[Rhodes22-list] Correction Alert
Herb Parsons
hparsons at parsonsys.com
Mon Mar 31 23:40:35 EDT 2008
Do they REALLY "infer" that? I could see "imply", but "infer"??? How so?
Michael D. Weisner wrote:
> Elle,
>
> Are you havin' a sh!*ty day, too? Your constant references seem to infer
> such. I know, I can't wait to go sailing, either. We are talking about a
> short sail on Sunday, weather permitting. The afternoon highs are predicted
> to reach the low 60s!! Now if the sun would just show up! Tomorrow is
> supposed to be beautiful - maybe I'll need to call in sick ...
>
> Mike
> s/v Shanghai'd Summer ('81)
> Nissequogue River, NY
>
>
> From: "elle" <watermusic38 at yahoo.com>Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 3:29 PM
>
>> Yesterday the list was constipated...now it has the
>> oposite problem...
>>
>> or maybe Ed did explode....
>>
>> ;^)
>>
>>
>> elle
>> --- "Michael D. Weisner" <mweisner at ebsmed.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Brad,
>>>
>>> You are not alone...
>>>
>>> I thought that he was attempting to drive home a
>>> point through repetition.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>> s/v Shanghai'd Summer ('81)
>>> Nissequogue River, NY
>>>
>>> From: "Brad Haslett" <flybrad at gmail.com>Sent:
>>> Monday, March 31, 2008 2:01 PM
>>>
>>>> Pete,
>>>>
>>>> Is it just me or is everyone getting multiple
>>>>
>>> posts? Why don't you solve
>>>
>>>> your e-mail and internet issues before you save
>>>>
>>> the world. On the other
>>>
>>>> hand, develop your "widespread" ammunition and
>>>>
>>> share it with the troops.
>>>
>>>> Brad
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:46 PM, petelargo
>>>>
>>> <petelauritzen at earthlink.net>
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Al Gore was just on 60 minutes last nite. He
>>>>>
>>> lost the weight. Also, it
>>>
>>>>> took
>>>>> him a while because of the size of the house and
>>>>>
>>> his schedule, but he
>>>
>>>>> finished making his mansion energy independent
>>>>>
>>> and is now working on his
>>>
>>>>> parents place. He made a ton of money investing
>>>>>
>>> in Google early on. He
>>>
>>>>> donated every penny of his book and movie and
>>>>>
>>> Nobel Peace Prize award to
>>>
>>>>> upcoming ads and movement to ally political
>>>>>
>>> opposites and mobilize
>>>
>>>>> international trainings to the climate change
>>>>>
>>> awareness issue.
>>>
>>>>> I won't even get into the 2000 vote "scamola" as
>>>>>
>>> there is plenty of data
>>>
>>>>> on
>>>>> that, but no one questions that he won the
>>>>>
>>> popular vote. He certainly
>>>
>>>>> was
>>>>> within his rights to sue but opted out. Classy
>>>>>
>>> guy. Good pick, Stan.
>>>
>>>>> More info:
>>>>>
>>>>> The Florida recount was stopped a few weeks later
>>>>>
>>> by the Supreme Court of
>>>
>>>>> the United States. In the ruling, Bush v. Gore,
>>>>>
>>> the Florida recount was
>>>
>>>>> called unconstitutional and that no
>>>>>
>>> constitutionally valid recount could
>>>
>>>>> be
>>>>> completed by the December 12 deadline,
>>>>>
>>> effectively ending the recounts.
>>>
>>>>> This
>>>>> 7-2 vote ruled that the standards the Florida
>>>>>
>>> Supreme Court provided for
>>>
>>>>> a
>>>>> recount as unconstitutional due to violations of
>>>>>
>>> the Equal Protection
>>>
>>>>> Clause
>>>>> of the Fourteenth Amendment, and further ruled
>>>>>
>>> 5-4 that no
>>>
>>>>> constitutionally
>>>>> valid recount could be completed by the December
>>>>>
>>> 12 deadline. This case
>>>
>>>>> ordered an end to recounting underway in selected
>>>>>
>>> Florida counties,
>>>
>>>>> effectively giving George W. Bush a 534 vote
>>>>>
>>> victory in Florida and
>>>
>>>>> consequently Florida's 27 electoral votes and the
>>>>>
>>> presidency.[44] The
>>>
>>>>> results of the decision led to Gore winning the
>>>>>
>>> popular vote by
>>>
>>>>> approximately 500,000 votes nationwide, but
>>>>>
>>> receiving 266 electoral votes
>>>
>>>>> to
>>>>> Bush's 271 (1 DC Elector abstained).[45] Gore
>>>>>
>>> strongly disagreed with the
>>>
>>>>> Court's decision, but decided "for the sake of
>>>>>
>>> our unity as a people and
>>>
>>>>> the
>>>>> strength of our democracy, I offer my
>>>>>
>>> concession."[46]
>>>
>>>>> The election was one of the most controversial in
>>>>>
>>> recent American
>>>
>>>>> history.[1][2]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Brad Haslett-2 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Stan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Count yourself lucky, at least you know what
>>>>>>
>>> you want! McCain is half
>>>
>>>>>> RINO,
>>>>>> half DINO. Hillary is a Clinton. Obama is
>>>>>>
>>> half everything. If in
>>>
>>>>> fact,
>>>>>
>>>>>> if
>>>>>> he's got Jewish blood as well, he doesn't have
>>>>>>
>>> to apologize for his
>>>
>>>>>> Pastor.
