[Rhodes22-list] Rhodes22-list Digest, Vol 2147, Issue 1

[Chris Cowie]

Matthew:

My Dad has a twin diesel Legacy down river from you in Spa Creek.  I try to get together with him to head over to Kentmore for crabs once a month in between sailing my Rhodes out of HHN.

http://marinas.com/view/marina/4516_Petrini_Shipyard_Annapolis_MD


Lee:

Marinas.com looks like a nice resource to check out different areas.  The map feature is pretty cool too.  Thanks for the link.

http://marinas.com/view/marina/4520_HERRINGTON_HARBOUR_NORTH_Tracys_Landing_MD



Christopher P. Cowie    


4400 MacArthur Blvd, NW 
Suite 300 
Washington, DC  20007 
202.342.2711 
202.342.2691 fax 
202.270.1470 mobile 

[ccowie at cowieassociates.com]
cowieassociates.com


-----Original Message-----
From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Porter
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 9:36 AM
To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Rhodes22-list Digest, Vol 2147, Issue 1

Hi All,

[Currently in digest mode]

Chris: We plan to put her in a slip and trailer her when the mood strikes
us.  My wife went to St. Mary's College and still has friends living in
southern Maryland; we imagine that for long weekend trips to there and other
areas, it'll be best to trailer down.

Rummy: I don't think so, he is still "getting the hang of" email and the
internet.  In any case, his name is William (Bill) Porter, affectionately
known as "Wink."  He travels a lot, so I wouldn't be surprised if anyone has
met him.  If your name was Bourbony, I'd say it was a lock.

Lee:  We have found a marina: Smith's Marina in Little Round Bay on the
Severn.  We're landlocked in Columbia, MD, but the marina is just 20 miles
from the house.

Nice to meet you all,

Porter









On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:08 AM, <rhodes22-list-request at rhodes22.org> wrote:

