[Rhodes22-list] therapeutic reply to Todd that the rest of oucan skip(FOU

Ronald Lipton ronald.lipton at gmail.com
Mon Feb 15 18:34:43 EST 2010


Kill Moose and Squirrel


BenCittadino wrote:
> "All compromise is based on give and take, but there can be no give and take
> on fundamentals. Any compromise on mere fundamentals is a surrender. For it
> is all give and no take."
> Mohandas Gandhi 
>                                             or
>
> "Big trouble for Moose and Squirrel."
> Boris Badinov
>
> BenC
>
>
>
>
> R22RumRunner wrote:
>   
>> Stan,
>> Do you think it's possible that I've picked up a little bit of your logic  
>> after all these years??? Now that's a frightening thought. Me thinking
>> like  
>> Stan? Yikes. I think I need another drink. And then possibly another one.
>>  
>> Rummy
>>  
>>  
>> In a message dated 2/15/2010 9:48:22 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
>> stan at rhodes22.com writes:
>>
>> Rummy,
>>
>> I think you are onto something but someone has to  keep this company
>> afloat 
>> in the meantime for all the prior posted good  reasons.
>>
>> let me know when you are available.  the way you so  clearly defined 
>> "foul", 
>> I am sure you are going to be able to make my  points much clearer than I 
>> ever will.
>>
>> ss
>>
>> ----- Original  Message ----- 
>> From: <R22RumRunner at aol.com>
>> To:  <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2010 8:39  PM
>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] therapeutic reply to Todd that the rest of  
>> oucan skip(FOUL)
>>
>>
>>     
>>> Stan,
>>>
>>> I'm declaring a  "foul". Any post over two weeks old on the list without
>>> rebuttal has  automatically expired. If you can't read your email and 
>>>  respond
>>> within the list term limits, you really can't have a valid  argument due 
>>>       
>> to
>>     
>>> the  fluctuation of the paraphernalia and the  resistance to the 
>>> co-resistance.
>>>
>>>  Rummy
>>>
>>>
>>> In a message dated 2/14/2010 6:11:07 P.M.  Eastern Standard Time,
>>> sloopblueheron at gmail.com  writes:
>>>
>>> Stan,
>>>
>>> For those of us who are hero  worshiping impaired,  which George Bush was
>>> that?
>>>
>>>  Rick
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 5:19  PM, stan  <stan at rhodes22.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Dear   Todd,
>>>>
>>>> In your e-mail of 1/20/10 you say, "don't bring  me into  this",  "don't
>>>>         
>>> put
>>>       
>>>> words in my mouth"  and sign "straight  shooter".   So I know you will
>>>>         
>>>  allow
>>>       
>>>> me the sport, fun and  right of follow up, checking how  on or off
>>>> target
>>>>         
>>> you
>>>       
>>>> may  be:
>>>>
>>>>  "don't bring me into this".   Too late  You  already  brought yourself 
>>>> into
>>>> our holistic issues with your  prior  e-mails.
>>>>
>>>> In your e-mail of 12/29/09 you  say I said that,  "membership to this 
>>>>         
>> list
>>     
>>> be
>>>       
>>>>  conditional upon agreement to giving GB a  5% commission".  I do  not
>>>>         
>>> recall
>>>       
>>>> ever saying this.  If you  can show  me that quote I will apologize to 
>>>>         
>> the
>>     
>>>> List.  If you   cannot, I would expect your apology to the List for 
>>>>  putting
>>>> words in  my mouth.
>>>>
>>>> In other  e-mails inserting yourself in the fray, you  posted that it is
>>>>         
>>>  Art
>>>       
>>>> who is being (your words) "vilified and  berated".   Come on straight
>>>>         
>>> shooter,
>>>       
>>>>  you know the fact is   it is GB who is being harassed by Art not 
>>>> following
>>>>  the rule of law  and breaking agreements and that it is GB who 
>>>>         
>> presented  
>>     
>>>> a
>>>> proposal of  resolution that, as far as I  know, Art has ignored.  
>>>> Until
>>>>         
>>> this
>>>       
>>>> matter is  equitably resolved it will keep coming up.  And,  until
>>>>         
>>>  resolved,
>>>       
>>>> GB's response to calls of help from GB, will be  per  George Bush's,
>>>> "You
>>>>         
>>> are
>>>       
>>>> either with us or  against us" - we feel that  betrayed.
>>>>
>>>> We will not  bring you in (unless you ask) to any  future give and take 
>>>>         
>> on
>>     
>>>>  the issues of GB's value to re-sales or the  List's well  being;.   We 
>>>> know
>>>> that in your humble  opinion  the GB position is "insane" and that in 
>>>>         
>> GB's
>>     
>>>> humble  opinion GB's  contributions to the demand and price level of
>>>>         
>>>  re-sales
>>>       
>>>> and the List's  growth and longevity, are priceless  - that something 
>>>>         
>> like
>>     
>>> the
>>>       
>>>> 5%  "loyalty/royalty"  notion is a mad bargain.   Of course the fact
>>>> that
>>>>         
>>>  you
>>>       
>>>> and I are at the productive end of these 2 issues does not  mean I  will
>>>>         
>>> not
>>>       
>>>> enjoy further debate with anyone  else who is still not clear  on the
>>>> arguments or even the  analogies like the "Shakers", now that I  am
>>>>         
>>> adopting
>>>       
>>>>  my new hero's position on basic survival conflicts  of  "Bring it  on".
>>>>
>>>> stan/gbi
>>>>   __________________________________________________
>>>> To   subscribe/unsubscribe go to
>>>>   http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>>>>
>>>>  For the  list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives 
>>>>         
>>  
>>     
>>>> go
>>>> to   http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>>   __________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>  __________________________________________________
>>> To   subscribe/unsubscribe go to
>>>  http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>>>
>>> For the  list  Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives  
>>>       
>> go
>>     
>>> to  http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>  __________________________________________________
>>>
>>>  __________________________________________________
>>> To  subscribe/unsubscribe go to 
>>>  http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>>>
>>> For the  list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives 
>>>       
>> go 
>>     
>>> to  http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>  __________________________________________________  
>>>       
>> __________________________________________________
>> To  subscribe/unsubscribe go to  
>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>>
>> For the list  Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go 
>> to  http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>> __________________________________________________
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>>
>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
>> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>> __________________________________________________
>>
>>
>>     
>
>   



More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list