[Rhodes22-list] Correction Alert
Herb Parsons
hparsons at parsonsys.com
Mon Mar 31 23:35:56 EDT 2008
It's an old Democrat trick. You repeat the same story enough, and it
becomes "true".
At least, in some circles....
Michael D. Weisner wrote:
> Brad,
>
> You are not alone...
>
> I thought that he was attempting to drive home a point through repetition.
>
> Mike
> s/v Shanghai'd Summer ('81)
> Nissequogue River, NY
>
> From: "Brad Haslett" <flybrad at gmail.com>Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 2:01 PM
>
>> Pete,
>>
>> Is it just me or is everyone getting multiple posts? Why don't you solve
>> your e-mail and internet issues before you save the world. On the other
>> hand, develop your "widespread" ammunition and share it with the troops.
>>
>> Brad
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:46 PM, petelargo <petelauritzen at earthlink.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Al Gore was just on 60 minutes last nite. He lost the weight. Also, it
>>> took
>>> him a while because of the size of the house and his schedule, but he
>>> finished making his mansion energy independent and is now working on his
>>> parents place. He made a ton of money investing in Google early on. He
>>> donated every penny of his book and movie and Nobel Peace Prize award to
>>> upcoming ads and movement to ally political opposites and mobilize
>>> international trainings to the climate change awareness issue.
>>>
>>> I won't even get into the 2000 vote "scamola" as there is plenty of data
>>> on
>>> that, but no one questions that he won the popular vote. He certainly
>>> was
>>> within his rights to sue but opted out. Classy guy. Good pick, Stan.
>>>
>>> More info:
>>>
>>> The Florida recount was stopped a few weeks later by the Supreme Court of
>>> the United States. In the ruling, Bush v. Gore, the Florida recount was
>>> called unconstitutional and that no constitutionally valid recount could
>>> be
>>> completed by the December 12 deadline, effectively ending the recounts.
>>> This
>>> 7-2 vote ruled that the standards the Florida Supreme Court provided for
>>> a
>>> recount as unconstitutional due to violations of the Equal Protection
>>> Clause
>>> of the Fourteenth Amendment, and further ruled 5-4 that no
>>> constitutionally
>>> valid recount could be completed by the December 12 deadline. This case
>>> ordered an end to recounting underway in selected Florida counties,
>>> effectively giving George W. Bush a 534 vote victory in Florida and
>>> consequently Florida's 27 electoral votes and the presidency.[44] The
>>> results of the decision led to Gore winning the popular vote by
>>> approximately 500,000 votes nationwide, but receiving 266 electoral votes
>>> to
>>> Bush's 271 (1 DC Elector abstained).[45] Gore strongly disagreed with the
>>> Court's decision, but decided "for the sake of our unity as a people and
>>> the
>>> strength of our democracy, I offer my concession."[46]
>>>
>>> The election was one of the most controversial in recent American
>>> history.[1][2]
>>>
>>>
>>> Brad Haslett-2 wrote:
>>>
>>>> Stan,
>>>>
>>>> Count yourself lucky, at least you know what you want! McCain is half
>>>> RINO,
>>>> half DINO. Hillary is a Clinton. Obama is half everything. If in
>>>>
>>> fact,
>>>
>>>> if
>>>> he's got Jewish blood as well, he doesn't have to apologize for his
>>>> Pastor.
>>>> That church will throw him out in a heartbeat.
>>>>
>>>> Gore wouldn't be so bad. Maybe if he was the President he'd sell his
>>>> gazillion square-foot, global warming house. They have a track at the
>>>> White
>>>> House don't they? Big Al could use some exercise. If he does run I'd
>>>> like
>>>> to remind him of two things. One, win your own state. Two, the
>>>> Supreme
>>>> Court didn't pick the winner in 2000, they just set a deadline to stop
>>>> re-counting the votes in Florida. He lost by all five methods
>>>> including
>>>> the
>>>> two he cherry-picked.
>>>>
>>>> Brad
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 1:55 PM, stan <stan at rhodes22.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I feel it is my duty (politically speaking) to join my Rhodies
>>>>>
>>> friends
>>>
>>>>> early exit-poll reporting of their secret balloting.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would choose McCain because of his age
>>>>> Listening to the younger members of the List proves that age
>>>>>
>>> makes
>>>
>>>>> one smarter.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would choose Hillary because she is a woman,
>>>>> and try as I might, my high lab TEST. level makes me prefer
>>>>>
>>> woman
>>>
>>>>> over men.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would choose Obama because he is half white,
>>>>> and because I have read a dirty tricks blog that he is half
>>>>> Jewish.
>>>>> They did not
>>>>> mention whether it is the top or bottom half - it does make a
>>>>> difference.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But with only 2 choices allowed, I had to rule out John because,
>>>>>
>>> while
>>>
>>>>> I love his McCain/Kennedy immigration
>>>>> bill,
>>>>> I do not appreciate his disrespect of women:
>>>>> He has reiterated his vows to stick with the party line: Keep
>>>>> government off men's back
>>>>> and control over women's inside. Also, while I feel candidates
>>>>> have a right to flip/flop,
>>>>> his flop on now decreasing taxes during war, breaks with all
>>>>>
>>> prior
>>>
>>>>> Republican
>>>>> commander in chiefs. I will give him a second look when he
>>>>> gets
>>>>> as
>>>>> old as me.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm going with Al for president and Barack as VP because Clinton
>>>>> ignored my right-on and
>>>>> perfectly timed Hail Mary call on 4 and 10 at the start of the
>>>>> second half and blew her game.
>>>>>
>>>>> For Gore bashers:
>>>>> With all those terms as a congressman and
>>>>> all those terms as a senator and
>>>>> with the maximum 2 terms as vice president
>>>>> a "no experience" bash does not hold water.
>>>>>
>>>>> And with a winning of the popular presidential vote,
>>>>> the "un-winner ability" bash does not hold water
>>>>>
>>>>> But who listens to the hairy 135 Pound Gorilla in the Rhodes chat
>>>>> Room.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> stan/ec
>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://www.nabble.com/Spitzer%27s-Choice%3A-An-irreverent-selection-tp16385753p16396090.html
>>> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>
>>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>
>
>
>
More information about the Rhodes22-list
mailing list