> Send Rhodes22-list mailing list submissions to
>        rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        rhodes22-list-request at rhodes22.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        rhodes22-list-owner at rhodes22.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Rhodes22-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Washington Sailing Marina (mputnam1 at aol.com)
>   2. Re: Washington Sailing Marina (Chris Cowie)
>   3. Re: Washington Sailing Marina (mputnam1 at aol.com)
>   4. Re: Rhodes 22 computer model (E.Andler)
>   5. Hello! (Matthew Porter)
>   6. Re: Hello! (Chris Cowie)
>   7. Re: Hello! (R22RumRunner at aol.com)
>   8. Re: Rhodes 22 computer model (KUHN, LELAND)
>   9. Re: Washington Sailing Marina (Arthur H. Czerwonky)
>  10. Re: Washington Sailing Marina (Arthur H. Czerwonky)
>  11. Re: Hello! (KUHN, LELAND)
>  12. Re: Positively positive flotation (Geankoplis)
>  13. Re: Tampa Bay (Captainpy)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:10:24 -0500
> From: mputnam1 at aol.com
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> Message-ID: <8CC8DC28AACA828-778-4B at webmail-d071.sysops.aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Stan,
>
>
> The number Mary Lou gave you is correct: 703-548-9027.  The manager's name
> is Brian Pavlik and he should be in the office today.  He's a good guy and
> I'm sure he'll answer your questions.
>
>
> Mark P.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hank <hnw555 at gmail.com>
> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Tue, Mar 9, 2010 11:06 am
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
>
>
> Stan,
>
> Maybe nobody knows for sure.  Give the Marina a call and ask them.
>
> Hank
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:01 AM, stan <stan at rhodes22.com> wrote:
>
> > I feel like Judge Judy - no one is answering my question of whether the
> > water at those slips is deep enough so that a down boat would be under
> > water.  ( I never asked and had no interest in the water in and out
> > theory).
> > I thought it was a simple question that would establish if a boat went
> down
> > no further because it was sitting on the bottom or it went down no
> further
> > because it was being supported at that level by floatation.
> >
> > ss
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Hank" <hnw555 at gmail.com>
> > To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 10:44 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >
> >
> > > Stan,
> > >
> > > I think Mark did answer your question.
> > >
> > > My boat is at the Washington Sailing Marina and it did not go down.  I
> > > asked
> > > the guys there about the storm-pushing-the-water-out theory, and they
> > > assured me that did not happen. They report that all of the boats that
> > > sank
> > > were overloaded with wet snow, began listing to one side, took on water
> > > and
> > > went down.
> > >
> > > Mark P.
> > >
> > > I couldn't find the photos on your website of the flotation test.  Did
> > you
> > > do it with the mast installed?  Was it an IMF with Sail?  From the
> photo
> > > of
> > > the boat at WSM it looks like after she took on water and flooded the
> > > cockpit, the weight of the mast cause a 90 degree roll.  I suspect that
> > > they
> > > righted her and were then able to bail/pump her out.
> > >
> > > Hank
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:31 AM, stan <stan at rhodes22.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> thanks CC - but with no indication of water depth I still can't tell
> if
> > >> the
> > >> boat is sitting on the bottom or if the floatation has succeeded in
> > >> keeping
> > >> the boat afloat even with all that flooding.
> > >>
> > >> ss
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: "cowie" <ccowie at cowieassociates.com>
> > >> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > >>  Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:29 AM
> > >> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > Stan:
> > >> >
> > >> > I previoulsy posted a pdf file that includes two photos of the
> Rhodes
> > >> > 22
> > >> > at
> > >> > the Washingtong Sailing Marina and she is not submerged rather
> flooded
> > >> > with
> > >> > water.   I will try to post the pdf file again.
> > >> >
> > >> > http://old.nabble.com/file/p27823731/r22WSM.pdf r22WSM.pdf
> > >> >
> > >> > Cowie
> > >> > R22 2009 Opus
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > stanleyl wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thanks all for the feedback but I am still flying blind here
> because
> > I
> > >> am
> > >> >> still missing the answer as to whether any of the 6 boats were
> > >> completely
> > >> >> submerged so that the deck top was under water.  I had asked that
> > >> >> question
> > >> >> to get an idea of water depth.  From what I am hearing, the Rhodes
> > was
> > >> >> never
> > >> >> completely submerged.   Were any others?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> If so, that would indicate deep water and that since the Rhodes
> deck
> > >> >> was
> > >> >> still above water, the floatation had done its job.  If all boats
> had
> > >> >> their
> > >> >> decks above water that would indicate shallow depth and therefore
> no
> > >> >> positive indication of successful floatation since the boats were
> > >> sitting
> > >> >> on
> > >> >> the bottom, not able to go down far enough to get to the flotation
> > >> level.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I am interested in getting the hard facts because it is very
> > expensive
> > >> >> for
> > >> >> us to conduct such tests and so we only did it once and those
> photos
> > >> >> showed
> > >> >> that the floatation took over when the water lever went just above
> > the
> > >> >> cockpit seat level.   We would be satisfied if the water level
> > reaches
> > >> >> the
> > >> >> cabin roof before floatation is effective.  In the only report I
> > >> >> recall
> > >> >> hearing from an owner, attorney Paul Clevenger said that a rouge
> wave
> > >> >> lifted
> > >> >> his boat and put it back in the water upside down and it floated
> and
> > >> they
> > >> >> disconnected the mast and were able to right it.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> stan/gbi
> > >> >>
> > >> >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> >> From: <mputnam1 at aol.com>
> > >> >> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > >> >> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 10:30 AM
> > >> >> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> My boat is at the Washington Sailing Marina and it did not go
> down.
> > >> >>> I
> > >> >>> asked the guys there about the storm-pushing-the-water-out theory,
> > >> >>> and
> > >> >>> they assured me that did not happen. They report that all of the
> > >> >>> boats
> > >> >>> that sank were overloaded with wet snow, began listing to one
> side,
> > >> took
> > >> >>> on water and went down.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Mark P.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >> >>> From: R22RumRunner at aol.com
> > >> >>> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> > >> >>> Sent: Mon, Mar 8, 2010 6:25 am
> > >> >>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Stan,
> > >> >>> 've been wondering about this ever since it was posted that the
> > boats
> > >> >>> went
> > >> >>> down. The only thing that makes sense to me is that this is a
> > shallow
> > >> >>> arina and  the storm pushed the water out, allowing the boats to
> > >> >>> reach
> > >> >>> the
> > >> >>> ottom. Boats  without positive flotation didn't have a chance and
> > >> >>> probably
> > >> >>> illed with water  as the water came back in. The Rhodes had the
> best
> > >> >>> chance of
> > >> >>> urvivability  because of the flotation. It was probably filled
> with
> > >> >>> water
> > >> >>> nd mud, but still  floating as the water returned.
> > >> >>> everal sailboats were laid over on Lake Hartwell when the water
> went
> > >> >>> down
> > >> >>> aster than the owners could move them. When the water level came
> > back
> > >> >>> up,
> > >> >>> any  of these boats simply filled with water and laid on the
> bottom
> > >> >>> waiting
> > >> >>> or  someone to raise them. Attached is a photo of a San Juan 25
> that
> > >> was
> > >> >>> aised  recently. It sat on the bottom for about nine months before
> > >> >>> the
> > >> >>> owner
> > >> >>> ad her  raised.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> ummy
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> n a message dated 3/7/2010 1:16:51 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> > >> >>> tan at rhodes22.com writes:
> > >> >>> Dave,
> > >> >>> I have not had a clear picture of what  happened.   Were all boats
> > >> >>> ompletely
> > >> >>> nder water or were parts  of the decks (other than the masts)
> still
> > >> >>> above
> > >> >>> ater  level?
> > >> >>> stan/gbi
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> -------------- next part --------------
> > >> >>> non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> > >> >>> ame: not available
> > >> >>> ype: image/jpeg
> > >> >>> ize: 1123147 bytes
> > >> >>> esc: not available
> > >> >>> rl :
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> >
> http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20100308/d70522bf/attachment.jpeg
> > >> >>> __________________________________________________
> > >> >>> o subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > >> >>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >> >>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> > >> >>> archives
> > >> >>> go
> > >> >>> to
> > >> >>> ttp://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >> >>> _________________________________________________
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> __________________________________________________
> > >> >>> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > >> >>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> > >> >>> archives
> > >> >>> go
> > >> >>> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >> >>> __________________________________________________
> > >> >>
> > >> >> __________________________________________________
> > >> >> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > >> >> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >> >>
> > >> >> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> > archives
> > >> go
> > >> >> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >> >> __________________________________________________
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > View this message in context:
> > >> >
> > http://old.nabble.com/Washington-Sailing-Marina-tp27816104p27823731.html
> > >> > Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >> >
> > >> > __________________________________________________
> > >> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > >> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >> >
> > >> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> archives
> > >> > go
> > >> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >> > __________________________________________________
> > >>
> > >> __________________________________________________
> > >> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > >> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >>
> > >> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> > go
> > >> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >> __________________________________________________
> > >>
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >
> > > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> > > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > __________________________________________________
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
> >
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>
> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 12:25:42 -0500
> From: "Chris Cowie" <ccowie at cowieassociates.com>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID:
>        <FB33F8F99740DB4688040C1ED75BB89F24AFCC at sbs2003.CowieSBS.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Stan:
>
> Given the other boats floating nearby I would say that the Rhodes is
> floating.
>
> Christopher P. Cowie? ??
>
>
> 4400 MacArthur Blvd, NW
> Suite 300
> Washington, DC? 20007
> 202.342.2711
> 202.342.2691 fax
> 202.270.1470 mobile
>
> [ccowie at cowieassociates.com]
> cowieassociates.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org [mailto:
> rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of stan
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 10:32 AM
> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
>
> thanks CC - but with no indication of water depth I still can't tell if the
> boat is sitting on the bottom or if the floatation has succeeded in keeping
> the boat afloat even with all that flooding.
>
> ss
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "cowie" <ccowie at cowieassociates.com>
> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
>
>
> >
> > Stan:
> >
> > I previoulsy posted a pdf file that includes two photos of the Rhodes 22
> > at
> > the Washingtong Sailing Marina and she is not submerged rather flooded
> > with
> > water.   I will try to post the pdf file again.
> >
> > http://old.nabble.com/file/p27823731/r22WSM.pdf r22WSM.pdf
> >
> > Cowie
> > R22 2009 Opus
> >
> >
> > stanleyl wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks all for the feedback but I am still flying blind here because I
> am
> >> still missing the answer as to whether any of the 6 boats were
> completely
> >> submerged so that the deck top was under water.  I had asked that
> >> question
> >> to get an idea of water depth.  From what I am hearing, the Rhodes was
> >> never
> >> completely submerged.   Were any others?
> >>
> >> If so, that would indicate deep water and that since the Rhodes deck was
> >> still above water, the floatation had done its job.  If all boats had
> >> their
> >> decks above water that would indicate shallow depth and therefore no
> >> positive indication of successful floatation since the boats were
> sitting
> >> on
> >> the bottom, not able to go down far enough to get to the flotation
> level.
> >>
> >> I am interested in getting the hard facts because it is very expensive
> >> for
> >> us to conduct such tests and so we only did it once and those photos
> >> showed
> >> that the floatation took over when the water lever went just above the
> >> cockpit seat level.   We would be satisfied if the water level reaches
> >> the
> >> cabin roof before floatation is effective.  In the only report I recall
> >> hearing from an owner, attorney Paul Clevenger said that a rouge wave
> >> lifted
> >> his boat and put it back in the water upside down and it floated and
> they
> >> disconnected the mast and were able to right it.
> >>
> >> stan/gbi
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: <mputnam1 at aol.com>
> >> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 10:30 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> My boat is at the Washington Sailing Marina and it did not go down.  I
> >>> asked the guys there about the storm-pushing-the-water-out theory, and
> >>> they assured me that did not happen. They report that all of the boats
> >>> that sank were overloaded with wet snow, began listing to one side,
> took
> >>> on water and went down.
> >>>
> >>> Mark P.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: R22RumRunner at aol.com
> >>> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> >>> Sent: Mon, Mar 8, 2010 6:25 am
> >>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Stan,
> >>> 've been wondering about this ever since it was posted that the boats
> >>> went
> >>> down. The only thing that makes sense to me is that this is a shallow
> >>> arina and  the storm pushed the water out, allowing the boats to reach
> >>> the
> >>> ottom. Boats  without positive flotation didn't have a chance and
> >>> probably
> >>> illed with water  as the water came back in. The Rhodes had the best
> >>> chance of
> >>> urvivability  because of the flotation. It was probably filled with
> >>> water
> >>> nd mud, but still  floating as the water returned.
> >>> everal sailboats were laid over on Lake Hartwell when the water went
> >>> down
> >>> aster than the owners could move them. When the water level came back
> >>> up,
> >>> any  of these boats simply filled with water and laid on the bottom
> >>> waiting
> >>> or  someone to raise them. Attached is a photo of a San Juan 25 that
> was
> >>> aised  recently. It sat on the bottom for about nine months before the
> >>> owner
> >>> ad her  raised.
> >>>
> >>> ummy
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> n a message dated 3/7/2010 1:16:51 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> >>> tan at rhodes22.com writes:
> >>> Dave,
> >>> I have not had a clear picture of what  happened.   Were all boats
> >>> ompletely
> >>> nder water or were parts  of the decks (other than the masts) still
> >>> above
> >>> ater  level?
> >>> stan/gbi
> >>>
> >>> -------------- next part --------------
> >>> non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> >>> ame: not available
> >>> ype: image/jpeg
> >>> ize: 1123147 bytes
> >>> esc: not available
> >>> rl :
> >>>
> http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20100308/d70522bf/attachment.jpeg
> >>> __________________________________________________
> >>> o subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> >>> go
> >>> to
> >>> ttp://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>> _________________________________________________
> >>>
> >>> __________________________________________________
> >>> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >>>
> >>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> >>> go
> >>> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>> __________________________________________________
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >>
> >> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> >> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> __________________________________________________
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://old.nabble.com/Washington-Sailing-Marina-tp27816104p27823731.html
> > Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>
> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2720 - Release Date: 03/09/10
> 02:33:00
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:24:57 -0500
> From: mputnam1 at aol.com
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> Message-ID: <8CC8DC4932C65DA-778-532 at webmail-d071.sysops.aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Stan's right -- we can't know for sure if the boat was floating in the
> picture -- there are fairly significant tides in the marina, so who knows if
> it's low or high tide.  I can't find the photos to take a look at the docks
> relative to the land.
>
>
> Mark P.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Cowie <ccowie at cowieassociates.com>
> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Tue, Mar 9, 2010 12:25 pm
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
>
>
> Stan:
>
> Given the other boats floating nearby I would say that the Rhodes is
> floating.
>
> Christopher P. Cowie
>
>
> 4400 MacArthur Blvd, NW
> Suite 300
> Washington, DC  20007
> 202.342.2711
> 202.342.2691 fax
> 202.270.1470 mobile
>
> [ccowie at cowieassociates.com]
> cowieassociates.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org [mailto:
> rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org]
> On Behalf Of stan
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 10:32 AM
> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
>
> thanks CC - but with no indication of water depth I still can't tell if the
> boat is sitting on the bottom or if the floatation has succeeded in keeping
> the boat afloat even with all that flooding.
>
> ss
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "cowie" <ccowie at cowieassociates.com>
> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
>
>
> >
> > Stan:
> >
> > I previoulsy posted a pdf file that includes two photos of the Rhodes 22
> > at
> > the Washingtong Sailing Marina and she is not submerged rather flooded
> > with
> > water.   I will try to post the pdf file again.
> >
> > http://old.nabble.com/file/p27823731/r22WSM.pdf r22WSM.pdf
> >
> > Cowie
> > R22 2009 Opus
> >
> >
> > stanleyl wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks all for the feedback but I am still flying blind here because I
> am
> >> still missing the answer as to whether any of the 6 boats were
> completely
> >> submerged so that the deck top was under water.  I had asked that
> >> question
> >> to get an idea of water depth.  From what I am hearing, the Rhodes was
> >> never
> >> completely submerged.   Were any others?
> >>
> >> If so, that would indicate deep water and that since the Rhodes deck was
> >> still above water, the floatation had done its job.  If all boats had
> >> their
> >> decks above water that would indicate shallow depth and therefore no
> >> positive indication of successful floatation since the boats were
> sitting
> >> on
> >> the bottom, not able to go down far enough to get to the flotation
> level.
> >>
> >> I am interested in getting the hard facts because it is very expensive
> >> for
> >> us to conduct such tests and so we only did it once and those photos
> >> showed
> >> that the floatation took over when the water lever went just above the
> >> cockpit seat level.   We would be satisfied if the water level reaches
> >> the
> >> cabin roof before floatation is effective.  In the only report I recall
> >> hearing from an owner, attorney Paul Clevenger said that a rouge wave
> >> lifted
> >> his boat and put it back in the water upside down and it floated and
> they
> >> disconnected the mast and were able to right it.
> >>
> >> stan/gbi
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: <mputnam1 at aol.com>
> >> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 10:30 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> My boat is at the Washington Sailing Marina and it did not go down.  I
> >>> asked the guys there about the storm-pushing-the-water-out theory, and
> >>> they assured me that did not happen. They report that all of the boats
> >>> that sank were overloaded with wet snow, began listing to one side,
> took
> >>> on water and went down.
> >>>
> >>> Mark P.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: R22RumRunner at aol.com
> >>> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> >>> Sent: Mon, Mar 8, 2010 6:25 am
> >>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Stan,
> >>> 've been wondering about this ever since it was posted that the boats
> >>> went
> >>> down. The only thing that makes sense to me is that this is a shallow
> >>> arina and  the storm pushed the water out, allowing the boats to reach
> >>> the
> >>> ottom. Boats  without positive flotation didn't have a chance and
> >>> probably
> >>> illed with water  as the water came back in. The Rhodes had the best
> >>> chance of
> >>> urvivability  because of the flotation. It was probably filled with
> >>> water
> >>> nd mud, but still  floating as the water returned.
> >>> everal sailboats were laid over on Lake Hartwell when the water went
> >>> down
> >>> aster than the owners could move them. When the water level came back
> >>> up,
