[Rhodes22-list] Political response to Bill E about ... Friday rant...

Andrew Collins sailingvesselcarmen at gmail.com
Sat Nov 22 22:02:24 EST 2008


Ed

Since you are off on a tangent: AmEx just cancelled my business line of
credit program, i.e. not my account, but all accounts that had this type of
credit line. Sooo, now I find that if I cannot get another institution to
give my firm a line of credit, there may have to be layoffs if the AR falls
off. This is the reality of this capitalist.

If the above comes to pass, then there will be no health insurance for the
ones who lose their jobs, nor for their children. Oh yes, and AMEX is a bank
now, according to the NYT.

Oh, and since my clients can't get loans, they are not building, and don't
need to hire engineers. This is going to be quite a holiday season, thanks
to the absence of leadership in the in the halls of Washington.

Dosvedanya, tovarich Kroposhki.

Andrew

PS The only project I have line on is a renovaton of an office suite to
become the Polish Mission to the UN, could you put in a word?


On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Tootle <ekroposki at charter.net> wrote:

>
> Bill,
>
> Thank you for your response about the birth certificate issue.  It is much
> more responsive than the socialist brush off submitted by others.
>
> Brad said, "Obama has acted very aloof and arrogant about the basic right
> of
> asking if he's legal to hold the highest office in the land. The question
> at
> hand is quite simple and one any citizen has the right to ask, "are you
> constitutionally legal to hold the office of POTUS"?  He could have and
> should have ended this himself months ago."
>
> This is the issue and as Brad points out, it could have been resolved.
>  Even
> if he has seen the long form and it proves his case, why is he dragging it
> out?  Just for political gain to diminish his future critiques?  I am sorry
> that is not leadership.
>
> Have you bothered to read the recent post Kathleen Parker with her rant
> against religion?  I surmise that she is a devote Marxist, because she is
> trying to supplement her opinion for long standing human religions.  I used
> to have a business associate who was a very devout Hindu.  I simply
> accepted
> him and his religion and went on.  There are many religions out there;
> there
> is no need for compulsion to do away with religions.  That is the
> dictatorship which is the heart of Marxism.
>
> And now to Senator Chris Dodd's comment about being frustrated by banks not
> doing what he wants.  He further stated his intent to introduce legislation
> to compel banks do lend.
>
> Isn't his prior compelling banks to make bad loans a integral part of what
> caused the current financial mess?  Banks were directed to make marginal
> loans.  Banks packaged the marginal loans so as to be able to foist them
> off
> as securities with value.
>
> This is not free market economy but manipulated market economy.  Who made
> Chris Dodd's the god of banking?  He and his fellow travelers are a big
> part
> of the economic mess.  I cannot see where his judgment is good.  I am sorry
> but compulsion of choice has been shown to be no choice and results in
> crisis.
>
> Herb said, "Something that looks like it'll work, sounds like it'll work,
> is
> "pleasing" to the masses because of it's price appeal, but doesn't quite do
> and falls apart when put to the test."  And Robert and Andrew and Stan and
> others want our health care to work like the above?  Get real.
>
> Ed K
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Political-response-to-Bill-E-about-...-Friday-rant...-tp20620422p20620422.html
> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>


More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list