[Rhodes22-list] for Brad's eyes and those who reason only ...

[John Shulick]

hparsons wrote:
> 
> "Thanks John, there are lots of us around."
> 
> That's why this country is in such trouble
> 
> "Then there are folks who want to deride people because of their beliefs, 
> political views etc. You took a polite discussion about eminent domain 
> and turned it an accusation against Brad and I about "final solutions"."
> 
> Oh please listen to the pot calling the kettle black. If you don't want
> comment about your conversations then don't post them in a public forum
> such as this. Use the back channel or private e-mails to amuse yourselves
> with your conservative nonsense, please leave the rest of us out of it. 
> 
> "Maybe you and Slim SHOULD get together. You seem to have many 
> similarities, and he's looking for someone to do weird stuff to his ass."
> 
> I would consider performing with Steven if he were so inclined and the
> time presented itself. the only ass I'm concerned with is the one I'm
> responding to right now.
> 
> 
> John Shulick wrote:
>> Steven,
>>
>> As a fellow alum from Duquesne Univ. I thank you for your support. Over
>> the
>> last 30 or so years I was a church soloist and section leader for just
>> about
>> every major faith and I've seen many Herbs and some spices as well.(sorry
>> couldn't resist) 
>>
>> John Shulick
>>
>>
>>
>> Steven Alm wrote:
>>   
>>> Herb,
>>>
>>> Do you have any idea how much you sound like you're talking out your
>>> ass?
>>> Do you really want to put up your 1099 to show off what you've donated
>>> to
>>> charity?   You're such a bore.  I'm going to guess that maybe you tithe
>>> a
>>> full 10% to your fundamentalist church because they tell you to--out of
>>> false compassion.  And the money goes to your church--not anything real. 
>>> Or
>>> at best a small percentage.  I know you donate your time riding your
>>> motorcycle around for stuff but is that actually giving?  You're a
>>> cheerleader.  Great.
>>>
>>> As for the Native Americans you don't seem to have a grasp on history. 
>>> Just
>>> because the Injuns didn't have a concept of land ownership or fences
>>> doesn't
>>> mean the white man didn't take it away from them.  You're an idiot.  The
>>> Indians were living in the stone-age and were decimated by the white man
>>> out
>>> of greed and arrogance.  There was no need for that.  To say that they
>>> simply met a stronger enemy completely usurps all that compassion and
>>> charity that you espouse.  You're full of shit!  I was born on the
>>> Sissiton
>>> reservation in South Dakota and you can kiss my ass!
>>>
>>> Slim
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:36 PM, John Shulick <jsbudda at verizon.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     
>>>> "John,"
>>>> (at least you are capable of starting a post properly by addressing me
>>>> by
>>>> name. I assumed you were ignorant at first but now I see you're simply
>>>> rude.
>>>>
>>>> "Go screw yourself."
>>>> (Sorry to old to bend that way anymore perhaps you could send a pic of
>>>> how
>>>> you accomplish it yourself.)
>>>>
>>>> "I've never offered anything like a ""final solution"".
>>>> You're reference reveals you for what you are."
>>>>
>>>> (you have no clue as to who or what I am)
>>>>
>>>> As far as me "detesting" anyone, you again speak from total ignorance.
>>>> I'll make a deal with you though, I'll make my tax returns for the last
>>>> 10 years public on here to show how much I've given to charity if
>>>> you'll
>>>> do the same.
>>>>
>>>> (Do you recall the parable of the pharisee and the old woman who went
>>>> to
>>>> the
>>>> temple to make sacrifice?)
>>>>
>>>> You ready to put up? I doubt it. I suspect the size of your mouth is
>>>> exceeded mainly by your ego, and your actions are far lacking compared
>>>> to either.
>>>>
>>>> (In the mouth and ego department its no contest you win)
>>>>
>>>> If the government determines a need for social charity programs, they
>>>> should do so by purchasing land they need. Simple. If it's too
>>>> expensive, buy elsewhere.
>>>>
>>>> (that's what is happening in this instance so what's your problem)
>>>>
>>>> As to your notion about "stealing it from the original owners", which
>>>> land are you talking about? You'll have to be a little more specific.
>>>> Some of the Indian tribes didn't ascribe to the notion of "owning
>>>> land".
>>>> Others regularly took land from each other by armed conflict. So, the
>>>> "theft" was actually their normally accepted means of transfer, they
>>>> simply were defeated by a stronger enemy.
>>>>
>>>> (like white men with guns and smallpox infested blankets? do the words
>>>> "trail of tears" mean anything to you?)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>> http://www.nabble.com/for-Brad%27s-eyes-and-those-who-reason-only-...-tp20405744p20414236.html
>>>> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>       
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>> __________________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>     
>>
>>   
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/for-Brad%27s-eyes-and-those-who-reason-only-...-tp20405744p20422255.html
Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.