> >>> any  of these boats simply filled with water and laid on the bottom
> >>> waiting
> >>> or  someone to raise them. Attached is a photo of a San Juan 25 that
> was
> >>> aised  recently. It sat on the bottom for about nine months before the
> >>> owner
> >>> ad her  raised.
> >>>
> >>> ummy
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> n a message dated 3/7/2010 1:16:51 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> >>> tan at rhodes22.com writes:
> >>> Dave,
> >>> I have not had a clear picture of what  happened.   Were all boats
> >>> ompletely
> >>> nder water or were parts  of the decks (other than the masts) still
> >>> above
> >>> ater  level?
> >>> stan/gbi
> >>>
> >>> -------------- next part --------------
> >>> non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> >>> ame: not available
> >>> ype: image/jpeg
> >>> ize: 1123147 bytes
> >>> esc: not available
> >>> rl :
> >>>
> http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20100308/d70522bf/attachment.jpeg
> >>> __________________________________________________
> >>> o subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> >>> go
> >>> to
> >>> ttp://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>> _________________________________________________
> >>>
> >>> __________________________________________________
> >>> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >>>
> >>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> >>> go
> >>> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>> __________________________________________________
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >>
> >> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> >> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> __________________________________________________
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://old.nabble.com/Washington-Sailing-Marina-tp27816104p27823731.html
> > Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>
> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2720 - Release Date: 03/09/10
> 02:33:00
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>
> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
>
> =
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:12:43 -0500
> From: "E.Andler" <edward.andler at verizon.net>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Rhodes 22 computer model
> To: "'The Rhodes 22 Email List'" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID: <D93AFEF05D204904A89A616016A64494 at owner9d0456dc8>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> Not bad for only being a second semester freshman
> The kid's got talent.............
> (Sorry for the parental bragging)
> Ed
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of cowie
> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 3:52 PM
> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Rhodes 22 computer model
>
>
> Your son's (in) tuition is right on.  I spent about 1/2 hour drafting
> three
> schematic hull sections and then used the "loft" command, imported the
> hull
> resultant hull shape into google earth, added a mast and boom and wala I
> have a goofy looking Rhodes 22 shape.  Now tell your son you have a
> summer
> project for him to measure your boat and create a more accurate computer
> model.
>
> Enclosed is a pdf file with three images.
>
> http://old.nabble.com/file/p27786391/r22.pdf r22.pdf
>
>
>
> Edward-58 wrote:
> >
> > Chris & Mike:
> > I forwarded your emails about the free Cad program to my son who is a
> > Mechanical Engineering student (He has used the Google program
> before.)
> > He also responded on how to mold a 3D hull on a Cad program
> > I'm going to cut & paste what he said because I have no idea what he
> is
> > talking about (I sell empty bottles for a living) If his suggestion
> > works its nice to know he is actually learning something at school
> > I would love to see if someone can do it using this method
> > Keep me informed
> > Good Luck
> > Ed A
> > Here is his response:
> >       "You can tell them the easiest way to get the boat curves
> > accurately is to make a few section cuts in 2D (using polylines),
> align
> > them in 3D space, and then use the LOFT command in autoCAD so that you
> > can accurately reflect the fact that both the XY and XZ planes of the
> > boat are curving simultaneously at different angles (ie the hull
> curves
> > both downwards towards the water and backwards from the bow to the
> > stern)"
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> > [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of cowie
> > Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 2:20 PM
> > To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] The best little drafting program and it's
> > free!
> >
> >
> > Mike:
> >
> > I have been using AutoCad, AutoCad Architect and more recently
> Autodesk
> > Revit for architectural design and drafting in addition to Sketch up
> for
> > design illustrations.  AutoCad Architect tried to be a 3D design and
> > drafting tool but Revit has taken this idea much further.  Revit
> allows
> > us
> > to build a virtual model in 3d and test relationships of various
> design
> > elements and  create a set of construction documents and renderings
> from
> > the
> > single model file.  The various components within the model such as
> > doors,
> > windows, walls etc... have smart dynamic attributes that can be linked
> > to
> > various tables, charts, product web sites, quantity tables, contractor
> > cost
> > estimates etc...
> >
> > We used to use 3d studio max to create 3d renderings but this was much
> > too
> > complicated a program.  Sketchup is a great product.  I think Google
> has
> > the
> > right idea in providing this univeral, easy to use product to a mass
> > market
> > for free.  Autodesk robs us every year with a mandatory subscription
> > that
> > cost me over $700 per each of my five liscenses.  Sketchup does not
> > produce
> > the same level of documentation as Revit however so I am stuck
> > supporting
> > Revit.
> >
> > I would love to see if anyone has success in creating a 3d model of
> the
> > Rhodes 22 in sketchup or any other program.  I explored this a bit but
> > the
> > complex hull curvature makes it a real challange.  My goal is to map
> out
> > electronic and other components in a 3d model of our boats.  Let me
> know
> > if
> > anyone has success in this.  It would be pretty easy to share sketchup
> > models and collaborate.
> >
> >
> > Google warehouse is a good place to look for existing models.
> Enclosed
> > is
> > an imgage from a sailboat model found in the google warehouse.
> >
> > http://old.nabble.com/file/p27737330/sailboat50.jpg sailboat50.jpg
> >
> > Chris Cowie
> > Opus R22 2009
> >
> >
> > R22MikeW wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi fellow Rhodies,
> >>
> >> I got tired of trying to do diagrams in Windows Paint program and
> > didn't
> >> feel like purchasing a license / copy of AutoCAD ($$$$) for simple
> >> documentation drawings for the boat and home.  I turned to Google
> > search
> >> and found a product that I still cannot believe is FREE!  It is
> called
> >> Google SketchUp (http://sketchup.google.com/).  I doubt any of us
> need
> >> SketchUp Pro ($495.)  I downloaded a copy of SketchUp 7 and watched
> > the
> >> video tutorials.  The product is outrageous!  3D perspective drawings
> > are
> >> a breeze.  Auto-dimensioning, textures, everything that I could ask
> > for!
> >> Very intuitive and forgiving (love the infinite undo levels!)  Try it
> >> before they raise the price!
> >>
> >> Mike
> >> s/v Shanghai'd Summer ('81)
> >> Nissequogue River, NY
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >>
> >> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> archives
> > go
> >> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> __________________________________________________
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://old.nabble.com/The-best-little-drafting-program-and-it%27s-free%2
> > 1-tp27731255p27737330.html
> > Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> > go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
> >
> >
> http://old.nabble.com/file/p27786391/r22.pdf r22.pdf
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/The-best-little-drafting-program-and-it%27s-free%2
> 1-tp27731255p27786391.html<http://old.nabble.com/The-best-little-drafting-program-and-it%27s-free%2%0A1-tp27731255p27786391.html>
> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>
> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 15:15:28 -0500
> From: Matthew Porter <matthewporter27 at gmail.com>
> Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Hello!
> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> Message-ID:
>        <212aa3ea1003091215v357808b7hb9734263b0be2ebd at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm new to the list and wanted to introduce myself.  I'm the soon-to-be
> owner of a 1995/2002 Rhodes 22.  My uncle has decided that he'll get more
> enjoyment out of his Rhodes if he gives her to me, his (very lucky and
> appreciative) nephew who happens to live in Maryland with easy access to
> the
> Severn River and Chesapeake Bay.
>
> I've enjoyed reading through your list archives and getting an insider's
> perspective on the Rhodes 22.  My wife and I are still a bit in shock over
> the "inheritance;" my uncle (who would be the first to tell you that he's
> the king stupid purchases) seems to have picked the perfect boat.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Matt Porter
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 15:47:27 -0500
> From: "Chris Cowie" <ccowie at cowieassociates.com>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Hello!
> To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID:
>        <FB33F8F99740DB4688040C1ED75BB89F24AFE2 at sbs2003.CowieSBS.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Matt:
>
> Welcome to the list and congratulations on your inheritance. This will be
> my second season sailing my Rhodes 2009.  The Chesapeake Bay is a great
> place to sail.  Do you plan to trailer your boat or put her in a slip?  I am
> in a slip at Herrington Harbor North.
>
> Christopher P. Cowie? ??
>
>
> 4400 MacArthur Blvd, NW
> Suite 300
> Washington, DC? 20007
> 202.342.2711
> 202.342.2691 fax
> 202.270.1470 mobile
>
> [ccowie at cowieassociates.com]
> cowieassociates.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org [mailto:
> rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Porter
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 3:15 PM
> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Hello!
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm new to the list and wanted to introduce myself.  I'm the soon-to-be
> owner of a 1995/2002 Rhodes 22.  My uncle has decided that he'll get more
> enjoyment out of his Rhodes if he gives her to me, his (very lucky and
> appreciative) nephew who happens to live in Maryland with easy access to
> the
> Severn River and Chesapeake Bay.
>
> I've enjoyed reading through your list archives and getting an insider's
> perspective on the Rhodes 22.  My wife and I are still a bit in shock over
> the "inheritance;" my uncle (who would be the first to tell you that he's
> the king stupid purchases) seems to have picked the perfect boat.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Matt Porter
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>
> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2720 - Release Date: 03/09/10
> 02:33:00
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 16:02:40 EST
> From: R22RumRunner at aol.com
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Hello!
> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> Message-ID: <2bb2b.7ba33e30.38c81170 at aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> Matt, Welcome to the list. Any chance we would know your uncle????
>
> Rummy
>
>
> In a message dated 3/9/2010 3:15:48 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> matthewporter27 at gmail.com writes:
>
> Hello  everyone,
>
> I'm new to the list and wanted to introduce myself.  I'm  the soon-to-be
> owner of a 1995/2002 Rhodes 22.  My uncle has decided  that he'll get more
> enjoyment out of his Rhodes if he gives her to me, his  (very lucky and
> appreciative) nephew who happens to live in Maryland with  easy access to
> the
> Severn River and Chesapeake Bay.
>
> I've enjoyed  reading through your list archives and getting an insider's
> perspective on  the Rhodes 22.  My wife and I are still a bit in shock over
> the  "inheritance;" my uncle (who would be the first to tell you that he's
> the  king stupid purchases) seems to have picked the perfect boat.
>
> Best  regards,
>
> Matt  Porter
> __________________________________________________
> To  subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>
> For the list  Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> to  http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 14:24:36 -0500
> From: "KUHN, LELAND" <LKUHN at cnmc.org>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Rhodes 22 computer model
> To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID:
>        <BAEF334992594C47AD272D6B69E6C36002348827 at EXCHVS02.cnmc.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"
>
> Ed,
>
> I'm also impressed with your son, but what do I know.  I thought a Cad
> was the opposite of a Gentleman.
>
> Lee
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of E.Andler
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 2:13 PM
> To: 'The Rhodes 22 Email List'
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Rhodes 22 computer model
>
> Not bad for only being a second semester freshman
> The kid's got talent.............
> (Sorry for the parental bragging)
> Ed
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of cowie
> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 3:52 PM
> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Rhodes 22 computer model
>
>
> Your son's (in) tuition is right on.  I spent about 1/2 hour drafting
> three
> schematic hull sections and then used the "loft" command, imported the
> hull
> resultant hull shape into google earth, added a mast and boom and wala I
> have a goofy looking Rhodes 22 shape.  Now tell your son you have a
> summer
> project for him to measure your boat and create a more accurate computer
> model.
>
> Enclosed is a pdf file with three images.
>
> http://old.nabble.com/file/p27786391/r22.pdf r22.pdf
>
>
>
> Edward-58 wrote:
> >
> > Chris & Mike:
> > I forwarded your emails about the free Cad program to my son who is a
> > Mechanical Engineering student (He has used the Google program
> before.)
> > He also responded on how to mold a 3D hull on a Cad program
> > I'm going to cut & paste what he said because I have no idea what he
> is
> > talking about (I sell empty bottles for a living) If his suggestion
> > works its nice to know he is actually learning something at school
> > I would love to see if someone can do it using this method
> > Keep me informed
> > Good Luck
> > Ed A
> > Here is his response:
> >       "You can tell them the easiest way to get the boat curves
> > accurately is to make a few section cuts in 2D (using polylines),
> align
> > them in 3D space, and then use the LOFT command in autoCAD so that you
> > can accurately reflect the fact that both the XY and XZ planes of the
> > boat are curving simultaneously at different angles (ie the hull
> curves
> > both downwards towards the water and backwards from the bow to the
> > stern)"
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> > [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of cowie
> > Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 2:20 PM
> > To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] The best little drafting program and it's
> > free!
> >
> >
> > Mike:
> >
> > I have been using AutoCad, AutoCad Architect and more recently
> Autodesk
> > Revit for architectural design and drafting in addition to Sketch up
> for
> > design illustrations.  AutoCad Architect tried to be a 3D design and
> > drafting tool but Revit has taken this idea much further.  Revit
> allows
> > us
> > to build a virtual model in 3d and test relationships of various
> design
> > elements and  create a set of construction documents and renderings
> from
> > the
> > single model file.  The various components within the model such as
> > doors,
> > windows, walls etc... have smart dynamic attributes that can be linked
> > to
> > various tables, charts, product web sites, quantity tables, contractor
> > cost
> > estimates etc...
> >
> > We used to use 3d studio max to create 3d renderings but this was much
> > too
> > complicated a program.  Sketchup is a great product.  I think Google
> has
> > the
> > right idea in providing this univeral, easy to use product to a mass
> > market
> > for free.  Autodesk robs us every year with a mandatory subscription
> > that
> > cost me over $700 per each of my five liscenses.  Sketchup does not
> > produce
> > the same level of documentation as Revit however so I am stuck
> > supporting
> > Revit.
> >
> > I would love to see if anyone has success in creating a 3d model of
> the
> > Rhodes 22 in sketchup or any other program.  I explored this a bit but
> > the
> > complex hull curvature makes it a real challange.  My goal is to map
> out
> > electronic and other components in a 3d model of our boats.  Let me
> know
> > if
> > anyone has success in this.  It would be pretty easy to share sketchup
> > models and collaborate.
> >
> >
> > Google warehouse is a good place to look for existing models.
> Enclosed
> > is
> > an imgage from a sailboat model found in the google warehouse.
> >
> > http://old.nabble.com/file/p27737330/sailboat50.jpg sailboat50.jpg
> >
> > Chris Cowie
> > Opus R22 2009
> >
> >
> > R22MikeW wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi fellow Rhodies,
> >>
> >> I got tired of trying to do diagrams in Windows Paint program and
> > didn't
> >> feel like purchasing a license / copy of AutoCAD ($$$$) for simple
> >> documentation drawings for the boat and home.  I turned to Google
> > search
> >> and found a product that I still cannot believe is FREE!  It is
> called
> >> Google SketchUp (http://sketchup.google.com/).  I doubt any of us
> need
> >> SketchUp Pro ($495.)  I downloaded a copy of SketchUp 7 and watched
> > the
> >> video tutorials.  The product is outrageous!  3D perspective drawings
> > are
> >> a breeze.  Auto-dimensioning, textures, everything that I could ask
> > for!
> >> Very intuitive and forgiving (love the infinite undo levels!)  Try it
> >> before they raise the price!
> >>
> >> Mike
> >> s/v Shanghai'd Summer ('81)
> >> Nissequogue River, NY
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >>
> >> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> archives
> > go
> >> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> __________________________________________________
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://old.nabble.com/The-best-little-drafting-program-and-it%27s-free%2
> > 1-tp27731255p27737330.html
> > Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> > go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
> >
> >
> http://old.nabble.com/file/p27786391/r22.pdf r22.pdf
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/The-best-little-drafting-program-and-it%27s-free%2
> 1-tp27731255p27786391.html<http://old.nabble.com/The-best-little-drafting-program-and-it%27s-free%2%0A1-tp27731255p27786391.html>
> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>
> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>
> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
> for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
> unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
> e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 16:51:59 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
> From: "Arthur H. Czerwonky" <czerwonky at earthlink.net>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID:
>        <
> 14239596.1268171519898.JavaMail.root at elwamui-ovcar.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Parts of the Potomac are quite shallow, and this may be the case here.  At
> least some of the airport, not too distant from this marina, was built onto
> landfill.  You may be able to get a depth, Mark.
>
> Art
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: mputnam1 at aol.com
> >Sent: Mar 9, 2010 12:24 PM
> >To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> >Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >
> >Stan's right -- we can't know for sure if the boat was floating in the
> picture -- there are fairly significant tides in the marina, so who knows if
> it's low or high tide.  I can't find the photos to take a look at the docks
> relative to the land.
> >
> >
> >Mark P.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Chris Cowie <ccowie at cowieassociates.com>
> >To: The Rhodes 22 Email List <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >Sent: Tue, Mar 9, 2010 12:25 pm
> >Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >
> >
> >Stan:
> >
> >Given the other boats floating nearby I would say that the Rhodes is
> floating.
> >
> >Christopher P. Cowie
> >
> >
> >4400 MacArthur Blvd, NW
> >Suite 300
> >Washington, DC  20007
> >202.342.2711
> >202.342.2691 fax
> >202.270.1470 mobile
> >
> >[ccowie at cowieassociates.com]
> >cowieassociates.com
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org [mailto:
> rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org]
> >On Behalf Of stan
> >Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 10:32 AM
> >To: The Rhodes 22 Email List
> >Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >
> >thanks CC - but with no indication of water depth I still can't tell if
> the
> >boat is sitting on the bottom or if the floatation has succeeded in
> keeping
> >the boat afloat even with all that flooding.
> >
> >ss
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "cowie" <ccowie at cowieassociates.com>
> >To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:29 AM
> >Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Stan:
> >>
> >> I previoulsy posted a pdf file that includes two photos of the Rhodes 22
> >> at
> >> the Washingtong Sailing Marina and she is not submerged rather flooded
> >> with
> >> water.   I will try to post the pdf file again.
> >>
> >> http://old.nabble.com/file/p27823731/r22WSM.pdf r22WSM.pdf
> >>
> >> Cowie
> >> R22 2009 Opus
> >>
> >>
> >> stanleyl wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks all for the feedback but I am still flying blind here because I
> am
> >>> still missing the answer as to whether any of the 6 boats were
> completely
> >>> submerged so that the deck top was under water.  I had asked that
> >>> question
> >>> to get an idea of water depth.  From what I am hearing, the Rhodes was
> >>> never
> >>> completely submerged.   Were any others?
> >>>
> >>> If so, that would indicate deep water and that since the Rhodes deck
> was
> >>> still above water, the floatation had done its job.  If all boats had
> >>> their
> >>> decks above water that would indicate shallow depth and therefore no
> >>> positive indication of successful floatation since the boats were
> sitting
> >>> on
> >>> the bottom, not able to go down far enough to get to the flotation
> level.
> >>>
> >>> I am interested in getting the hard facts because it is very expensive
> >>> for
> >>> us to conduct such tests and so we only did it once and those photos
> >>> showed
