[Rhodes22-list] Spitzer's Choice: An irreverent selection

Herb Parsons hparsons at parsonsys.com
Mon Mar 31 23:20:09 EDT 2008


You're missing the point Stan (thought I think deliberately). No one 
argues the woman's right to "use her insides". She's free to screw 
whoever she wants (as long as he/she is willing and of an age of 
consent). The woman is free to choose whether or not to also use 
something on her insides that can prevent a pregnancy.

However, when she has made those decisions, and the creation of another 
human life is the result of her making those decisions; then yes, there 
are many among us that say her "right" to choose to kill that life 
should be restricted.

I'm among them. However, if you, or anyone else, tries to say that I'm 
"against a woman choosing to do what she wants with her insides" I'll 
stridently say, and yes even RANT, that it's a gross misrepresentation 
of my view.

Again, one's rights to their body SHOULD end where another human's 
rights begin.

stan wrote:
> Sorry if I have offended anyone - it is just that I am such a convinced 
> advocate of a woman's right to choose and I thought McCain was not.
>
> Most men would admit that if they were the ones who could be told by the 
> government what they must do with that thing inside their body, they would 
> take advantage of their constitutional right to bear arms and shoot in self 
> defense.
>
> ss
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Herb Parsons" <hparsons at parsonsys.com>
> To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 6:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Spitzer's Choice: An irreverent selection
>
>
>   
>> I don't think John has any problem with what a woman does with her
>> insides, until it affects the life of someone else.
>>
>> Much the way others would have a problem with MY body parts, if I used
>> them to endanger the life of another.
>>
>> Your misrepresentation of his stand sucks Stan, and is unbecoming to
>> "intelligent debate". You can do better.
>>
>> stan wrote:
>>     
>>>     I feel it is my duty (politically speaking) to join my Rhodies 
>>> friends early exit-poll reporting of their secret balloting.
>>>
>>>     I would choose McCain because of his age
>>>         Listening to the younger members of the List proves that age 
>>> makes one smarter.
>>>
>>>     I would choose Hillary because she is a woman,
>>>         and try as I might, my high lab TEST. level makes me prefer woman 
>>> over men.
>>>
>>>     I would choose Obama because he is half white,
>>>         and because I have read a dirty tricks blog that he is half 
>>> Jewish.   They did not
>>>         mention whether it is the top or bottom half - it does make a 
>>> difference.
>>>
>>>
>>>     But with only 2 choices allowed, I had to rule out John because, 
>>> while I love his                                 McCain/Kennedy 
>>> immigration bill, I do not appreciate his disrespect of women:
>>>         He has reiterated his vows to stick with the party line:  Keep 
>>> government off men's back
>>>         and control over women's inside.  Also, while I feel candidates 
>>> have a right to flip/flop,
>>>         his flop on now decreasing taxes during war, breaks with all 
>>> prior Republican
>>>         commander in chiefs.  I will give him a second look when he gets 
>>> as old as me.
>>>
>>>     I'm going with Al for president and Barack as VP because Clinton 
>>> ignored my right-on and
>>>         perfectly timed Hail Mary call on 4 and 10 at the start of the 
>>> second half and blew her game.
>>>
>>>         For Gore bashers:
>>>             With all those terms as a congressman and
>>>             all those terms as a senator and
>>>             with the maximum 2 terms as vice president
>>>                 a "no experience" bash does not hold water.
>>>
>>>         And with a winning of the popular presidential vote,
>>>             the "un-winner ability" bash does not hold water
>>>
>>> But who listens to the hairy 135 Pound Gorilla in the Rhodes chat Room.
>>>
>>>
>>>  stan/ec
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> __________________________________________________
>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list 
>>     
>
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>
>
>
>   


More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list