[Rhodes22-list] therapeutic reply to Todd that the rest of ou can skip(FOUL)

[R22RumRunner at aol.com]

Stan,
 
I'm declaring a "foul". Any post over two weeks old on the list without  
rebuttal has automatically expired. If you can't read your email and respond  
within the list term limits, you really can't have a valid argument due to 
the  fluctuation of the paraphernalia and the resistance to the co-resistance.
 
Rummy
 
 
In a message dated 2/14/2010 6:11:07 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
sloopblueheron at gmail.com writes:

Stan,

For those of us who are hero worshiping impaired,  which George Bush was
that?

Rick

On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 5:19  PM, stan <stan at rhodes22.com> wrote:

> Dear  Todd,
>
> In your e-mail of 1/20/10 you say, "don't bring me into  this",  "don't 
put
> words in my mouth" and sign "straight  shooter".   So I know you will 
allow
> me the sport, fun and  right of follow up, checking how on or off target 
you
> may  be:
>
> "don't bring me into this".   Too late  You  already brought yourself into
> our holistic issues with your prior  e-mails.
>
> In your e-mail of 12/29/09 you say I said that,  "membership to this list 
be
> conditional upon agreement to giving GB a  5% commission".  I do not 
recall
> ever saying this.  If you  can show me that quote I will apologize to the
> List.  If you  cannot, I would expect your apology to the List for putting
> words in  my mouth.
>
> In other e-mails inserting yourself in the fray, you  posted that it is 
Art
> who is being (your words) "vilified and  berated".  Come on straight 
shooter,
>  you know the fact is  it is GB who is being harassed by Art not following
> the rule of law  and breaking agreements and that it is GB who presented a
> proposal of  resolution that, as far as I know, Art has ignored.   Until  
this
> matter is equitably resolved it will keep coming up.  And,  until 
resolved,
> GB's response to calls of help from GB, will be per  George Bush's, "You 
are
> either with us or against us" - we feel that  betrayed.
>
> We will not bring you in (unless you ask) to any  future give and take on
> the issues of GB's value to re-sales or the  List's well being;.   We know
> that in your humble opinion  the GB position is "insane" and that in GB's
> humble opinion GB's  contributions to the demand and price level of 
re-sales
> and the List's  growth and longevity, are priceless - that something like 
the
> 5%  "loyalty/royalty" notion is a mad bargain.   Of course the fact that  
you
> and I are at the productive end of these 2 issues does not mean I  will 
not
> enjoy further debate with anyone else who is still not clear  on the
> arguments or even the analogies like the "Shakers", now that I  am 
adopting
> my new hero's position on basic survival conflicts  of  "Bring it on".
>
> stan/gbi
>  __________________________________________________
> To  subscribe/unsubscribe go to
>  http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>
> For the  list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> to  http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>  __________________________________________________
>
__________________________________________________
To  subscribe/unsubscribe go to  
http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list

For the list  Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go 
to  http://www.rhodes22.org/list
__________________________________________________