> >>> that the floatation took over when the water lever went just above the
> >>> cockpit seat level.   We would be satisfied if the water level reaches
> >>> the
> >>> cabin roof before floatation is effective.  In the only report I recall
> >>> hearing from an owner, attorney Paul Clevenger said that a rouge wave
> >>> lifted
> >>> his boat and put it back in the water upside down and it floated and
> they
> >>> disconnected the mast and were able to right it.
> >>>
> >>> stan/gbi
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: <mputnam1 at aol.com>
> >>> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >>> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 10:30 AM
> >>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> My boat is at the Washington Sailing Marina and it did not go down.  I
> >>>> asked the guys there about the storm-pushing-the-water-out theory, and
> >>>> they assured me that did not happen. They report that all of the boats
> >>>> that sank were overloaded with wet snow, began listing to one side,
> took
> >>>> on water and went down.
> >>>>
> >>>> Mark P.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: R22RumRunner at aol.com
> >>>> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> >>>> Sent: Mon, Mar 8, 2010 6:25 am
> >>>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Stan,
> >>>> 've been wondering about this ever since it was posted that the boats
> >>>> went
> >>>> down. The only thing that makes sense to me is that this is a shallow
> >>>> arina and  the storm pushed the water out, allowing the boats to reach
> >>>> the
> >>>> ottom. Boats  without positive flotation didn't have a chance and
> >>>> probably
> >>>> illed with water  as the water came back in. The Rhodes had the best
> >>>> chance of
> >>>> urvivability  because of the flotation. It was probably filled with
> >>>> water
> >>>> nd mud, but still  floating as the water returned.
> >>>> everal sailboats were laid over on Lake Hartwell when the water went
> >>>> down
> >>>> aster than the owners could move them. When the water level came back
> >>>> up,
> >>>> any  of these boats simply filled with water and laid on the bottom
> >>>> waiting
> >>>> or  someone to raise them. Attached is a photo of a San Juan 25 that
> was
> >>>> aised  recently. It sat on the bottom for about nine months before the
> >>>> owner
> >>>> ad her  raised.
> >>>>
> >>>> ummy
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> n a message dated 3/7/2010 1:16:51 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> >>>> tan at rhodes22.com writes:
> >>>> Dave,
> >>>> I have not had a clear picture of what  happened.   Were all boats
> >>>> ompletely
> >>>> nder water or were parts  of the decks (other than the masts) still
> >>>> above
> >>>> ater  level?
> >>>> stan/gbi
> >>>>
> >>>> -------------- next part --------------
> >>>> non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> >>>> ame: not available
> >>>> ype: image/jpeg
> >>>> ize: 1123147 bytes
> >>>> esc: not available
> >>>> rl :
> >>>>
> http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20100308/d70522bf/attachment.jpeg
> >>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>> o subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >>>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> >>>> go
> >>>> to
> >>>> ttp://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>>> _________________________________________________
> >>>>
> >>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >>>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >>>>
> >>>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> >>>> go
> >>>> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>>> __________________________________________________
> >>>
> >>> __________________________________________________
> >>> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >>>
> >>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> >>> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>> __________________________________________________
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://old.nabble.com/Washington-Sailing-Marina-tp27816104p27823731.html
> >> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >>
> >> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> >> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> __________________________________________________
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> >For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> to
> >http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >__________________________________________________
> >
> >No virus found in this incoming message.
> >Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> >Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2720 - Release Date: 03/09/10
> >02:33:00
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> >For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> to
> >http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >__________________________________________________
> >
> >
> >=
> >__________________________________________________
> >To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> >For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >__________________________________________________
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 16:59:20 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
> From: "Arthur H. Czerwonky" <czerwonky at earthlink.net>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID:
>        <
> 25957659.1268171961011.JavaMail.root at mswamui-swiss.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Maybe of interest in our fleet.  I have been quite impressed with a new
> Garmin 10X, available only thru them.  It is quite small with LiIon 22 hr
> power, bluetooth connecting and impressive.  Give me a holler if curious.
>
> Art
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: mputnam1 at aol.com
> >Sent: Mar 9, 2010 12:10 PM
> >To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> >Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >
> >Stan,
> >
> >
> >The number Mary Lou gave you is correct: 703-548-9027.  The manager's name
> is Brian Pavlik and he should be in the office today.  He's a good guy and
> I'm sure he'll answer your questions.
> >
> >
> >Mark P.
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Hank <hnw555 at gmail.com>
> >To: The Rhodes 22 Email List <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >Sent: Tue, Mar 9, 2010 11:06 am
> >Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >
> >
> >Stan,
> >
> >Maybe nobody knows for sure.  Give the Marina a call and ask them.
> >
> >Hank
> >
> >On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:01 AM, stan <stan at rhodes22.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I feel like Judge Judy - no one is answering my question of whether the
> >> water at those slips is deep enough so that a down boat would be under
> >> water.  ( I never asked and had no interest in the water in and out
> >> theory).
> >> I thought it was a simple question that would establish if a boat went
> down
> >> no further because it was sitting on the bottom or it went down no
> further
> >> because it was being supported at that level by floatation.
> >>
> >> ss
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Hank" <hnw555 at gmail.com>
> >> To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 10:44 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >>
> >>
> >> > Stan,
> >> >
> >> > I think Mark did answer your question.
> >> >
> >> > My boat is at the Washington Sailing Marina and it did not go down.  I
> >> > asked
> >> > the guys there about the storm-pushing-the-water-out theory, and they
> >> > assured me that did not happen. They report that all of the boats that
> >> > sank
> >> > were overloaded with wet snow, began listing to one side, took on
> water
> >> > and
> >> > went down.
> >> >
> >> > Mark P.
> >> >
> >> > I couldn't find the photos on your website of the flotation test.  Did
> >> you
> >> > do it with the mast installed?  Was it an IMF with Sail?  From the
> photo
> >> > of
> >> > the boat at WSM it looks like after she took on water and flooded the
> >> > cockpit, the weight of the mast cause a 90 degree roll.  I suspect
> that
> >> > they
> >> > righted her and were then able to bail/pump her out.
> >> >
> >> > Hank
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:31 AM, stan <stan at rhodes22.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> thanks CC - but with no indication of water depth I still can't tell
> if
> >> >> the
> >> >> boat is sitting on the bottom or if the floatation has succeeded in
> >> >> keeping
> >> >> the boat afloat even with all that flooding.
> >> >>
> >> >> ss
> >> >>
> >> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> >> From: "cowie" <ccowie at cowieassociates.com>
> >> >> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >> >>  Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:29 AM
> >> >> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Stan:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I previoulsy posted a pdf file that includes two photos of the
> Rhodes
> >> >> > 22
> >> >> > at
> >> >> > the Washingtong Sailing Marina and she is not submerged rather
> flooded
> >> >> > with
> >> >> > water.   I will try to post the pdf file again.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > http://old.nabble.com/file/p27823731/r22WSM.pdf r22WSM.pdf
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Cowie
> >> >> > R22 2009 Opus
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > stanleyl wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Thanks all for the feedback but I am still flying blind here
> because
> >> I
> >> >> am
> >> >> >> still missing the answer as to whether any of the 6 boats were
> >> >> completely
> >> >> >> submerged so that the deck top was under water.  I had asked that
> >> >> >> question
> >> >> >> to get an idea of water depth.  From what I am hearing, the Rhodes
> >> was
> >> >> >> never
> >> >> >> completely submerged.   Were any others?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> If so, that would indicate deep water and that since the Rhodes
> deck
> >> >> >> was
> >> >> >> still above water, the floatation had done its job.  If all boats
> had
> >> >> >> their
> >> >> >> decks above water that would indicate shallow depth and therefore
> no
> >> >> >> positive indication of successful floatation since the boats were
> >> >> sitting
> >> >> >> on
> >> >> >> the bottom, not able to go down far enough to get to the flotation
> >> >> level.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I am interested in getting the hard facts because it is very
> >> expensive
> >> >> >> for
> >> >> >> us to conduct such tests and so we only did it once and those
> photos
> >> >> >> showed
> >> >> >> that the floatation took over when the water lever went just above
> >> the
> >> >> >> cockpit seat level.   We would be satisfied if the water level
> >> reaches
> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> cabin roof before floatation is effective.  In the only report I
> >> >> >> recall
> >> >> >> hearing from an owner, attorney Paul Clevenger said that a rouge
> wave
> >> >> >> lifted
> >> >> >> his boat and put it back in the water upside down and it floated
> and
> >> >> they
> >> >> >> disconnected the mast and were able to right it.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> stan/gbi
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> >> >> From: <mputnam1 at aol.com>
> >> >> >> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >> >> >> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 10:30 AM
> >> >> >> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> My boat is at the Washington Sailing Marina and it did not go
> down.
> >> >> >>> I
> >> >> >>> asked the guys there about the storm-pushing-the-water-out
> theory,
> >> >> >>> and
> >> >> >>> they assured me that did not happen. They report that all of the
> >> >> >>> boats
> >> >> >>> that sank were overloaded with wet snow, began listing to one
> side,
> >> >> took
> >> >> >>> on water and went down.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Mark P.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> >>> From: R22RumRunner at aol.com
> >> >> >>> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> >> >> >>> Sent: Mon, Mar 8, 2010 6:25 am
> >> >> >>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Stan,
> >> >> >>> 've been wondering about this ever since it was posted that the
> >> boats
> >> >> >>> went
> >> >> >>> down. The only thing that makes sense to me is that this is a
> >> shallow
> >> >> >>> arina and  the storm pushed the water out, allowing the boats to
> >> >> >>> reach
> >> >> >>> the
> >> >> >>> ottom. Boats  without positive flotation didn't have a chance and
> >> >> >>> probably
> >> >> >>> illed with water  as the water came back in. The Rhodes had the
> best
> >> >> >>> chance of
> >> >> >>> urvivability  because of the flotation. It was probably filled
> with
> >> >> >>> water
> >> >> >>> nd mud, but still  floating as the water returned.
> >> >> >>> everal sailboats were laid over on Lake Hartwell when the water
> went
> >> >> >>> down
> >> >> >>> aster than the owners could move them. When the water level came
> >> back
> >> >> >>> up,
> >> >> >>> any  of these boats simply filled with water and laid on the
> bottom
> >> >> >>> waiting
> >> >> >>> or  someone to raise them. Attached is a photo of a San Juan 25
> that
> >> >> was
> >> >> >>> aised  recently. It sat on the bottom for about nine months
> before
> >> >> >>> the
> >> >> >>> owner
> >> >> >>> ad her  raised.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> ummy
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> n a message dated 3/7/2010 1:16:51 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> >> >> >>> tan at rhodes22.com writes:
> >> >> >>> Dave,
> >> >> >>> I have not had a clear picture of what  happened.   Were all
> boats
> >> >> >>> ompletely
> >> >> >>> nder water or were parts  of the decks (other than the masts)
> still
> >> >> >>> above
> >> >> >>> ater  level?
> >> >> >>> stan/gbi
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> -------------- next part --------------
> >> >> >>> non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> >> >> >>> ame: not available
> >> >> >>> ype: image/jpeg
> >> >> >>> ize: 1123147 bytes
> >> >> >>> esc: not available
> >> >> >>> rl :
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20100308/d70522bf/attachment.jpeg
> >> >> >>> __________________________________________________
> >> >> >>> o subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >> >> >>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >> >> >>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> >> >> >>> archives
> >> >> >>> go
> >> >> >>> to
> >> >> >>> ttp://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> >> >>> _________________________________________________
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> __________________________________________________
> >> >> >>> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >> >> >>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> >> >> >>> archives
> >> >> >>> go
> >> >> >>> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> >> >>> __________________________________________________
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> __________________________________________________
> >> >> >> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >> >> >> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> >> archives
> >> >> go
> >> >> >> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> >> >> __________________________________________________
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > View this message in context:
> >> >> >
> >>
> http://old.nabble.com/Washington-Sailing-Marina-tp27816104p27823731.html
> >> >> > Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > __________________________________________________
> >> >> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >> >> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >> >> >
> >> >> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> archives
> >> >> > go
> >> >> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> >> > __________________________________________________
> >> >>
> >> >> __________________________________________________
> >> >> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >> >> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >> >>
> >> >> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> archives
> >> go
> >> >> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> >> __________________________________________________
> >> >>
> >> > __________________________________________________
> >> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >> >
> >> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> >> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> > __________________________________________________
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >>
> >> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> >> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> __________________________________________________
> >>
> >__________________________________________________
> >To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> >For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> to
> >http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >__________________________________________________
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> >For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >__________________________________________________
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 16:08:08 -0500
> From: "KUHN, LELAND" <LKUHN at cnmc.org>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Hello!
> To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID:
>        <BAEF334992594C47AD272D6B69E6C3600234884F at EXCHVS02.cnmc.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"
>
>
> Matt,
>
> Welcome you lucky heir!  Heirship might not be a bad name for your boat.
> Hotheir and Heirhead sound kind of nautical too.
>
> You may have seen in the archives that we have quite a few Rhodes22
> owners in and around the Annapolis area.  Have you found a marina yet?
>
> Lee
> 1986 Rhodes22  AT EASE
> Kent Island, MD
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Porter
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 3:15 PM
> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Hello!
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm new to the list and wanted to introduce myself.  I'm the soon-to-be
> owner of a 1995/2002 Rhodes 22.  My uncle has decided that he'll get
> more
> enjoyment out of his Rhodes if he gives her to me, his (very lucky and
> appreciative) nephew who happens to live in Maryland with easy access to
> the
> Severn River and Chesapeake Bay.
>
> I've enjoyed reading through your list archives and getting an insider's
> perspective on the Rhodes 22.  My wife and I are still a bit in shock
> over
> the "inheritance;" my uncle (who would be the first to tell you that
> he's
> the king stupid purchases) seems to have picked the perfect boat.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Matt Porter
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>
> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
> for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
> unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
> e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 23:26:57 -0800
> From: "Geankoplis" <napoli68 at charter.net>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Positively positive flotation
> To: "'The Rhodes 22 Email List'" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID: <001201cac023$11b3e0f0$351ba2d0$@net>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"
>
> Lee,
>
>        You have nailed it, er uh, I mean uh.......
>
> Chris Da Greek G
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of KUHN, LELAND
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 06:13
> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Positively positive flotation
>
> Chris da Greek,
>
> How's this?  "...she rolled over like a cheap, well-Rhode oar."
>
> Lee
> 1986 Rhodes22  AT EASE
> Kent Island, MD
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of Geankoplis
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 9:44 PM
> To: 'The Rhodes 22 Email List'
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Positively positive flotation
>
> Hey Stan,
>        Don't forget my similar experience when my 1st Rhodes (76) was
> turned turtle and the mast driven into the mud.  All I did was pull the
> cleaves pins and tabernacle bolt and voila' she rolled over like a cheap
> uh,
> uh, I need another analogy here.  Anyway, It took two frantic guys with
> 5
> gallon buckets a very short time to have her pretty much empty of water.
> The boat with standard mast floated well above the gunnels as I remember
> so
> bailing wasn't a problem.
> Chris  da Greek G
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of stan
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 08:15
> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
>
> Thanks all for the feedback but I am still flying blind here because I
> am
> still missing the answer as to whether any of the 6 boats were
> completely
> submerged so that the deck top was under water.  I had asked that
> question
> to get an idea of water depth.  From what I am hearing, the Rhodes was
> never
>
> completely submerged.   Were any others?
>
> If so, that would indicate deep water and that since the Rhodes deck was
>
> still above water, the floatation had done its job.  If all boats had
> their
> decks above water that would indicate shallow depth and therefore no
> positive indication of successful floatation since the boats were
> sitting on
>
> the bottom, not able to go down far enough to get to the flotation
> level.
>
> I am interested in getting the hard facts because it is very expensive
> for
> us to conduct such tests and so we only did it once and those photos
> showed
> that the floatation took over when the water lever went just above the
> cockpit seat level.   We would be satisfied if the water level reaches
> the
> cabin roof before floatation is effective.  In the only report I recall
> hearing from an owner, attorney Paul Clevenger said that a rouge wave
> lifted
>
> his boat and put it back in the water upside down and it floated and
> they
> disconnected the mast and were able to right it.
>
> stan/gbi
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <mputnam1 at aol.com>
> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 10:30 AM
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
>
>
> >
> > My boat is at the Washington Sailing Marina and it did not go down.  I
>
> > asked the guys there about the storm-pushing-the-water-out theory, and
>
> > they assured me that did not happen. They report that all of the boats
>
> > that sank were overloaded with wet snow, began listing to one side,
> took
> > on water and went down.
> >
> > Mark P.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: R22RumRunner at aol.com
> > To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> > Sent: Mon, Mar 8, 2010 6:25 am
> > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >
> >
> > Stan,
> > 've been wondering about this ever since it was posted that the boats
> went
