haslett wrote:
> > Herb,
> >
> > "He's toast" because Barry Obama has more "lost" baggage than any airline
> > and it will come to light. Had the MSM done their job instead of getting a
> > "tingling in their leg" listening to him speak, this would already be in the
> > open. The OMessiah ran "silent and deep" like a submariner in the Illinois
> > legislature. The guy made it to the US Senate basically unopposed and with
> > little scrutiny. That is not the case now. Right now it is the Clinton's
> > who are trying to shine a spot light on the guy but they are walking a
> > tightrope so as to not piss off their own base. McCain will take the high
> > road in the general election but there are no shortages of 527's and
> > bloggers who will point out the disturbing associations and history of this
> > guy. I don't have a dog in this hunt, for me it will be a process of
> > choosing the least of weasels, but it is going to be fun seeing the MSM get
> > exposed for their incompetence and infatuation. Obama will need ALL of
> > Chicago to get re-elected as Senator - downstaters won't support him once
> > they come to know him.
> >
> > Brad
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Herb Parsons <hparsons at parsonsys.com<mailto:hparsons at parsonsys.com>>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I don't know that I agree with the statement that "he's toast", but the
> >> whole discussion HAS gotten me thinking about how interesting the US
> >> political process is. How often do we have political candidates that are
> >> seriously considered for the highest office in our country, arguably the
> >> most powerful position in the world, that fade into obscurity
> >> afterwards? Actually, the easier question would be how often do the
> >> losers NOT fade into obscurity? There are the occasional "succeed on the
> >> second try" candidates, but for the most part, if you lose a serious
> >> presidential bid, you can just about shelve your further political
> >> aspirations.
> >>
> >> Face it, we're a fickle group. As much was love the "underdog", we
> >> dislike losers more.
> >>
> >> I think Brad's partially right. If Obama doesn't become President, he
> >> will fade to obscurity. I also feel his fall (if it happens) will be as
> >> fast as his rise.
> >> If Hillary doesn't become President, I believe she'll be Al Gore x 10.
> >> She'll be unelectable (and will probably realize it), but will become an
> >> "activist" (or spoiler, depending on your view) for as long as there are
> >> folks that will continue to listen.
> >>
> >> Brad Haslett wrote:
> >>
> >>> Ed,
> >>>
> >>> Yup! It's a mix of Marxist dogma and victimization profit taking. The
> >>>
> >> good
> >>
> >>> Rev. Wright is moving into a new $1.6 million mansion. So much for
> >>> eschewing "middleclassness". Either liberation theology pays well or
> >>>
> >> he's
> >>
> >>> financing his new diggs the same way Barry and Michelle did theirs. The
> >>> O-man is going to talk tough to the bullies of the world but listens to
> >>>
> >> 20+
> >>
> >>> years of white hating, anti-Semitic, anti-American rants, donates money
> >>>
> >> to
> >>
> >>> the organization, and exposes his kids to this crap - but doesn't say
> >>>
> >> squat
> >>
> >>> to the leader. Yeah, he's one tough SOB. Other than watching this thing
> >>> unfold just for fun it's already getting boring. Obama is toast, he'll
> >>>
> >> be
> >>
> >>> lucky to get re-elected to the Senate. Move along folks nothing to see
> >>> here!
> >>>
> >>> Brad
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Tootle <ekroposki at charter.net<mailto:ekroposki at charter.net>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org<mailto:Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list<http://www.rhodes22.org/list>
> >>
> >>
> > __________________________________________________
> > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org<mailto:Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list<http://www.rhodes22.org/list>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org<mailto:Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list<http://www.rhodes22.org/list>
>
--
David Bradley
+1.206.234.3977
dwbrad at gmail.com<mailto:dwbrad at gmail.com>
__________________________________________________
Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org<mailto:Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list<http://www.rhodes22.org/list>
More information about the Rhodes22-list
mailing list