[Rhodes22-list] 'Getting a life', as my daughter would say

[Arthur H. Czerwonky]

Oh, Please!  I will gladly share with anyone who really needs to know the contents of the emails Stan and I shared which dissolved an informal agreement from 2006.  This matter died long ago - what fantasies bring this back onto the list?  The unpleasant venting of suggestions that my decision was unfair is itself unfair and absolutely untrue.  I agree with other members of the list that the fleet wants to be informed on new product and developments in a tasteful manner.

Art


-----Original Message-----
>From: stan <stan at rhodes22.com>
>Sent: Feb 14, 2010 5:19 PM
>To: The Rhodes 22 mail list <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>Subject: [Rhodes22-list] therapeutic reply to Todd that the rest of ou can	skip
>
>Dear Todd,
>
>In your e-mail of 1/20/10 you say, "don't bring me into this",  "don't put words in my mouth" and sign "straight shooter".   So I know you will allow me the sport, fun and right of follow up, checking how on or off target you may be:
>
>"don't bring me into this".   Too late  You already brought yourself into our holistic issues with your prior e-mails.
>
>In your e-mail of 12/29/09 you say I said that, "membership to this list be conditional upon agreement to giving GB a 5% commission".  I do not recall ever saying this.  If you can show me that quote I will apologize to the List.  If you cannot, I would expect your apology to the List for putting words in my mouth. 
>
>In other e-mails inserting yourself in the fray, you posted that it is Art who is being (your words) "vilified and berated".  Come on straight shooter,  you know the fact is it is GB who is being harassed by Art not following the rule of law and breaking agreements and that it is GB who presented a proposal of resolution that, as far as I know, Art has ignored.   Until this matter is equitably resolved it will keep coming up.  And, until resolved, GB's response to calls of help from GB, will be per George Bush's, "You are either with us or against us" - we feel that betrayed.
>
>We will not bring you in (unless you ask) to any future give and take on the issues of GB's value to re-sales or the List's well being;.   We know that in your humble opinion the GB position is "insane" and that in GB's humble opinion GB's contributions to the demand and price level of re-sales and the List's growth and longevity, are priceless - that something like the 5% "loyalty/royalty" notion is a mad bargain.   Of course the fact that you and I are at the productive end of these 2 issues does not mean I will not enjoy further debate with anyone else who is still not clear on the arguments or even the analogies like the "Shakers", now that I am adopting my new hero's position on basic survival conflicts of  "Bring it on".  
>
>stan/gbi
>__________________________________________________
>To subscribe/unsubscribe go to http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>
>For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
>__________________________________________________