> > down. The only thing that makes sense to me is that this is a shallow
> > arina and  the storm pushed the water out, allowing the boats to reach
> the
> > ottom. Boats  without positive flotation didn't have a chance and
> probably
> > illed with water  as the water came back in. The Rhodes had the best
> > chance of
> > urvivability  because of the flotation. It was probably filled with
> water
> > nd mud, but still  floating as the water returned.
> > everal sailboats were laid over on Lake Hartwell when the water went
> down
> > aster than the owners could move them. When the water level came back
> up,
> > any  of these boats simply filled with water and laid on the bottom
> > waiting
> > or  someone to raise them. Attached is a photo of a San Juan 25 that
> was
> > aised  recently. It sat on the bottom for about nine months before the
>
> > owner
> > ad her  raised.
> >
> > ummy
> >
> >
> > n a message dated 3/7/2010 1:16:51 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> > tan at rhodes22.com writes:
> > Dave,
> > I have not had a clear picture of what  happened.   Were all boats
> > ompletely
> > nder water or were parts  of the decks (other than the masts) still
> above
> > ater  level?
> > stan/gbi
> >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> > ame: not available
> > ype: image/jpeg
> > ize: 1123147 bytes
> > esc: not available
> > rl :
> >
> http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20100308/d70
> 522b<http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20100308/d70%0A522b>
> f/attachment.jpeg
> > __________________________________________________
> > o subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> > to
> > ttp://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > _________________________________________________
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>
> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>
> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
> for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
> unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
> e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>
> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:08:04 -0500
> From: "Captainpy" <captainpy at verizon.net>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Tampa Bay
> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID: <F65DE5C95D1B447CBADE6B1CBA49D39F at Deena>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> If you have never been to Tampa bay, A nice quick stop is at beer can
> Island.  Phil and I had gone there on a Pontoon a couple years ago from Mc
> Dill Airbase.  There is a dock there you can pull up to.  It looks very
> similar To the one in the movie Castaway with Tom Hanks.  It is not very
> large and you can walk around its perimeter in about 15-20 mins.  I walked
> along the Beach a few feet out into the water and had some shrimp scurry
> across my toes.
>
> Deena
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of
> rhodes22-list-request at rhodes22.org
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 12:00 PM
> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> Subject: Rhodes22-list Digest, Vol 2146, Issue 1
>
> Send Rhodes22-list mailing list submissions to
>        rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        rhodes22-list-request at rhodes22.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        rhodes22-list-owner at rhodes22.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Rhodes22-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Washington Sailing Marina (John Lock)
>   2. Re: Diamond Board Depth (Bob Keller)
>   3. Re: Tampa Bay area mini cruise (Bob Keller)
>   4. Re: Diamond Board Depth (cowie)
>   5. Re: Diamond Board Depth (Leland)
>   6. Re: Diamond Board Depth (Rick)
>   7. Re: Submerged Rhodes (Rick)
>   8. Re: Tampa Bay area mini cruise (Mike Cheung)
>   9. Re: Diamond Board Depth (Mary Lou Troy)
>  10. Re: Positively positive flotation (Geankoplis)
>  11. Re: Rhodes22-list Digest, Vol 2145, Issue 1 (Eugene D McGee)
>  12. Re: Rhodes22-list Digest, Vol 2145, Issue 1 (stan)
>  13. Re: Positively positive flotation (KUHN, LELAND)
>  14. Re: Washington Sailing Marina (stan)
>  15. Re: Washington Sailing Marina (Hank)
>  16. Re: Washington Sailing Marina (Mary Lou Troy)
>  17. Re: Washington Sailing Marina (stan)
>  18. Re: Washington Sailing Marina (Hank)
>  19. Re: Diamond Board Depth (Rick)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 12:12:50 -0500
> From: John Lock <jlock at relevantarts.com>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID: <EF4FA90D-AA00-437D-91E2-7126B18CE699 at relevantarts.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> If I recall from the photos, she was over on the port side.  So not
> likely to be the sink drain, since that's on the starboard side (for
> most of us anyway) and would have been well above the waterline when
> listing to port.
>
> Cheers!
> John Lock
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> s/v Pandion - '79 Rhodes 22
> Lake Sinclair, GA
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
> On Mar 8, 2010, at 11:28, Mary Lou Troy wrote:
> > Thanks for the input Mark. Still surprised that a R22 would go so far
> > over but if the cockpit drains were blocked water could get into the
> > cabin. If it listed far enough water could come in through the sink
> > drain. The way the boat was tied may also have interfered with it's
> > ability to remain level or to recover.
> >
> > Thanks again,
> > Mary Lou
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:23:07 -0500
> From: Bob Keller <r22yankeeclipper at hotmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Diamond Board Depth
> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID: <SNT131-w28694B6880D13E66CFDAEBD1350 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> Looks to me as if it is all the way down.
>
> BK
>
> > Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 05:30:26 -0800
> > From: ccowie at cowieassociates.com
> > To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> > Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Diamond Board Depth
> >
> >
> > I took advantage of the warm weather this weekend and got my boat ready
> for
> > the spring launch. With my boat up on jacks I was able to lower the
> diamond
> > board all the way and took some measurements. I measure 24" from the keel
> > to the bottom of diamond board and also measure 4-3" to 4'-6" from the
> water
> > line to the bottom of the diamond board. My question is this: is my
> > diamond board all the way down at 24"? I think it is as this seems to
> > match photos on the GB web site but just want to make sure. The older
> style
> > center board seems to be deeper? Also if the water line to bottom of
> > diamond board is 4'-3" less 24" when the board is up then the draft is
> about
> > 2'-3" not 20" noted on the GB site? Does the advertised 20" asume a
> slight
> > heel? Enclosed are some images for reference.
> >
> > http://old.nabble.com/file/p27819957/illustration_02.jpg
> illustration_02.jpg
> >
> > Cowie
> > Opus 2009
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Diamond-Board-Depth-tp27819957p27819957.html
> > Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469229/direct/01/
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:30:35 -0500
> From: Bob Keller <r22yankeeclipper at hotmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Tampa Bay area mini cruise
> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID: <SNT131-w5E5B01D69D0D2CAF472A1D1350 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> Mike,
>
> Sounds like a good trip.  Please post your trip log when you return.  Not a
> real log, just what you did, where you sailed and how were the anchorages,
> marinas, restaurants, bars and beaches along the way.  We are considering
> going to the Tampa area for an R-22 trailersailing trip as it is only 5
> hours drive from us, but we always drive past there and go to Punta Gorda
> further south.  Let me know how it goes and how it is to sail around there.
>
> Thanks and good luck.
>
> Bob K
>
> > Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:08:47 -0800
> > From: mikecheung at att.net
> > To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> > Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Tampa Bay area mini cruise
> >
> >
> > My Admiral and I are bareboating a Beneteau 323 out of St Pete next week
> on a
> > 3 day / 2 night mini cruise. To make this Rhodes relevant, it was a close
> > call between bareboating and towing our Rhodes, s/v Muireann, down. And,
> in
> > more Rhodes relevance, our owning a 22' sailboat along with some ASA
> courses
> > completed before we got Muireann made bareboating easy. In the end,
> taking
> > our Mooney 231 down and bareboating won out over driving, this time. It
> was
> > close, but we're a little pressed for time so the 5 hour trip using the
> > Mooney won out over a probably 20 hour or more trip towing Muireann to
> FL.
>
> >
> > Anyway, our plans aren't firm yet, but the basic idea, assuming the
> weather
> > cooperates, is to visit Egmont Key day one, spend night one on the hook
> in
> > or near the Manatee River, and "play it be ear" for day two/ night two,
> > possibly returning to St Pete to hit the restaurants or spending another
> > night on the hook probably somewhere along the south side of Tampa Bay.
> >
> > Any "must see" or "must sail" stuff that we should be considering?
> >
> > Mike Cheung, s/v Muireann
> >
> > -----
> > Mike Cheung
> > s/v Muireann 1993/2008 Rhodes 22
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Tampa-Bay-area-mini-cruise-tp27823435p27823435.html
> > Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469230/direct/01/
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 14:41:56 -0800 (PST)
> From: cowie <ccowie at cowieassociates.com>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Diamond Board Depth
> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> Message-ID: <27828783.post at talk.nabble.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
>
> Bob:
>
> Thanks, I was hoping someone would tell me the board is only half way down
> and that by lowering it all the way I would improve my ability to point
> higher into the wind.  Suppose I just need to learn to adjust my sails
> better.  I seem to only be able to come to within about 50-60 degrees of
> the
> apparent wind when beating.  Enclosed is a trip I recorded last year on my
> iphone and then imported to cad in order to do a crude set of measurements.
> The average angle off the wind for the trip is about 54 degrees.  According
> to Wikipedia, see page two of the enclosed pdf file, that?s about average
> for a shallow draft boat.  At least it's better than 90 degrees for a
> square
> rigger; otherwise we would never get anywhere.
>
> http://old.nabble.com/file/p27828783/trip_01.pdf trip_01.pdf
>
>
> Bob Keller wrote:
> >
> >
> > Looks to me as if it is all the way down.
> >
> > BK
> >
> >> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 05:30:26 -0800
> >> From: ccowie at cowieassociates.com
> >> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> >> Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Diamond Board Depth
> >>
> >>
> >> I took advantage of the warm weather this weekend and got my boat ready
> >> for
> >> the spring launch. With my boat up on jacks I was able to lower the
> >> diamond
> >> board all the way and took some measurements. I measure 24" from the
> keel
> >> to the bottom of diamond board and also measure 4-3" to 4'-6" from the
> >> water
> >> line to the bottom of the diamond board. My question is this: is my
> >> diamond board all the way down at 24"? I think it is as this seems to
> >> match photos on the GB web site but just want to make sure. The older
> >> style
> >> center board seems to be deeper? Also if the water line to bottom of
> >> diamond board is 4'-3" less 24" when the board is up then the draft is
> >> about
> >> 2'-3" not 20" noted on the GB site? Does the advertised 20" asume a
> >> slight
> >> heel? Enclosed are some images for reference.
> >>
> >> http://old.nabble.com/file/p27819957/illustration_02.jpg
> >> illustration_02.jpg
> >>
> >> Cowie
> >> Opus 2009
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://old.nabble.com/Diamond-Board-Depth-tp27819957p27819957.html
> >> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >>
> >> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> >> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> __________________________________________________
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469229/direct/01/
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Diamond-Board-Depth-tp27819957p27828783.html
> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 15:33:20 -0800 (PST)
> From: Leland <LKUHN at cnmc.org>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Diamond Board Depth
> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> Message-ID: <27829335.post at talk.nabble.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
>
> Chris,
>
> Several years ago I measured 45 degrees in a 12 knot wind, serious chop,
> full main pulled tight with the traveler centered, board down, boom down,
> hands-free with the tiller locked.  The Genoa sheets were run across the
> cabin top between the inside shrouds and mast so the headsail was pulled
> tight to almost 100%.
>
> I'm certainly no expert but to get the Genoa tight enough for good pointing
> it seems like you need to run the sheets as close to the inside as
> possible.
>
> I frequently run them between the inside and outside shrouds across the
> deck
> and am guessing that I'm still not hitting 50 degrees into the wind.
>  Having
> the board down only helps until your sails start luffing.
>
> I'd love to hear some other opinions on this.  It wouldn't be the first
> time
> I've been wrong on my sailing advice. :)
>
> Lee
> 1986 Rhodes22  AT EASE
> Kent Island, MD
>
>
>
>
>
> cowie wrote:
> >
> > Bob:
> >
> > Thanks, I was hoping someone would tell me the board is only half way
> down
> > and that by lowering it all the way I would improve my ability to point
> > higher into the wind.  Suppose I just need to learn to adjust my sails
> > better.  I seem to only be able to come to within about 50-60 degrees of
> > the apparent wind when beating.  Enclosed is a trip I recorded last year
> > on my iphone and then imported to cad in order to do a crude set of
> > measurements.  The average angle off the wind for the trip is about 54
> > degrees.  According to Wikipedia, see page two of the enclosed pdf file,
> > that?s about average for a shallow draft boat.  At least it's better than
> > 90 degrees for a square rigger; otherwise we would never get anywhere.
> >
> >  http://old.nabble.com/file/p27828783/trip_01.pdf trip_01.pdf
> >
> >
> > Bob Keller wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Looks to me as if it is all the way down.
> >>
> >> BK
> >>
> >>> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 05:30:26 -0800
> >>> From: ccowie at cowieassociates.com
> >>> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> >>> Subject: [Rhodes22-list] Diamond Board Depth
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I took advantage of the warm weather this weekend and got my boat ready
> >>> for
> >>> the spring launch. With my boat up on jacks I was able to lower the
> >>> diamond
> >>> board all the way and took some measurements. I measure 24" from the
> >>> keel
> >>> to the bottom of diamond board and also measure 4-3" to 4'-6" from the
> >>> water
> >>> line to the bottom of the diamond board. My question is this: is my
> >>> diamond board all the way down at 24"? I think it is as this seems to
> >>> match photos on the GB web site but just want to make sure. The older
> >>> style
> >>> center board seems to be deeper? Also if the water line to bottom of
> >>> diamond board is 4'-3" less 24" when the board is up then the draft is
> >>> about
> >>> 2'-3" not 20" noted on the GB site? Does the advertised 20" asume a
> >>> slight
> >>> heel? Enclosed are some images for reference.
> >>>
> >>> http://old.nabble.com/file/p27819957/illustration_02.jpg
> >>> illustration_02.jpg
> >>>
> >>> Cowie
> >>> Opus 2009
> >>> --
> >>> View this message in context:
> >>> http://old.nabble.com/Diamond-Board-Depth-tp27819957p27819957.html
> >>> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>>
> >>> __________________________________________________
> >>> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >>>
> >>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> >>> go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>> __________________________________________________
> >>
> >> _________________________________________________________________
> >> Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
> >> http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469229/direct/01/
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >>
> >> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> >> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> __________________________________________________
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Diamond-Board-Depth-tp27819957p27829335.html
> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:45:56 -0500
> From: Rick <sloopblueheron at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Diamond Board Depth
> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID:
>        <52e9a141003081645s6652b977u350576bfa128340b at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Chris,
>
> I don't see your turning block.  Mine is always exposed when my boat is on
> the lift
> --handy for inspecting.  So unless the picture just doesn't show the block,
> I would say you need to move your stop knot a bit down the hauling line.
>
> Rick
>
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:30 AM, cowie <ccowie at cowieassociates.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > I took advantage of the warm weather this weekend and got my boat ready
> for
> > the spring launch.  With my boat up on jacks I was able to lower the
> > diamond
> > board all the way and took some measurements.  I measure 24" from the
> keel
> > to the bottom of diamond board and also measure 4-3" to 4'-6" from the
> > water
> > line to the bottom of the diamond board.  My question is this:  is my
> > diamond board all the way down at 24"?   I think it is as this seems to
> > match photos on the GB web site but just want to make sure.  The older
> > style
> > center board seems to be deeper?  Also if the water line to bottom of
> > diamond board is 4'-3" less 24" when the board is up then the draft is
> > about
> > 2'-3" not 20" noted on the GB site?  Does the advertised 20" asume a
> slight
> > heel?  Enclosed are some images for reference.
> >
> >
> http://old.nabble.com/file/p27819957/illustration_02.jpgillustration_02.jpg
> >
> > Cowie
> > Opus 2009
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://old.nabble.com/Diamond-Board-Depth-tp27819957p27819957.html
> > Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 20:16:44 -0500
> From: Rick <sloopblueheron at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Submerged Rhodes
> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID:
>        <52e9a141003081716q5fc40224s7c126767858a8b3d at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Derek,
>
> Sorry, I misread your question.  The blue is pretty pale.
>
> Rick
>
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Derek Dodson <ddodson at ebcc.com> wrote:
>
> > I understand about the Teflon and copper but I also want a dark blue
> > bottom. Right now my Rhodes is aqua green and that is not my choice of
> > color. I know you really can't see that much when it is in water but most
> of
> > time it is on trailer.
> >
> > Derek Dodson
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org [mailto:
> > rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of Rick
> > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 8:11 PM
> > To: The Rhodes 22 Email List
> >  Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Submerged Rhodes
> >
> > Derek,
> >
> > The color makes no difference.  Its all about the teflon and copper
> oxide.
> >
> > Rummy,
> >
> > I doubt there is anything worse than Lake Erie gunk.  It even includes
> > zebra
> > and quagire mussels.  With VC17, it just power washes off once a year.
> >
> > I know a guy who smuggles VC17 into Florida to paint his boat docked in
> > brackish water where ocean mussels grow.  (VC17 is not legal in every
> > state.)
> >
> > Rick
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Derek Dodson <ddodson at ebcc.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I have to do a bottom paint job on my Rhodes. Has anyone used the V17
> > blue
> > > and if so is it a dark blue or light blue?
> > >
> > > Derek
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org [mailto:
> > > rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of R22RumRunner at aol.com
> > > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 5:52 AM
> > > To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> > >  Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Submerged Rhodes
> > >
> > > Rick,
> > > I already have the best bottom paint for this lake, but as stated, Lake
> > > Hartwell slime is impervious to almost every brand available. I will
> > still
> > > need  to scrape the bottom (lightly) at least once a year.
> > >
> > > Rummy
> > >
> > >
> > > In a message dated 3/4/2010 8:14:44 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> > > sloopblueheron at gmail.com writes:
> > >
> > > Rummy,
> > >
> > > Save yourself the cost and aggrivation of a floating  dock and paint
> the
> > > bottom with VC17.
> > >
> > > Rick
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010  at 3:22 PM, <R22RumRunner at aol.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Stan,
> > > >  That's just one more reason for me to convince the admiral that we
> > need
> > > a
> > > > float for the R22 as well as her run about. The last time I checked,
> > >  they
> > > > ran  around $5,000.00 installed, but it sure would be nice  to get
> her
> > up
> > > > and
> > > > out of  the water. Even with bottom  paint, Lake Hartwell can leave a
> > > nasty
> > > > stripe around  the water  line.
> > > >
> > > > Rummy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > In a message dated  3/4/2010 3:05:30 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> > > >  stan at rhodes22.com  writes:
> > > >
> > > > your and  Rummy of course are correct - I think  that is a shallow
> > water
> > > way
> > > > and  might theorize that the snow  load was enough to push it down
> > enough
> > > to
> > > > bed  the keel in the  mud (the self bailers would have been clogged)
> > and
> > > > once
> > > > full  of water it did not take much resistance to keep it   down?
> > > >
> > > > ss
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > >  From: "Michael D.  Weisner" <mweisner at ebsmed.com>
> > > > To: "The  Rhodes 22 Email List"  <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > > > Sent:  Thursday, March 04, 2010 2:54  PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list]  Submerged Rhodes
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >  Stan,
> > > > >
> > > >  > I thought that ice floats on water?  If the ice  caused
> submersion,
> > > it
> > > > > would
> > > > > only be until it starts to  float  (hull might be under but not on
> > > > bottom.)
> > > >  >
> > > > > Mike
