[Rhodes22-list] Hold on!

[TN Rhodey]

So they voted no to spite Nancy. Brilliant!  Truth be told I think this
thing needed more work and time. Wally

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Brad Haslett <flybrad at gmail.com> wrote:

> Herb,
>
> I witnessed Speaker Nancy's speech live yesterday and while cringing
> at the time, I thought the opponents would take a bullet for the
> country.  I would have.  Perhaps we both overestimated our countrymen.
>  Nancy is a cancer on our democratic process.  Hopefully, rational
> minds will prevail. She truly IS a demagogue and an idiot. My hope is
> that the process doesn't melt down over personalities.  It is truly
> regretful that the country is being held hostage by one Congressman
> from the weirdest district in these United States.
>
> Brad
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Herb Parsons <hparsons at parsonsys.com>
> wrote:
> > How not to get bi-partisan support:
> >
> > Give a speech that says , in part:
> >
> > =====
> > ...
> > It is a number that is staggering, but tells us *only the costs of the
> > Bush Administration's failed economic policies*-policies built on
> > budgetary recklessness, on an anything goes mentality, with no
> > regulation, no supervision, and no discipline in the system.
> > ...
> > *Democrats believe in the free market,* which can and does create jobs,
> > wealth, and capital, but left to its own devices it has created chaos.
> > ...
> > *Democrats insisted that legislation responding to this crisis* must
> > protect the American people and Main Street from the meltdown on Wall
> > Street.
> > ...
> > *These were the Democratic demands to safeguard the American taxpayer*,
> > to help the economy recover, and to impose tough accountability as a
> > central component of this recovery effort.
> > ...
> > Today, we will act to avert this crisis, *but informed by our experience
> > of the past eight years with the failed economic leadership *that has
> > left us left capable of meeting the challenges of the future.
> > ...
> > =====
> >
> > Note to Madame Speaker, if you want to blame the other side, and try to
> > score political points while laying all the blame at the feet of "the
> > other folks', make sure you've got ALL of your folks on board.
> >
> > If you piss off (and on) the other side, 60% of your side probably won't
> > be enough.
> >
> > Now, go back, and try again.
> >
> >
> >
> > Lowe, Rob wrote:
> >> http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/29/news/economy/bailout/index.htm?cnn=yes
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> __________________________________________________
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
> >
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe or for help with using the mailing list go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>