[Rhodes22-list] USAttorneygate; the chickens come home to roost
Benjamin Cittadino
bigben65 at earthlink.net
Thu Oct 2 15:12:41 EDT 2008
Bill;
If Fitzgerald is talking about an ongoing investigation of Obama I sure
haven't heard about it. Federal proaecutors are not supposed to talk about
such pending investigations and there are serious ethical considerations at
stake if they do so. I think your sources ate speculating about what
Fitzgerald is doing. As for beneficiaries of ill gotten gains being guilty
of anything they have to know the they are benefiting from illegal money.
Lots of politicians have returned money later shown to have been from
improper sources.
I have a lot of respect for Fitzgerald and find it hard to believe he would
jeopardize both successful prosecution of a matter or his career by speaking
out of school. I will check it out though.
Best,
Ben C.
Bill Effros wrote:
>
> Ben,
>
> Can you tell me where I can find Obama stating that Patrick Fitzgerald
> will not be asked to resign?
>
> Mr. Rezko complained to his trial judge that Mr. Fitzgerald was
> pressuring him to implicate Mr. Obama. The judge released the letter
> after the trial. Mr. Obama is also named as a recipient of money
> extorted on his behalf by Mr. Rezko in the indictment of Mr. Rezko. In
> a proffer Mr. Fitzgerald stated that anyone who benefits from Mr.
> Rezko's crimes was as guilty as the person who was convicted, and this
> has been the theme of the prosecution, going from one defendant to the
> next.
>
> People who says Mr. Fitzgerald is not investigating Mr. Obama don't know
> what they are talking about--Mr. Fitzgerald has been quite plain about
> the fact that he IS investigating Mr. Obama. The FBI has released both
> photographs and tapes implicating Obama in the Rezko "schemes". Mr.
> Fitzgerald sought and obtained permission to involve Mr. Obama in the
> Rezko trial, but didn't need to do so because Mr. Rezko chose not to
> defend himself on these matters.
>
> Several other witness who have pled guilty and been convicted of these
> crimes have stated that Mr. Obama is involved, and that they are
> prepared to testify against him. Obama's name came out on numerous
> occasions during the trial, and most of the guilty parties had direct
> illegal dealings with Mr. Obama, and are prepared to so testify.
>
> Most of this information has been reported in Main Stream Media, and the
> rest is available on Mr. Fitzgerald's Web Site. Follow the links to
> "Operation Board Games".
>
> Mr. Rezko appealed to Karl Rove to have Mr. Fitzpatrick fired. Rezko
> was so sure he would succeed, he told other witnesses to lie to the FBI
> to cover his and Mr. Obama's involvement.
>
> Talk about chickens coming home to roost!
>
> Bill Effros
>
>
>> Bill & Rob & Ed;
>>
>> Sen Obama has already said several times, in response to questions from
>> various reporters that Patrick Fitzgerald's job is safe. I must say here
>> that I has been my understanding that the targets of Mr Fitzgeralds
>> inquiries have been Mr Rezko, and people other than Obama himself. He's
>> very
>> discreet, any anybody who says they are sure he's looking at Obama (or
>> not)
>> doesn't know what they're talking about.
>>
>> Bill's concern is well founded though. I was in law school when Nixon
>> fired
>> AG Richardson, then Dep AG Ruckelshaus for not firing Special Prosecutor
>> Cox
>> (Robert Bork ultimately did it). In response Nixon gave the famous "I am
>> not a crook" speech, and the move to impeachment became unstoppable.
>>
>> As to Ed's point, I've said it as many different ways as I know how. If
>> Monica Goodling made hiring decisions at DOJ for non-political jobs based
>> upon political affiliation or perceived political loyalty she broke the
>> law.
>> THAT'S WHY SHE RESIGNED IN DISGRACE. Remember?
>>
>> And if the 9 US Attorney's were fired FOR ILLEGAL REASONS like not
>> bringing
>> trumped up charges against politcal opponents of a particular US Senator,
>> then that's illegal and that's why AG Mukasey had no choice but to
>> appoint a
>> special prosecutor. He's done it, because not to do it would be an
>> obvious
>> malfeasence; but he has given the Special Prosecutor an impossible 60 day
>> deadline to produce a report. He's done the right thing with one hand
>> but
>> ensured failure with the other hand. That's why we need a clean sweep, a
>> new AG, and Truth, Justice and the American Way for all. Thank
>> you....thank
>> you very much ladies and gentlemen.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Ben C.
>>
>> Bill Effros wrote:
>>
>>> Rob,
>>>
>>> US Attorneys serve the President. They can replace them if they choose
>>> to do so. But that was not the issue in this thread.
>>>
>>> The issue here is "Chickens come home to roost" regarding the
>>> replacement of US Attorneys.
>>>
>>> So I ask again,
>>>
>>> Is it OK for Obama to request the resignation of a well respected US
>>> Attorney who is currently investigating Obama?
>>>
>>> What are the perceived rules in this instance?
>>>
>>> Bill Effros
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Lowe, Rob wrote:
>>>
>>>> Isn't it "traditional" (OK, not the right word) for all the US
>>>> attorneys
>>>> to submit their resignations at the beginning of a president's new
>>>> term?
>>>> Or is it just a new president taking office? Regardless, why wouldn't
>>>> Fitzgerald submit his resignation along with the rest of the US
>>>> attorneys?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
>>>> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of Bill Effros
>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 9:15 AM
>>>> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List
>>>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] USAttorneygate; the chickens come home to
>>>> roost
>>>>
>>>> Ben,
>>>>
>>>> How do you think Obama will handle Federal Prosecutor Patrick
>>>> Fitzgerald
>>>>
>>>> (also on the Bush "to be fired" list -- special prosecutor in the
>>>> Valerie Plame CIA leak case) who is currently investigating Barack
>>>> Obama?
>>>>
>>>> Do you think it is is OK for Obama to fire Fitzgerald?
>>>>
>>>> Bill Effros
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Benjamin Cittadino wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Brad & Anybody still paying attention;
>>>>>
>>>>> The link to a NYTimes editorial explains in precise detail how the
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> firings
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> by the Bush administration of a number of federal prosecutors is a
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> serious
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> matter that cried out for the appointment of a special prosecutor.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Note the
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> desciption of the firings being unrelated to and not he result of any
>>>>> performance reviews. This issue goes to the very heart of federal law
>>>>> enforcement, and, in my opinion, compels a change to an Obama
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> administration
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> which will ensure the inquiry survives after January.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/01/opinion/01wed1.html?hp
>>>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/01/opinion/01wed1.html?hp
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers!
>>>>>
>>>>> Ben C.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>> __________________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/USAttorneygate--the-chickens-come-home-to-roost-tp19773205p19785728.html
Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Rhodes22-list
mailing list