> > > > > s/v  Shanghai'd Summer ('81)
> > > >  > Nissequogue River, NY
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >  From:  "stan"  Thursday, March 04, 2010 2:05 PM
> > > > >> believe it -  I  think 6 went down and at least one was a Rhodes
> > > >  >>
> > > > >> the  weight of the ice was more than the  floatation could
>  handle.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ss
> > > >  >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> -----  Original Message  -----
> > > > >> From:  <R22RumRunner at aol.com>
> > > >  >> To:  <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > > > >> Sent:  Thursday, March 04, 2010  1:58 PM
> > > > >> Subject: Re:  [Rhodes22-list] Submerged  Rhodes
> > > > >>
> > > >  >>
> > > > >>> Marlan,
> > > > >>> I have   trouble believing that this is a Rhodes 22. R22's don't
> > > sink.
> > > >  >>>  They
> > > > >>> are built with positive   flotation.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>  Rummy
> > > >  >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> In a message  dated  3/3/2010 12:21:18 P.M. Eastern Standard
> Time,
> > > >  >>>  marlangreen at hotmail.com  writes:
> > > >  >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> This  was  sent  out through my sailing club. Washingotn Sailing
> > > Marina
> > > >  is
> > > > >>>  on
> > > > >>> the Virginia side of the  Potomac. I'm not sure if  this is a
> > Rhodes
> > > or
> > > > >>>  not.
> > > > >>> If it  is will  anyone out there save  it?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> See attached  document  for  photos
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>   Marlan
> > > > >>>  Message:
> > > > >>>
> > > >  >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Per  discussions  with  Washington Sailing Marina (WSM) there
> > > > >>>  is  still one boat down (see pic #1  and #2 on this page).  It
> may
> > > be
> > > >  a
> > > > >>> Rhodes
> > > > >>> 22? Of  recent vintage with   ballpark before storm values of 5k
> or
> > > 10k
> > > > or
> > > > >>>  even
> > > > >>>   20k.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > >  >>> At the  going rate of 20 per foot for diver salvage   the
> > > > >>>  insurance company may be looking at the cost of  salvaging for 4
> > or
> > > 5k
> > > > a
> > > > >>> boat
> > > > >>>  which may only now be worth much  less.
> > > > >>> This may be  an opportunity  for a SCOW member to  make an offer
> on
> > > this
> > > >  >>> boat.  Per WSM a sealed   letter could be
> > > >  >>> mailed to the slip holder.  It may  say
> > > >  >>> something  akin to ? ?I?m willing to pay _____   (amount) for
> this
> > > boat?
> > > > .
> > > > >>> Note also  that  slip fees are  due on this slip
> > > > >>> on April 1st,   2010.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > >  >>>  Hotmail:  Trusted email with powerful SPAM    protection.
> > > > >>>   http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469227/direct/01/
> > > > >>>   __________________________________________________
> > > > >>>  To   subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > > > >>>   http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > > >  >>>
> > > > >>>  For the list  Charter and help  with using the mailing list and
> > > > archives
> > > > >>>  go
> > > > >>> to   http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > >  >>>  __________________________________________________
> > > >  >>>  __________________________________________________
> > > >  >>> To  subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > > > >>>   http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > > >  >>>
> > > > >>>  For the list Charter and help with  using the mailing list and
> > > archives
> > > >
> > > > >>> go
> > > >  >>> to  http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > >>>   __________________________________________________
> > > >  >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>   __________________________________________________
> > > > >> To   subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > > > >>   http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > > >  >>
> > > > >>  For the list Charter and help with using the  mailing list and
> > > archives
> > > > go
> > > > >> to  http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > >>   __________________________________________________
> > > > >>
> > > >  >
> > > > >   __________________________________________________
> > > > > To   subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > > > >   http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > > > >
> > > >  > For the  list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> > > archives
> > > > go
> > > > > to  http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > >  >  __________________________________________________
> > > >  >
> > > >
> > > >  __________________________________________________
> > > > To   subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > > >  http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > > >
> > > > For the  list  Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> > archives
> > > go
> > > > to  http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > >  __________________________________________________
> > > >  __________________________________________________
> > > > To  subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > > >  http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > > >
> > > > For the  list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> archives
> > > go
> > > > to  http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > >  __________________________________________________
> > > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > To  subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >
> > > For the list  Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> > go
> > > to  http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >
> > > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> > > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > __________________________________________________
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >
> > > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> > > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > __________________________________________________
> > >
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 17:29:38 -0800 (PST)
> From: Mike Cheung <mikecheung at att.net>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Tampa Bay area mini cruise
> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> Message-ID: <27830223.post at talk.nabble.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> Bob ... will do.  And as much as we're looking forward to having the 323 to
> play with; I envy you the opportunity to ply those waters in an R22.
> Judging from some of the sounding's, you'll have less to "sweat" than we
> will with the 323 as we pick our way into the anchorage behind De Soto
> point.  Not to worry, we'll get Muireann down there sooner or later; our
> son
> is at USF for the next few years.  If we had three more days, we'd be
> towing
> Muireann down there for sure, but we're a little jammed up for time and the
> Mooney is whispering "choose me".
>
> Mike
>
>
> Bob Keller wrote:
> >
> >
> > Mike,
> >
> > Sounds like a good trip.  Please post your trip log when you return.  Not
> > a real log, just what you did, where you sailed and how were the
> > anchorages, marinas, restaurants, bars and beaches along the way.  We are
> > considering going to the Tampa area for an R-22 trailersailing trip as it
> > is only 5 hours drive from us, but we always drive past there and go to
> > Punta Gorda further south.  Let me know how it goes and how it is to sail
> > around there.
> >
> > Thanks and good luck.
> >
> > Bob K
> >
> > _
> >
> >
>
>
> -----
> Mike Cheung
> s/v Muireann 1993/2008 Rhodes 22
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Tampa-Bay-area-mini-cruise-tp27823435p27830223.html
> Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:11:47 -0500
> From: Mary Lou Troy <mtroy at atlanticbb.net>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Diamond Board Depth
> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID: <B9.46.21991.E6EA59B4 at BL-106>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
> What turning block? Is it on the board itself? I know there are a lot
> variations. Ours is a direct lift. No blocks.
>
> Mary Lou
>
> At 07:45 PM 3/8/2010, you wrote:
> >Chris,
> >
> >I don't see your turning block.  Mine is always exposed when my boat is on
> >the lift
> >--handy for inspecting.  So unless the picture just doesn't show the
> block,
> >I would say you need to move your stop knot a bit down the hauling line.
> >
> >Rick
> >
> >On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:30 AM, cowie <ccowie at cowieassociates.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I took advantage of the warm weather this weekend and got my boat ready
> for
> > > the spring launch.  With my boat up on jacks I was able to lower the
> > > diamond
> > > board all the way and took some measurements.  I measure 24" from the
> keel
> > > to the bottom of diamond board and also measure 4-3" to 4'-6" from the
> > > water
> > > line to the bottom of the diamond board.  My question is this:  is my
> > > diamond board all the way down at 24"?   I think it is as this seems to
> > > match photos on the GB web site but just want to make sure.  The older
> > > style
> > > center board seems to be deeper?  Also if the water line to bottom of
> > > diamond board is 4'-3" less 24" when the board is up then the draft is
> > > about
> > > 2'-3" not 20" noted on the GB site?  Does the advertised 20" asume a
> slight
> > > heel?  Enclosed are some images for reference.
> > >
> > >
> http://old.nabble.com/file/p27819957/illustration_02.jpgillustration_02.jpg
> > >
> > > Cowie
> > > Opus 2009
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> > > http://old.nabble.com/Diamond-Board-Depth-tp27819957p27819957.html
> > > Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >
> > > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> > > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > __________________________________________________
> > >
> >__________________________________________________
> >To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> >For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> >archives go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >__________________________________________________
> >
> >No virus found in this incoming message.
> >Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> >Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2730 - Release Date:
> >03/08/10 02:34:00
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 18:44:01 -0800
> From: "Geankoplis" <napoli68 at charter.net>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Positively positive flotation
> To: "'The Rhodes 22 Email List'" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID: <000001cabf32$60f8f980$22eaec80$@net>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hey Stan,
>        Don't forget my similar experience when my 1st Rhodes (76) was
> turned turtle and the mast driven into the mud.  All I did was pull the
> cleaves pins and tabernacle bolt and voila' she rolled over like a cheap
> uh,
> uh, I need another analogy here.  Anyway, It took two frantic guys with 5
> gallon buckets a very short time to have her pretty much empty of water.
> The boat with standard mast floated well above the gunnels as I remember so
> bailing wasn't a problem.
> Chris  da Greek G
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of stan
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 08:15
> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
>
> Thanks all for the feedback but I am still flying blind here because I am
> still missing the answer as to whether any of the 6 boats were completely
> submerged so that the deck top was under water.  I had asked that question
> to get an idea of water depth.  From what I am hearing, the Rhodes was
> never
>
> completely submerged.   Were any others?
>
> If so, that would indicate deep water and that since the Rhodes deck was
> still above water, the floatation had done its job.  If all boats had their
> decks above water that would indicate shallow depth and therefore no
> positive indication of successful floatation since the boats were sitting
> on
>
> the bottom, not able to go down far enough to get to the flotation level.
>
> I am interested in getting the hard facts because it is very expensive for
> us to conduct such tests and so we only did it once and those photos showed
> that the floatation took over when the water lever went just above the
> cockpit seat level.   We would be satisfied if the water level reaches the
> cabin roof before floatation is effective.  In the only report I recall
> hearing from an owner, attorney Paul Clevenger said that a rouge wave
> lifted
>
> his boat and put it back in the water upside down and it floated and they
> disconnected the mast and were able to right it.
>
> stan/gbi
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <mputnam1 at aol.com>
> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 10:30 AM
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
>
>
> >
> > My boat is at the Washington Sailing Marina and it did not go down.  I
> > asked the guys there about the storm-pushing-the-water-out theory, and
> > they assured me that did not happen. They report that all of the boats
> > that sank were overloaded with wet snow, began listing to one side, took
> > on water and went down.
> >
> > Mark P.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: R22RumRunner at aol.com
> > To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> > Sent: Mon, Mar 8, 2010 6:25 am
> > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >
> >
> > Stan,
> > 've been wondering about this ever since it was posted that the boats
> went
> > down. The only thing that makes sense to me is that this is a shallow
> > arina and  the storm pushed the water out, allowing the boats to reach
> the
> > ottom. Boats  without positive flotation didn't have a chance and
> probably
> > illed with water  as the water came back in. The Rhodes had the best
> > chance of
> > urvivability  because of the flotation. It was probably filled with water
> > nd mud, but still  floating as the water returned.
> > everal sailboats were laid over on Lake Hartwell when the water went down
> > aster than the owners could move them. When the water level came back up,
> > any  of these boats simply filled with water and laid on the bottom
> > waiting
> > or  someone to raise them. Attached is a photo of a San Juan 25 that was
> > aised  recently. It sat on the bottom for about nine months before the
> > owner
> > ad her  raised.
> >
> > ummy
> >
> >
> > n a message dated 3/7/2010 1:16:51 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> > tan at rhodes22.com writes:
> > Dave,
> > I have not had a clear picture of what  happened.   Were all boats
> > ompletely
> > nder water or were parts  of the decks (other than the masts) still above
> > ater  level?
> > stan/gbi
> >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> > ame: not available
> > ype: image/jpeg
> > ize: 1123147 bytes
> > esc: not available
> > rl :
> >
>
> http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20100308/d70522b
> f/attachment.jpeg<http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20100308/d70522b%0Af/attachment.jpeg>
> > __________________________________________________
> > o subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> > to
> > ttp://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > _________________________________________________
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>
> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 06:10:58 -0500
> From: "Eugene D McGee" <edavemcgee at cox.net>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Rhodes22-list Digest, Vol 2145, Issue 1
> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Cc: 'stan' <stan at rhodes22.com>
> Message-ID: <1F673E6FB1FD44AB9E6F0DD291C30DC2 at D4GNX321>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"
>
>
>
> Stan:
>
> I stopped by the marina on Saturday to see the Rhodes but she was already
> up
> so do not know. I bet you that they got her away from the dock, tugged her
> upright and pumped her out.
>
> Dave M.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 13:16:30 -0500
> From: "stan" <stan at rhodes22.com>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID: <82D8FCD4C9DB4273A2C81E87A3DE9EE8 at rhodes>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
>        reply-type=original
>
> Dave,
>
> I have not had a clear picture of what happened.   Were all boats
> completely
>
> under water or were parts of the decks (other than the masts) still above
> water level?
>
> stan/gbi
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 09:45:50 -0500
> From: "stan" <stan at rhodes22.com>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Rhodes22-list Digest, Vol 2145, Issue 1
> To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID: <EC7673F052C6489A80B81120982399D3 at rhodes>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
>        reply-type=original
>
> thanks but I have given up on my analysis since after three tries I can
> still not get an answer to water depth with my question of whether any of
> the 6 boats were under water.
>
> ss
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eugene D McGee" <edavemcgee at cox.net>
> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Cc: "'stan'" <stan at rhodes22.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 6:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Rhodes22-list Digest, Vol 2145, Issue 1
>
>
> >
> >
> > Stan:
> >
> > I stopped by the marina on Saturday to see the Rhodes but she was already
> > up
> > so do not know. I bet you that they got her away from the dock, tugged
> her
> > upright and pumped her out.
> >
> > Dave M.
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 13:16:30 -0500
> > From: "stan" <stan at rhodes22.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> > To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > Message-ID: <82D8FCD4C9DB4273A2C81E87A3DE9EE8 at rhodes>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> > reply-type=original
> >
> > Dave,
> >
> > I have not had a clear picture of what happened.   Were all boats
> > completely
> >
> > under water or were parts of the decks (other than the masts) still above
> > water level?
> >
> > stan/gbi
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 09:12:43 -0500
> From: "KUHN, LELAND" <LKUHN at cnmc.org>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Positively positive flotation
> To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID:
>        <BAEF334992594C47AD272D6B69E6C360023487B7 at EXCHVS02.cnmc.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"
>
> Chris da Greek,
>
> How's this?  "...she rolled over like a cheap, well-Rhode oar."
>
> Lee
> 1986 Rhodes22  AT EASE
> Kent Island, MD
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of Geankoplis
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 9:44 PM
> To: 'The Rhodes 22 Email List'
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Positively positive flotation
>
> Hey Stan,
>        Don't forget my similar experience when my 1st Rhodes (76) was
> turned turtle and the mast driven into the mud.  All I did was pull the
> cleaves pins and tabernacle bolt and voila' she rolled over like a cheap
> uh,
> uh, I need another analogy here.  Anyway, It took two frantic guys with
> 5
> gallon buckets a very short time to have her pretty much empty of water.
> The boat with standard mast floated well above the gunnels as I remember
> so
> bailing wasn't a problem.
> Chris  da Greek G
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of stan
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 08:15
> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
>
> Thanks all for the feedback but I am still flying blind here because I
> am
> still missing the answer as to whether any of the 6 boats were
> completely
> submerged so that the deck top was under water.  I had asked that
> question
> to get an idea of water depth.  From what I am hearing, the Rhodes was
> never
>
> completely submerged.   Were any others?
>
> If so, that would indicate deep water and that since the Rhodes deck was
>
> still above water, the floatation had done its job.  If all boats had
> their
> decks above water that would indicate shallow depth and therefore no
> positive indication of successful floatation since the boats were
> sitting on
>
> the bottom, not able to go down far enough to get to the flotation
> level.
>
> I am interested in getting the hard facts because it is very expensive
> for
> us to conduct such tests and so we only did it once and those photos
> showed
> that the floatation took over when the water lever went just above the
> cockpit seat level.   We would be satisfied if the water level reaches
> the
> cabin roof before floatation is effective.  In the only report I recall
> hearing from an owner, attorney Paul Clevenger said that a rouge wave
> lifted
>
> his boat and put it back in the water upside down and it floated and
> they
> disconnected the mast and were able to right it.
>
> stan/gbi
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <mputnam1 at aol.com>
> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 10:30 AM
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
>
>
> >
> > My boat is at the Washington Sailing Marina and it did not go down.  I
>
> > asked the guys there about the storm-pushing-the-water-out theory, and
>
> > they assured me that did not happen. They report that all of the boats
>
> > that sank were overloaded with wet snow, began listing to one side,
> took
> > on water and went down.
> >
> > Mark P.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: R22RumRunner at aol.com
> > To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> > Sent: Mon, Mar 8, 2010 6:25 am
> > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >
> >
> > Stan,
> > 've been wondering about this ever since it was posted that the boats
> went
> > down. The only thing that makes sense to me is that this is a shallow
> > arina and  the storm pushed the water out, allowing the boats to reach
> the
> > ottom. Boats  without positive flotation didn't have a chance and
> probably
> > illed with water  as the water came back in. The Rhodes had the best
> > chance of
> > urvivability  because of the flotation. It was probably filled with
> water
> > nd mud, but still  floating as the water returned.
> > everal sailboats were laid over on Lake Hartwell when the water went
> down
> > aster than the owners could move them. When the water level came back
> up,
> > any  of these boats simply filled with water and laid on the bottom
> > waiting
> > or  someone to raise them. Attached is a photo of a San Juan 25 that
> was
> > aised  recently. It sat on the bottom for about nine months before the
>
> > owner
> > ad her  raised.
> >
> > ummy
> >
> >
> > n a message dated 3/7/2010 1:16:51 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> > tan at rhodes22.com writes:
> > Dave,
> > I have not had a clear picture of what  happened.   Were all boats
> > ompletely
> > nder water or were parts  of the decks (other than the masts) still