>>>>>> That church will throw him out in a heartbeat.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gore wouldn't be so bad. Maybe if he was the
>>>>>>
>>> President he'd sell his
>>>
>>>>>> gazillion square-foot, global warming house.
>>>>>>
>>> They have a track at the
>>>
>>>>>> White
>>>>>> House don't they? Big Al could use some
>>>>>>
>>> exercise. If he does run I'd
>>>
>>>>>> like
>>>>>> to remind him of two things. One, win your own
>>>>>>
>>> state. Two, the
>>>
>>>>>> Supreme
>>>>>> Court didn't pick the winner in 2000, they just
>>>>>>
>>> set a deadline to stop
>>>
>>>>>> re-counting the votes in Florida. He lost by
>>>>>>
>>> all five methods
>>>
>>>>>> including
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> two he cherry-picked.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Brad
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 1:55 PM, stan
>>>>>>
>>> <stan at rhodes22.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> I feel it is my duty (politically speaking)
>>>>>>>
>>> to join my Rhodies
>>>
>>>>> friends
>>>>>
>>>>>>> early exit-poll reporting of their secret
>>>>>>>
>>> balloting.
>>>
>>>>>>> I would choose McCain because of his age
>>>>>>> Listening to the younger members of the
>>>>>>>
>>> List proves that age
>>>
>>>>> makes
>>>>>
>>>>>>> one smarter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would choose Hillary because she is a
>>>>>>>
>>> woman,
>>>
>>>>>>> and try as I might, my high lab TEST.
>>>>>>>
>>> level makes me prefer
>>>
>>>>> woman
>>>>>
>>>>>>> over men.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would choose Obama because he is half
>>>>>>>
>>> white,
>>>
>>>>>>> and because I have read a dirty tricks
>>>>>>>
>>> blog that he is half
>>>
>>>>>>> Jewish.
>>>>>>> They did not
>>>>>>> mention whether it is the top or bottom
>>>>>>>
>>> half - it does make a
>>>
>>>>>>> difference.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But with only 2 choices allowed, I had to
>>>>>>>
>>> rule out John because,
>>>
>>>>> while
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I love his
>>>>>>>
>>> McCain/Kennedy immigration
>>>
>>>>>>> bill,
>>>>>>> I do not appreciate his disrespect of women:
>>>>>>> He has reiterated his vows to stick
>>>>>>>
>>> with the party line: Keep
>>>
>>>>>>> government off men's back
>>>>>>> and control over women's inside. Also,
>>>>>>>
>>> while I feel candidates
>>>
>>>>>>> have a right to flip/flop,
>>>>>>> his flop on now decreasing taxes during
>>>>>>>
>>> war, breaks with all
>>>
>>>>> prior
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Republican
>>>>>>> commander in chiefs. I will give him a
>>>>>>>
>>> second look when he
>>>
>>>>>>> gets
>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>> old as me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm going with Al for president and Barack
>>>>>>>
>>> as VP because Clinton
>>>
>>>>>>> ignored my right-on and
>>>>>>> perfectly timed Hail Mary call on 4 and
>>>>>>>
>>> 10 at the start of the
>>>
>>>>>>> second half and blew her game.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For Gore bashers:
>>>>>>> With all those terms as a
>>>>>>>
>>> congressman and
>>>
>>>>>>> all those terms as a senator and
>>>>>>> with the maximum 2 terms as vice
>>>>>>>
>>> president
>>>
>>>>>>> a "no experience" bash does not
>>>>>>>
>>> hold water.
>>>
>>>>>>> And with a winning of the popular
>>>>>>>
>>> presidential vote,
>>>
>>>>>>> the "un-winner ability" bash does
>>>>>>>
>>> not hold water
>>>
>>>>>>> But who listens to the hairy 135 Pound Gorilla
>>>>>>>
>>> in the Rhodes chat
>>>
>>>>>>> Room.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> stan/ec
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>>
>>>>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
>>>>>>>
>>> www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>>
>>>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
>>>>>>
>>> www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Spitzer%27s-Choice%3A-An-irreverent-selection-tp16385753p16396090.html
>>
>>>>> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at
>>>>>
>>> Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>>
>>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
>>>>>
>>> www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
>>>>
>>> www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>
>>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
>>> www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>
>>>
>> We can't change the angle of the wind....but we can adjust our sails.
>>
>> 1992 Rhodes 22 Recyc '06 "WaterMusic" (Lady in Red)
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________________________________
>> OMG, Sweet deal for Yahoo! users/friends:Get A Month of Blockbuster Total
>> Access, No Cost. W00t
>> http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text2.com
>> __________________________________________________
>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>
>
>
>
More information about the Rhodes22-list
mailing list