[Rhodes22-list] anchoring
Rik Sandberg
sanderico1 at gmail.com
Wed Sep 17 20:52:34 EDT 2008
ok fine Bill, whatever
Rik
Ayn Rand was a prophet - - it isn't my fault
Bill Effros wrote:
> Rik,
>
> At great expense, and with considerable effort, I secured 3 20 foot
> lengths of 3/8 chain to 3 trees in my yard. I then suspended my 4000
> pound boat from the chain. The 3 chains each created a line, straight
> as an arrow. What is your point?
>
> My point is that you don't need chain to pull a 2 1/2 lb anchor; and
> that the design of the anchor is such that with nothing more than a rope
> and the wind, you can drive that anchor into many bottoms with enough
> force so that it will hold a 4000 lb. boat in place in most weather
> conditions.
>
> Bill Effros
>
>
>
>
>
> Rik Sandberg wrote:
>
>> Bill,
>>
>> You like no chain. Others do, here's why.
>>
>> Chain is heavy, you're right. Take a 20 foot chain (5/16 or 3/8) and go
>> out in your yard (I assume you have a yard). Tie one end of the chain
>> to a tree. Now go to the other end of the chain and try to pull that
>> chain out so it makes a straight line. Bet you can't.
>>
>> As the boat pulls on a chain or partial chain rode, it has to lift the
>> weight of the chain as the rode tightens. This slows the boat
>> considerably before the rode becomes taut. A heavy chain rode makes
>> quite a good shock absorber.
>>
>> I'd agree that feeling the bottom and setting an anchor is surely
>> tougher with a heavy chain rode.
>>
>> And yeah, if one is just dumping his chain on top of his anchor, I guess
>> he's likely to get the results he deserves.
>>
>> Rik
>>
>> Ayn Rand was a prophet - - it isn't my fault
>>
>>
>>
>> Herb Parsons wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Bill will continue to say this is nonsense, and I'm not going to say
>>> he's wrong. I AM going to say I think he's wrong. The coast guard
>>> captain's class I took went over this, and disagrees with him. Sometimes
>>> CG folks continue to do things based on "tradition", but I think in this
>>> case, they knew what they were teaching.
>>>
>>> Bill Effros wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Rob,
>>>>
>>>> You need chain if your anchor is so heavy you can't pull it up by hand.
>>>> Then you need a windlass. The windlasses destroy rope -- they work best
>>>> on chain. Everybody makes a lot of money by suggesting that you anchor
>>>> better if you have a chain rode, but that is nonsense, and the enormous
>>>> weight of the chain in the bow totally throws off the balance of boats.
>>>>
>>>> In the process, people start drawing diagrams and providing pseudo
>>>> scientific explanations that make absolutely no sense when you start to
>>>> think about them.
>>>>
>>>> Then somebody comes up with the 22 feet of chain on the 22 foot boat
>>>> rode rule. Which also makes absolutely no sense.
>>>>
>>>> A modern anchor is not like a cinderblock or an engine block. It does
>>>> not just sit on the bottom, it digs in like a railroad spike, and is
>>>> designed so it can be easily released by changing the angle of the rode
>>>> from the surface. Adding weight does not help it in any way. Modern
>>>> anchors are designed to be pulled at specific angles -- mostly around
>>>> 45 degrees -- which is what the 7:1 scope accomplishes. Chain sitting
>>>> on the bottom defeats the angle of the scope relative to the anchor. It
>>>> is counter-productive.
>>>>
>>>> If you want more weight on your anchor, get a heavier anchor. But there
>>>> is no need to do so. A 2 1/2 lb guardian anchor, properly set, will
>>>> hold you in place forever. Your rope rode will withstand far more load
>>>> than the fittings on your boat.
>>>>
>>>> Bill Effros
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Lowe, Rob wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Bill,
>>>>> So why does everyone (well, most everyone) suggest using chain on the
>>>>> rode? - rob
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
>>>>> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of Bill Effros
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 10:59 AM
>>>>> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] anchoring
>>>>>
>>>>> Ben,
>>>>>
>>>>> In order to set the anchor you must put tension on it. This pulls the
>>>>> rode taut. When there is no wind or current, the rode will lie flat on
>>>>> the bottom, or float to the surface if it is a floating rode. But it is
>>>>>
>>>>> not holding the boat in place.
>>>>>
>>>>> What most people call "dragging the anchor" is usually "dragging the
>>>>> chain". If you fail to set your anchor -- which you will fail to set
>>>>> properly if you never draw the rode taut -- you can drag the chain all
>>>>> over the place, without ever properly setting the anchor. If you draw
>>>>> the rode taut and properly set the anchor it just won't drag.
>>>>>
>>>>> A very small anchor can be used to hold a very large boat in place if
>>>>> the anchor is properly set. It is much easier to set an anchor with an
>>>>> all rope rode. The chain portion of the rode does not change the angle
>>>>> of pull.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bill Effros
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>> __________________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>> __________________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
>
More information about the Rhodes22-list
mailing list