> above
> > ater  level?
> > stan/gbi
> >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> > ame: not available
> > ype: image/jpeg
> > ize: 1123147 bytes
> > esc: not available
> > rl :
> >
> http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20100308/d70
> 522b<http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20100308/d70%0A522b>
> f/attachment.jpeg
> > __________________________________________________
> > o subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> > to
> > ttp://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > _________________________________________________
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>
> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
> __________________________________________________
> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>
> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> __________________________________________________
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
> for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
> unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
> e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:31:31 -0500
> From: "stan" <stan at rhodes22.com>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID: <4A82ED3C4A634DE6841E584F4E736B90 at rhodes>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
>        reply-type=original
>
> thanks CC - but with no indication of water depth I still can't tell if the
> boat is sitting on the bottom or if the floatation has succeeded in keeping
> the boat afloat even with all that flooding.
>
> ss
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "cowie" <ccowie at cowieassociates.com>
> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
>
>
> >
> > Stan:
> >
> > I previoulsy posted a pdf file that includes two photos of the Rhodes 22
> > at
> > the Washingtong Sailing Marina and she is not submerged rather flooded
> > with
> > water.   I will try to post the pdf file again.
> >
> > http://old.nabble.com/file/p27823731/r22WSM.pdf r22WSM.pdf
> >
> > Cowie
> > R22 2009 Opus
> >
> >
> > stanleyl wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks all for the feedback but I am still flying blind here because I
> am
> >> still missing the answer as to whether any of the 6 boats were
> completely
> >> submerged so that the deck top was under water.  I had asked that
> >> question
> >> to get an idea of water depth.  From what I am hearing, the Rhodes was
> >> never
> >> completely submerged.   Were any others?
> >>
> >> If so, that would indicate deep water and that since the Rhodes deck was
> >> still above water, the floatation had done its job.  If all boats had
> >> their
> >> decks above water that would indicate shallow depth and therefore no
> >> positive indication of successful floatation since the boats were
> sitting
> >> on
> >> the bottom, not able to go down far enough to get to the flotation
> level.
> >>
> >> I am interested in getting the hard facts because it is very expensive
> >> for
> >> us to conduct such tests and so we only did it once and those photos
> >> showed
> >> that the floatation took over when the water lever went just above the
> >> cockpit seat level.   We would be satisfied if the water level reaches
> >> the
> >> cabin roof before floatation is effective.  In the only report I recall
> >> hearing from an owner, attorney Paul Clevenger said that a rouge wave
> >> lifted
> >> his boat and put it back in the water upside down and it floated and
> they
> >> disconnected the mast and were able to right it.
> >>
> >> stan/gbi
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: <mputnam1 at aol.com>
> >> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 10:30 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> My boat is at the Washington Sailing Marina and it did not go down.  I
> >>> asked the guys there about the storm-pushing-the-water-out theory, and
> >>> they assured me that did not happen. They report that all of the boats
> >>> that sank were overloaded with wet snow, began listing to one side,
> took
> >>> on water and went down.
> >>>
> >>> Mark P.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: R22RumRunner at aol.com
> >>> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> >>> Sent: Mon, Mar 8, 2010 6:25 am
> >>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Stan,
> >>> 've been wondering about this ever since it was posted that the boats
> >>> went
> >>> down. The only thing that makes sense to me is that this is a shallow
> >>> arina and  the storm pushed the water out, allowing the boats to reach
> >>> the
> >>> ottom. Boats  without positive flotation didn't have a chance and
> >>> probably
> >>> illed with water  as the water came back in. The Rhodes had the best
> >>> chance of
> >>> urvivability  because of the flotation. It was probably filled with
> >>> water
> >>> nd mud, but still  floating as the water returned.
> >>> everal sailboats were laid over on Lake Hartwell when the water went
> >>> down
> >>> aster than the owners could move them. When the water level came back
> >>> up,
> >>> any  of these boats simply filled with water and laid on the bottom
> >>> waiting
> >>> or  someone to raise them. Attached is a photo of a San Juan 25 that
> was
> >>> aised  recently. It sat on the bottom for about nine months before the
> >>> owner
> >>> ad her  raised.
> >>>
> >>> ummy
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> n a message dated 3/7/2010 1:16:51 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> >>> tan at rhodes22.com writes:
> >>> Dave,
> >>> I have not had a clear picture of what  happened.   Were all boats
> >>> ompletely
> >>> nder water or were parts  of the decks (other than the masts) still
> >>> above
> >>> ater  level?
> >>> stan/gbi
> >>>
> >>> -------------- next part --------------
> >>> non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> >>> ame: not available
> >>> ype: image/jpeg
> >>> ize: 1123147 bytes
> >>> esc: not available
> >>> rl :
> >>>
>
> http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20100308/d70522b
> f/attachment.jpeg<http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20100308/d70522b%0Af/attachment.jpeg>
> >>> __________________________________________________
> >>> o subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> >>> go
> >>> to
> >>> ttp://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>> _________________________________________________
> >>>
> >>> __________________________________________________
> >>> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >>>
> >>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> >>> go
> >>> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>> __________________________________________________
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >>
> >> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> >> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> __________________________________________________
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://old.nabble.com/Washington-Sailing-Marina-tp27816104p27823731.html
> > Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:44:45 -0500
> From: Hank <hnw555 at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID:
>        <c319c8b51003090744n4f03906ap9e154c5f4b9ec308 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Stan,
>
> I think Mark did answer your question.
>
> My boat is at the Washington Sailing Marina and it did not go down.  I
> asked
> the guys there about the storm-pushing-the-water-out theory, and they
> assured me that did not happen. They report that all of the boats that sank
> were overloaded with wet snow, began listing to one side, took on water and
> went down.
>
> Mark P.
>
> I couldn't find the photos on your website of the flotation test.  Did you
> do it with the mast installed?  Was it an IMF with Sail?  From the photo of
> the boat at WSM it looks like after she took on water and flooded the
> cockpit, the weight of the mast cause a 90 degree roll.  I suspect that
> they
> righted her and were then able to bail/pump her out.
>
> Hank
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:31 AM, stan <stan at rhodes22.com> wrote:
>
> > thanks CC - but with no indication of water depth I still can't tell if
> the
> > boat is sitting on the bottom or if the floatation has succeeded in
> keeping
> > the boat afloat even with all that flooding.
> >
> > ss
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "cowie" <ccowie at cowieassociates.com>
> > To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >  Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:29 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Stan:
> > >
> > > I previoulsy posted a pdf file that includes two photos of the Rhodes
> 22
> > > at
> > > the Washingtong Sailing Marina and she is not submerged rather flooded
> > > with
> > > water.   I will try to post the pdf file again.
> > >
> > > http://old.nabble.com/file/p27823731/r22WSM.pdf r22WSM.pdf
> > >
> > > Cowie
> > > R22 2009 Opus
> > >
> > >
> > > stanleyl wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Thanks all for the feedback but I am still flying blind here because I
> > am
> > >> still missing the answer as to whether any of the 6 boats were
> > completely
> > >> submerged so that the deck top was under water.  I had asked that
> > >> question
> > >> to get an idea of water depth.  From what I am hearing, the Rhodes was
> > >> never
> > >> completely submerged.   Were any others?
> > >>
> > >> If so, that would indicate deep water and that since the Rhodes deck
> was
> > >> still above water, the floatation had done its job.  If all boats had
> > >> their
> > >> decks above water that would indicate shallow depth and therefore no
> > >> positive indication of successful floatation since the boats were
> > sitting
> > >> on
> > >> the bottom, not able to go down far enough to get to the flotation
> > level.
> > >>
> > >> I am interested in getting the hard facts because it is very expensive
> > >> for
> > >> us to conduct such tests and so we only did it once and those photos
> > >> showed
> > >> that the floatation took over when the water lever went just above the
> > >> cockpit seat level.   We would be satisfied if the water level reaches
> > >> the
> > >> cabin roof before floatation is effective.  In the only report I
> recall
> > >> hearing from an owner, attorney Paul Clevenger said that a rouge wave
> > >> lifted
> > >> his boat and put it back in the water upside down and it floated and
> > they
> > >> disconnected the mast and were able to right it.
> > >>
> > >> stan/gbi
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: <mputnam1 at aol.com>
> > >> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > >> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 10:30 AM
> > >> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> My boat is at the Washington Sailing Marina and it did not go down.
>  I
> > >>> asked the guys there about the storm-pushing-the-water-out theory,
> and
> > >>> they assured me that did not happen. They report that all of the
> boats
> > >>> that sank were overloaded with wet snow, began listing to one side,
> > took
> > >>> on water and went down.
> > >>>
> > >>> Mark P.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: R22RumRunner at aol.com
> > >>> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> > >>> Sent: Mon, Mar 8, 2010 6:25 am
> > >>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Stan,
> > >>> 've been wondering about this ever since it was posted that the boats
> > >>> went
> > >>> down. The only thing that makes sense to me is that this is a shallow
> > >>> arina and  the storm pushed the water out, allowing the boats to
> reach
> > >>> the
> > >>> ottom. Boats  without positive flotation didn't have a chance and
> > >>> probably
> > >>> illed with water  as the water came back in. The Rhodes had the best
> > >>> chance of
> > >>> urvivability  because of the flotation. It was probably filled with
> > >>> water
> > >>> nd mud, but still  floating as the water returned.
> > >>> everal sailboats were laid over on Lake Hartwell when the water went
> > >>> down
> > >>> aster than the owners could move them. When the water level came back
> > >>> up,
> > >>> any  of these boats simply filled with water and laid on the bottom
> > >>> waiting
> > >>> or  someone to raise them. Attached is a photo of a San Juan 25 that
> > was
> > >>> aised  recently. It sat on the bottom for about nine months before
> the
> > >>> owner
> > >>> ad her  raised.
> > >>>
> > >>> ummy
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> n a message dated 3/7/2010 1:16:51 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> > >>> tan at rhodes22.com writes:
> > >>> Dave,
> > >>> I have not had a clear picture of what  happened.   Were all boats
> > >>> ompletely
> > >>> nder water or were parts  of the decks (other than the masts) still
> > >>> above
> > >>> ater  level?
> > >>> stan/gbi
> > >>>
> > >>> -------------- next part --------------
> > >>> non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> > >>> ame: not available
> > >>> ype: image/jpeg
> > >>> ize: 1123147 bytes
> > >>> esc: not available
> > >>> rl :
> > >>>
> >
>
> http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20100308/d70522b
> f/attachment.jpeg<http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20100308/d70522b%0Af/attachment.jpeg>
> > >>> __________________________________________________
> > >>> o subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > >>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> archives
> > >>> go
> > >>> to
> > >>> ttp://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >>> _________________________________________________
> > >>>
> > >>> __________________________________________________
> > >>> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > >>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >>>
> > >>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> archives
> > >>> go
> > >>> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >>> __________________________________________________
> > >>
> > >> __________________________________________________
> > >> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > >> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >>
> > >> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> > go
> > >> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >> __________________________________________________
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> > >
> http://old.nabble.com/Washington-Sailing-Marina-tp27816104p27823731.html
> > > Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >
> > > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> > > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > __________________________________________________
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:57:35 -0500
> From: Mary Lou Troy <mtroy at atlanticbb.net>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID: <8F.C5.07076.5FF669B4 at BL-206>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
> Assuming this is the right marina, you could always call them. If you
> can talk to the manager or dockmaster, I'm sure she or she will know
> what slip the R22 was in and what the depth is at that slip.
>
> Washington Sailing Marina
> www.washingtonsailingmarina.com
> 1 Marina Drive
> Alexandria, VA 22314-1143
> (703) 548-9027
>
>
> Mary Lou
>
>
>
>
> At 10:31 AM 3/9/2010, you wrote:
> >thanks CC - but with no indication of water depth I still can't tell if
> the
> >boat is sitting on the bottom or if the floatation has succeeded in
> keeping
> >the boat afloat even with all that flooding.
> >
> >ss
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "cowie" <ccowie at cowieassociates.com>
> >To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:29 AM
> >Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Stan:
> > >
> > > I previoulsy posted a pdf file that includes two photos of the Rhodes
> 22
> > > at
> > > the Washingtong Sailing Marina and she is not submerged rather flooded
> > > with
> > > water.   I will try to post the pdf file again.
> > >
> > > http://old.nabble.com/file/p27823731/r22WSM.pdf r22WSM.pdf
> > >
> > > Cowie
> > > R22 2009 Opus
> > >
> > >
> > > stanleyl wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Thanks all for the feedback but I am still flying blind here because I
> am
> > >> still missing the answer as to whether any of the 6 boats were
> completely
> > >> submerged so that the deck top was under water.  I had asked that
> > >> question
> > >> to get an idea of water depth.  From what I am hearing, the Rhodes was
> > >> never
> > >> completely submerged.   Were any others?
> > >>
> > >> If so, that would indicate deep water and that since the Rhodes deck
> was
> > >> still above water, the floatation had done its job.  If all boats had
> > >> their
> > >> decks above water that would indicate shallow depth and therefore no
> > >> positive indication of successful floatation since the boats were
> sitting
> > >> on
> > >> the bottom, not able to go down far enough to get to the flotation
> level.
> > >>
> > >> I am interested in getting the hard facts because it is very expensive
> > >> for
> > >> us to conduct such tests and so we only did it once and those photos
> > >> showed
> > >> that the floatation took over when the water lever went just above the
> > >> cockpit seat level.   We would be satisfied if the water level reaches
> > >> the
> > >> cabin roof before floatation is effective.  In the only report I
> recall
> > >> hearing from an owner, attorney Paul Clevenger said that a rouge wave
> > >> lifted
> > >> his boat and put it back in the water upside down and it floated and
> they
> > >> disconnected the mast and were able to right it.
> > >>
> > >> stan/gbi
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: <mputnam1 at aol.com>
> > >> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > >> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 10:30 AM
> > >> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> My boat is at the Washington Sailing Marina and it did not go down.
>  I
> > >>> asked the guys there about the storm-pushing-the-water-out theory,
> and
> > >>> they assured me that did not happen. They report that all of the
> boats
> > >>> that sank were overloaded with wet snow, began listing to one side,
> took
> > >>> on water and went down.
> > >>>
> > >>> Mark P.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: R22RumRunner at aol.com
> > >>> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> > >>> Sent: Mon, Mar 8, 2010 6:25 am
> > >>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Stan,
> > >>> 've been wondering about this ever since it was posted that the boats
> > >>> went
> > >>> down. The only thing that makes sense to me is that this is a shallow
> > >>> arina and  the storm pushed the water out, allowing the boats to
> reach
> > >>> the
> > >>> ottom. Boats  without positive flotation didn't have a chance and
> > >>> probably
> > >>> illed with water  as the water came back in. The Rhodes had the best
> > >>> chance of
> > >>> urvivability  because of the flotation. It was probably filled with
> > >>> water
> > >>> nd mud, but still  floating as the water returned.
> > >>> everal sailboats were laid over on Lake Hartwell when the water went
> > >>> down
> > >>> aster than the owners could move them. When the water level came back
> > >>> up,
> > >>> any  of these boats simply filled with water and laid on the bottom
> > >>> waiting
> > >>> or  someone to raise them. Attached is a photo of a San Juan 25 that
> was
> > >>> aised  recently. It sat on the bottom for about nine months before
> the
> > >>> owner
> > >>> ad her  raised.
> > >>>
> > >>> ummy
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> n a message dated 3/7/2010 1:16:51 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> > >>> tan at rhodes22.com writes:
> > >>> Dave,
> > >>> I have not had a clear picture of what  happened.   Were all boats
> > >>> ompletely
> > >>> nder water or were parts  of the decks (other than the masts) still
> > >>> above
> > >>> ater  level?
> > >>> stan/gbi
> > >>>
> > >>> -------------- next part --------------
> > >>> non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> > >>> ame: not available
> > >>> ype: image/jpeg
> > >>> ize: 1123147 bytes
> > >>> esc: not available
> > >>> rl :
> > >>>
> >
>
> http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20100308/d70522b
> f/attachment.jpeg<http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20100308/d70522b%0Af/attachment.jpeg>
> > >>> __________________________________________________
> > >>> o subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > >>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> archives
> > >>> go
> > >>> to
> > >>> ttp://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >>> _________________________________________________
> > >>>
> > >>> __________________________________________________
> > >>> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > >>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >>>
> > >>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> archives
> > >>> go
> > >>> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >>> __________________________________________________
> > >>
> > >> __________________________________________________
> > >> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > >> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >>
> > >> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> > >> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >> __________________________________________________
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> > >
> http://old.nabble.com/Washington-Sailing-Marina-tp27816104p27823731.html
> > > Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >
> > > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> > > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > __________________________________________________
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> >For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> >archives go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >__________________________________________________
> >
> >No virus found in this incoming message.
> >Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> >Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2732 - Release Date:
> >03/09/10 02:33:00
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:01:27 -0500
> From: "stan" <stan at rhodes22.com>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID: <7A00C24AA5204139B2DF200D0FAF8F1F at rhodes>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
>        reply-type=original
>
> I feel like Judge Judy - no one is answering my question of whether the
> water at those slips is deep enough so that a down boat would be under
> water.  ( I never asked and had no interest in the water in and out
> theory).
>
> I thought it was a simple question that would establish if a boat went down
> no further because it was sitting on the bottom or it went down no further
> because it was being supported at that level by floatation.
>
> ss
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hank" <hnw555 at gmail.com>
> To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 10:44 AM
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
>
>
> > Stan,
> >
> > I think Mark did answer your question.
> >
> > My boat is at the Washington Sailing Marina and it did not go down.  I
