[Rhodes22-list] Ben C at it again...

[Tootle]

Ben C is again citing the New York Times as authority.  And it is its biased
editorial staff no less.  I am sorry to disagree with Ben because I advocate
ethical conduct of politicians.  However, I have to believe that citing the
New York Times as a good source of information is egregious hypocrisy.  The
New York Times supported the Dan Rather lies. It is not an honest
information souce.

An Attorney General or assistant attorney general is a political position. 
An attorney general has a right to dismiss assistant attorney generals for
any reason.  Ben fails to cite the enabling legislation saying that a
politically appointed assistant attorney general can only be fired for
cause.  Ben has  access to the laws, he needs to post the law that says
assistant attorneys general can only be fired for specific causes?  Ben is
confusing career civil service with politically appointed jobs.  And, it is
obvious this is intentional deception.  

The Attorney General does not have to personally fire the assistants.  He
can use an intermediate assistant to do so. Again, show us the specific law
that says he cannot delegate an assistant to fire a subordinate assistant.

How about wrong doing by Obama, or his shady acceptance of contributions? 
Just look at the sources of his internet contributions.  Has he denied or
vigorously stopped them.  

Again, there is a ethical problem of supporting intentional deception.  This
is not mere puffing and discusssion.

Ed K
Greenville, SC, USA


-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Ben-C-at-it-again...-tp19777306p19777306.html
Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.