[Rhodes22-list] definition "religious kook" (as requested)

[Herb Parsons]

Todd, how does what Pete wrote have anything to do with Palin.

1) I'm not aware of any laws that she passed (governers don't pass laws, 
legislators do) that fit that description
2) The list of books to be banned is a myth, no such restrictions were 
ever placed.
3) Again, the governor does not pass laws, nor did she attempt to have 
any such laws passed in her state
4) No such attempts at forcing religion to be taught in a public forum.
5) I'm curious as to how Pete knows what she "wants" to change in the 
constitution
6) I'd like to see some examples of how she's trying to deconstruct said 
boundries

And be carefule, Brother Michael will get angry if you don't state 
things as your opinion, unless they truly are fact, and we can't have a 
lefty get angry now...


Todd Tavares wrote:
> Pete, With all of these e-mails flying back and forth, I got your post
> confused with Herb's.  Herb, Pete answered the question for you.  Todd T.
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: "Herb Parsons"
>   To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List"
>   Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] definition "religious kook" (as
>   requested)
>   Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 11:38:33 -0500
>
>
>   Todd,
>
>   Do you have any examples, or is this just more left-wing venting of
>   hot air?
>
>   Todd Tavares wrote:
>   > Pete, If you changed a few words, it sound would sound exactly like
>   the
>   > present administration's foreign policy. Todd T
>   >
>   > ----- Original Message -----
>   > From: petelargo
>   > To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
>   > Subject: [Rhodes22-list] definition "religious kook" (as requested)
>   > Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 05:39:38 -0700 (PDT)
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   > an individual who is driven by their religious Belief to impose
>   their
>   > Belief
>   > on others in order to "save you" for what they believe is your own
>   > good by
>   > using their civic power and position to support and pass laws
>   > requiring your
>   > compliance with their Beliefs, hence making societal criminals out
>   of
>   > people
>   > should they not share these particular Beliefs. Always combined
>   with
>   > an
>   > inherent feeling of righteous seniority and intolerance of other
>   > beliefs,
>   > based on the belief that their Belief is superior to all other
>   > beliefs.
>   >
>   > examples: 1) supporting and imposing laws that state what you can
>   and
>   > cannot do with or put in your own body as an adult based on their
>   > specific
>   > religion 2) supporting restrictions and public bans of literature,
>   > books,
>   > movies, and art that may not support their religion 3) attempts to
>   > create
>   > laws that make their religion the 'official state' religion 4)
>   > imposing
>   > their religion as the 'truth' that must be taught in public forums
>   > over
>   > empirical contrary scientific evidence 5) wanting to change the
>   > Constitution
>   > of the United States in order to better reflect their specific
>   > religion 6)
>   > supporting deconstructing boundaries between church and state in
>   > order to
>   > more effectively implement the above
>   >
>   >
>   > --
>   > View this message in context:
>   >
>   >
>   http://www.nabble.com/definition-%22religious-kook%22-%28as-requested%29-tp19391467p19391467.html
>   > Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>   >
>   > __________________________________________________
>   > To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go
>   > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>   > __________________________________________________
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   __________________________________________________
>   To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go
>   to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>   __________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>