> > asked
> > the guys there about the storm-pushing-the-water-out theory, and they
> > assured me that did not happen. They report that all of the boats that
> > sank
> > were overloaded with wet snow, began listing to one side, took on water
> > and
> > went down.
> >
> > Mark P.
> >
> > I couldn't find the photos on your website of the flotation test.  Did
> you
> > do it with the mast installed?  Was it an IMF with Sail?  From the photo
> > of
> > the boat at WSM it looks like after she took on water and flooded the
> > cockpit, the weight of the mast cause a 90 degree roll.  I suspect that
> > they
> > righted her and were then able to bail/pump her out.
> >
> > Hank
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:31 AM, stan <stan at rhodes22.com> wrote:
> >
> >> thanks CC - but with no indication of water depth I still can't tell if
> >> the
> >> boat is sitting on the bottom or if the floatation has succeeded in
> >> keeping
> >> the boat afloat even with all that flooding.
> >>
> >> ss
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "cowie" <ccowie at cowieassociates.com>
> >> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >>  Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:29 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Stan:
> >> >
> >> > I previoulsy posted a pdf file that includes two photos of the Rhodes
> >> > 22
> >> > at
> >> > the Washingtong Sailing Marina and she is not submerged rather flooded
> >> > with
> >> > water.   I will try to post the pdf file again.
> >> >
> >> > http://old.nabble.com/file/p27823731/r22WSM.pdf r22WSM.pdf
> >> >
> >> > Cowie
> >> > R22 2009 Opus
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > stanleyl wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks all for the feedback but I am still flying blind here because
> I
> >> am
> >> >> still missing the answer as to whether any of the 6 boats were
> >> completely
> >> >> submerged so that the deck top was under water.  I had asked that
> >> >> question
> >> >> to get an idea of water depth.  From what I am hearing, the Rhodes
> was
> >> >> never
> >> >> completely submerged.   Were any others?
> >> >>
> >> >> If so, that would indicate deep water and that since the Rhodes deck
> >> >> was
> >> >> still above water, the floatation had done its job.  If all boats had
> >> >> their
> >> >> decks above water that would indicate shallow depth and therefore no
> >> >> positive indication of successful floatation since the boats were
> >> sitting
> >> >> on
> >> >> the bottom, not able to go down far enough to get to the flotation
> >> level.
> >> >>
> >> >> I am interested in getting the hard facts because it is very
> expensive
> >> >> for
> >> >> us to conduct such tests and so we only did it once and those photos
> >> >> showed
> >> >> that the floatation took over when the water lever went just above
> the
> >> >> cockpit seat level.   We would be satisfied if the water level
> reaches
> >> >> the
> >> >> cabin roof before floatation is effective.  In the only report I
> >> >> recall
> >> >> hearing from an owner, attorney Paul Clevenger said that a rouge wave
> >> >> lifted
> >> >> his boat and put it back in the water upside down and it floated and
> >> they
> >> >> disconnected the mast and were able to right it.
> >> >>
> >> >> stan/gbi
> >> >>
> >> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> >> From: <mputnam1 at aol.com>
> >> >> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >> >> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 10:30 AM
> >> >> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> My boat is at the Washington Sailing Marina and it did not go down.
> >> >>> I
> >> >>> asked the guys there about the storm-pushing-the-water-out theory,
> >> >>> and
> >> >>> they assured me that did not happen. They report that all of the
> >> >>> boats
> >> >>> that sank were overloaded with wet snow, began listing to one side,
> >> took
> >> >>> on water and went down.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Mark P.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >> >>> From: R22RumRunner at aol.com
> >> >>> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> >> >>> Sent: Mon, Mar 8, 2010 6:25 am
> >> >>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Stan,
> >> >>> 've been wondering about this ever since it was posted that the
> boats
> >> >>> went
> >> >>> down. The only thing that makes sense to me is that this is a
> shallow
> >> >>> arina and  the storm pushed the water out, allowing the boats to
> >> >>> reach
> >> >>> the
> >> >>> ottom. Boats  without positive flotation didn't have a chance and
> >> >>> probably
> >> >>> illed with water  as the water came back in. The Rhodes had the best
> >> >>> chance of
> >> >>> urvivability  because of the flotation. It was probably filled with
> >> >>> water
> >> >>> nd mud, but still  floating as the water returned.
> >> >>> everal sailboats were laid over on Lake Hartwell when the water went
> >> >>> down
> >> >>> aster than the owners could move them. When the water level came
> back
> >> >>> up,
> >> >>> any  of these boats simply filled with water and laid on the bottom
> >> >>> waiting
> >> >>> or  someone to raise them. Attached is a photo of a San Juan 25 that
> >> was
> >> >>> aised  recently. It sat on the bottom for about nine months before
> >> >>> the
> >> >>> owner
> >> >>> ad her  raised.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> ummy
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> n a message dated 3/7/2010 1:16:51 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> >> >>> tan at rhodes22.com writes:
> >> >>> Dave,
> >> >>> I have not had a clear picture of what  happened.   Were all boats
> >> >>> ompletely
> >> >>> nder water or were parts  of the decks (other than the masts) still
> >> >>> above
> >> >>> ater  level?
> >> >>> stan/gbi
> >> >>>
> >> >>> -------------- next part --------------
> >> >>> non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> >> >>> ame: not available
> >> >>> ype: image/jpeg
> >> >>> ize: 1123147 bytes
> >> >>> esc: not available
> >> >>> rl :
> >> >>>
> >>
>
> http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20100308/d70522b
> f/attachment.jpeg<http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20100308/d70522b%0Af/attachment.jpeg>
> >> >>> __________________________________________________
> >> >>> o subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >> >>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >> >>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> >> >>> archives
> >> >>> go
> >> >>> to
> >> >>> ttp://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> >>> _________________________________________________
> >> >>>
> >> >>> __________________________________________________
> >> >>> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >> >>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >> >>>
> >> >>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> >> >>> archives
> >> >>> go
> >> >>> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> >>> __________________________________________________
> >> >>
> >> >> __________________________________________________
> >> >> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >> >> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >> >>
> >> >> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> archives
> >> go
> >> >> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> >> __________________________________________________
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > View this message in context:
> >> >
> http://old.nabble.com/Washington-Sailing-Marina-tp27816104p27823731.html
> >> > Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >
> >> > __________________________________________________
> >> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >> >
> >> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> >> > go
> >> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> > __________________________________________________
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> >> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >>
> >> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> >> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> >> __________________________________________________
> >>
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 18
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:06:03 -0500
> From: Hank <hnw555 at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID:
>        <c319c8b51003090806p1d300732l3e457096897fdf77 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Stan,
>
> Maybe nobody knows for sure.  Give the Marina a call and ask them.
>
> Hank
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:01 AM, stan <stan at rhodes22.com> wrote:
>
> > I feel like Judge Judy - no one is answering my question of whether the
> > water at those slips is deep enough so that a down boat would be under
> > water.  ( I never asked and had no interest in the water in and out
> > theory).
> > I thought it was a simple question that would establish if a boat went
> down
> > no further because it was sitting on the bottom or it went down no
> further
> > because it was being supported at that level by floatation.
> >
> > ss
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Hank" <hnw555 at gmail.com>
> > To: "The Rhodes 22 Email List" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 10:44 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> >
> >
> > > Stan,
> > >
> > > I think Mark did answer your question.
> > >
> > > My boat is at the Washington Sailing Marina and it did not go down.  I
> > > asked
> > > the guys there about the storm-pushing-the-water-out theory, and they
> > > assured me that did not happen. They report that all of the boats that
> > > sank
> > > were overloaded with wet snow, began listing to one side, took on water
> > > and
> > > went down.
> > >
> > > Mark P.
> > >
> > > I couldn't find the photos on your website of the flotation test.  Did
> > you
> > > do it with the mast installed?  Was it an IMF with Sail?  From the
> photo
> > > of
> > > the boat at WSM it looks like after she took on water and flooded the
> > > cockpit, the weight of the mast cause a 90 degree roll.  I suspect that
> > > they
> > > righted her and were then able to bail/pump her out.
> > >
> > > Hank
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:31 AM, stan <stan at rhodes22.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> thanks CC - but with no indication of water depth I still can't tell
> if
> > >> the
> > >> boat is sitting on the bottom or if the floatation has succeeded in
> > >> keeping
> > >> the boat afloat even with all that flooding.
> > >>
> > >> ss
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: "cowie" <ccowie at cowieassociates.com>
> > >> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > >>  Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:29 AM
> > >> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > Stan:
> > >> >
> > >> > I previoulsy posted a pdf file that includes two photos of the
> Rhodes
> > >> > 22
> > >> > at
> > >> > the Washingtong Sailing Marina and she is not submerged rather
> flooded
> > >> > with
> > >> > water.   I will try to post the pdf file again.
> > >> >
> > >> > http://old.nabble.com/file/p27823731/r22WSM.pdf r22WSM.pdf
> > >> >
> > >> > Cowie
> > >> > R22 2009 Opus
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > stanleyl wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thanks all for the feedback but I am still flying blind here
> because
> > I
> > >> am
> > >> >> still missing the answer as to whether any of the 6 boats were
> > >> completely
> > >> >> submerged so that the deck top was under water.  I had asked that
> > >> >> question
> > >> >> to get an idea of water depth.  From what I am hearing, the Rhodes
> > was
> > >> >> never
> > >> >> completely submerged.   Were any others?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> If so, that would indicate deep water and that since the Rhodes
> deck
> > >> >> was
> > >> >> still above water, the floatation had done its job.  If all boats
> had
> > >> >> their
> > >> >> decks above water that would indicate shallow depth and therefore
> no
> > >> >> positive indication of successful floatation since the boats were
> > >> sitting
> > >> >> on
> > >> >> the bottom, not able to go down far enough to get to the flotation
> > >> level.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I am interested in getting the hard facts because it is very
> > expensive
> > >> >> for
> > >> >> us to conduct such tests and so we only did it once and those
> photos
> > >> >> showed
> > >> >> that the floatation took over when the water lever went just above
> > the
> > >> >> cockpit seat level.   We would be satisfied if the water level
> > reaches
> > >> >> the
> > >> >> cabin roof before floatation is effective.  In the only report I
> > >> >> recall
> > >> >> hearing from an owner, attorney Paul Clevenger said that a rouge
> wave
> > >> >> lifted
> > >> >> his boat and put it back in the water upside down and it floated
> and
> > >> they
> > >> >> disconnected the mast and were able to right it.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> stan/gbi
> > >> >>
> > >> >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> >> From: <mputnam1 at aol.com>
> > >> >> To: <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> > >> >> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 10:30 AM
> > >> >> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> My boat is at the Washington Sailing Marina and it did not go
> down.
> > >> >>> I
> > >> >>> asked the guys there about the storm-pushing-the-water-out theory,
> > >> >>> and
> > >> >>> they assured me that did not happen. They report that all of the
> > >> >>> boats
> > >> >>> that sank were overloaded with wet snow, began listing to one
> side,
> > >> took
> > >> >>> on water and went down.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Mark P.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >> >>> From: R22RumRunner at aol.com
> > >> >>> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> > >> >>> Sent: Mon, Mar 8, 2010 6:25 am
> > >> >>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Washington Sailing Marina
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Stan,
> > >> >>> 've been wondering about this ever since it was posted that the
> > boats
> > >> >>> went
> > >> >>> down. The only thing that makes sense to me is that this is a
> > shallow
> > >> >>> arina and  the storm pushed the water out, allowing the boats to
> > >> >>> reach
> > >> >>> the
> > >> >>> ottom. Boats  without positive flotation didn't have a chance and
> > >> >>> probably
> > >> >>> illed with water  as the water came back in. The Rhodes had the
> best
> > >> >>> chance of
> > >> >>> urvivability  because of the flotation. It was probably filled
> with
> > >> >>> water
> > >> >>> nd mud, but still  floating as the water returned.
> > >> >>> everal sailboats were laid over on Lake Hartwell when the water
> went
> > >> >>> down
> > >> >>> aster than the owners could move them. When the water level came
> > back
> > >> >>> up,
> > >> >>> any  of these boats simply filled with water and laid on the
> bottom
> > >> >>> waiting
> > >> >>> or  someone to raise them. Attached is a photo of a San Juan 25
> that
> > >> was
> > >> >>> aised  recently. It sat on the bottom for about nine months before
> > >> >>> the
> > >> >>> owner
> > >> >>> ad her  raised.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> ummy
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> n a message dated 3/7/2010 1:16:51 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> > >> >>> tan at rhodes22.com writes:
> > >> >>> Dave,
> > >> >>> I have not had a clear picture of what  happened.   Were all boats
> > >> >>> ompletely
> > >> >>> nder water or were parts  of the decks (other than the masts)
> still
> > >> >>> above
> > >> >>> ater  level?
> > >> >>> stan/gbi
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> -------------- next part --------------
> > >> >>> non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> > >> >>> ame: not available
> > >> >>> ype: image/jpeg
> > >> >>> ize: 1123147 bytes
> > >> >>> esc: not available
> > >> >>> rl :
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> >
>
> http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20100308/d70522b
> f/attachment.jpeg<http://www.rhodes22.org/pipermail/rhodes22-list/attachments/20100308/d70522b%0Af/attachment.jpeg>
> > >> >>> __________________________________________________
> > >> >>> o subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > >> >>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >> >>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> > >> >>> archives
> > >> >>> go
> > >> >>> to
> > >> >>> ttp://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >> >>> _________________________________________________
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> __________________________________________________
> > >> >>> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > >> >>> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> > >> >>> archives
> > >> >>> go
> > >> >>> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >> >>> __________________________________________________
> > >> >>
> > >> >> __________________________________________________
> > >> >> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > >> >> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >> >>
> > >> >> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> > archives
> > >> go
> > >> >> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >> >> __________________________________________________
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > View this message in context:
> > >> >
> > http://old.nabble.com/Washington-Sailing-Marina-tp27816104p27823731.html
> > >> > Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >> >
> > >> > __________________________________________________
> > >> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > >> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >> >
> > >> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> archives
> > >> > go
> > >> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >> > __________________________________________________
> > >>
> > >> __________________________________________________
> > >> To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > >> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >>
> > >> For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> > go
> > >> to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >> __________________________________________________
> > >>
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >
> > > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives
> go
> > > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > __________________________________________________
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 19
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:44:40 -0500
> From: Rick <sloopblueheron at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Diamond Board Depth
> To: The Rhodes 22 Email List <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Message-ID:
>        <52e9a141003090844s5c846525ifc9a49f859699880 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Mary Lou,
>
> On mine, a shackel connects the block to the board.
>
> Rick
>
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Mary Lou Troy <mtroy at atlanticbb.net>
> wrote:
>
> > What turning block? Is it on the board itself? I know there are a lot
> > variations. Ours is a direct lift. No blocks.
> >
> > Mary Lou
> >
> > At 07:45 PM 3/8/2010, you wrote:
> > >Chris,
> > >
> > >I don't see your turning block.  Mine is always exposed when my boat is
> on
> > >the lift
> > >--handy for inspecting.  So unless the picture just doesn't show the
> > block,
> > >I would say you need to move your stop knot a bit down the hauling line.
> > >
> > >Rick
> > >
> > >On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:30 AM, cowie <ccowie at cowieassociates.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I took advantage of the warm weather this weekend and got my boat
> ready
> > for
> > > > the spring launch.  With my boat up on jacks I was able to lower the
> > > > diamond
> > > > board all the way and took some measurements.  I measure 24" from the
> > keel
> > > > to the bottom of diamond board and also measure 4-3" to 4'-6" from
> the
> > > > water
> > > > line to the bottom of the diamond board.  My question is this:  is my
> > > > diamond board all the way down at 24"?   I think it is as this seems
> to
> > > > match photos on the GB web site but just want to make sure.  The
> older
> > > > style
> > > > center board seems to be deeper?  Also if the water line to bottom of
> > > > diamond board is 4'-3" less 24" when the board is up then the draft
> is
> > > > about
> > > > 2'-3" not 20" noted on the GB site?  Does the advertised 20" asume a
> > slight
> > > > heel?  Enclosed are some images for reference.
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> http://old.nabble.com/file/p27819957/illustration_02.jpgillustration_02.jpg
> > > >
> > > > Cowie
> > > > Opus 2009
> > > > --
> > > > View this message in context:
> > > > http://old.nabble.com/Diamond-Board-Depth-tp27819957p27819957.html
> > > > Sent from the Rhodes 22 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > > > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > > >
> > > > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> archives
> > go
> > > > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > > > __________________________________________________
> > > >
> > >__________________________________________________
> > >To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > >http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> > >
> > >For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and
> > >archives go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > >__________________________________________________
> > >
> > >No virus found in this incoming message.
> > >Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > >Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2730 - Release Date:
> > >03/08/10 02:34:00
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe go to
> > http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
> >
> > For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go
> > to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
> > __________________________________________________
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rhodes22-list mailing list
> Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>
>
> End of Rhodes22-list Digest, Vol 2146, Issue 1
> **********************************************
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rhodes22-list mailing list
> Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list
>
>
> End of Rhodes22-list Digest, Vol 2147, Issue 1
> **********************************************
>
__________________________________________________
To subscribe/unsubscribe go to http://www.rhodes22.org/mailman/listinfo/rhodes22-list

For the list Charter and help with using the mailing list and archives go to http://www.rhodes22.org/list
__________________________________________________

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2720 - Release Date: 03/09/10 14:33:00