[Rhodes22-list] Can a girlyman be a sailor

Thu Sep 2 11:26:06 EDT 2004

DITTO!!!!!

HURRAY FOR GOD WHO MUST HAVE A PROPHET IN THE VOICE OF STAN!

> From: "stan" <stan at rhodes22.com>
> Organization: general boats
> Reply-To: stan <stan at rhodes22.com>, The Rhodes 22 mail list
> <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 10:16:45 -0400
> To: "The Rhodes 22 mail list" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Can a girlyman be a sailor
> 
> We are back to politics? - Wonderful:
> 
> Notice when it is one of their own they flip flop:
> 
> Cheney's daughter is gay so he is against the constitution amendment.
> 
> Bush's father and TX friends went out of their way to keep him out of the
> fray but if you sign up for it like Kerry did, and find it was a mistake -
> that is a flip flop.
> 
> If anyone else is accused of a conflict of interest, like Clinton's wife was
> strung up for, that is ok, but the flip flop allows Mrs. Cheney to sit on
> the board of our huge defense contractor and that is not a conflict of
> interest.  Under whose definition?.
> 
> If you want to do the real count on flip flops, see Effros book of quotes to
> see who leads by a mile.
> 
> Chris Mathews says the differences in this election are crisp if you look at
> the major issues - I liked the way he put the decision making:
> 
> If you want to cut taxes proportionally much higher for the wealthiest of
> us - you know who to vote for.  .
> 
> If you have reservations on advancing science - you know who to vote for.
> (If you have questions on this one, ask president Regan's son)
> 
> If you want us to lead the world single handedly - you know who to vote for.
> 
> If you do not mind someone else's kid dying to secure Feluja (sp?) as long
> as it is not you or yours who has to die for this strategic piece of land
> needed to keep us free of terrorist - you know who to vote for
> (personally I grieve more for the thousands and thousands whose lives are
> now shattered by wounds then I do for the ones who may be going to heaven to
> get their 40 virgins)
> 
> If you think the way to have no child left behind is to have the rest of the
> children stand still while the left behind kids catch up and therefore flip
> flop over the funding of the program as it was intended - you know who to
> vote for.
> 
> If you think being for the environment is passing a law requiring new energy
> plants to meet regulations and then allowing all energy plants to rebuild
> themselves 99% and call that "not new" so not under the regulations - you
> know who to vote for.
> 
> And if you think the costs of the higher health bills with lower worker
> productivity that results from dismantling in-place environmental
> regulations can be made up with tie-ins to a stock market because it always
> goes up - you know who to vote for.
> 
> If you agree that the super new debt is going to be taken care of by the
> super booming economy just around the corner - you know who to vote for.
> 
> If you think leadership is someone who sits there for seven minutes in a
> helpless state with a totally blanc look when told we are being attacked, or
> who lands on an aircraft carrier and emerges from a war plane announcing the
> war is over when it has not even started, is the kind of man we need to lead
> this country in war - you know who to vote for.
> 
> If you think government should stay off your back and not be telling you how
> to run your personal business and then flip flops and tells you what you
> have to do with your body - you know who to vote for.
> 
> If you think religion should be allowed to sneak into government by funding
> religious organizations and other creeping back door techniques because you
> think religiously controlled countries are more likely to live in peace -
> you know who to vote for  - but you don't know your history or current
> events..
> 
> sorry, I am running out of time - not issues that make this election an easy
> distinction between the two major parties.
> 
> Just go out and vote - or you deserve what you get.  The last election was
> lost to the minority by just a handful of voters not voting to counteract a
> handful of incompetent old Jewish voters who voted for the favorite son,
> Buchanan, because they could not make out a ballot that showed the wrong
> picture next to the one they actually intended to make president.   Vote.
> Your vote does make a difference.
> 
> stan/gbi
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Alm" <salm at mn.rr.com>
> To: "Rhodes" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 3:11 AM
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Can a girlyman be a sailor
> 
> 
>> No doubt it takes that kind of fire power to guard the Republicans and
>> their
>> little get-together this week.  Without them putting their butts on the
>> line, ready to take a bullet for...um...let's see...who?  Just because
>> you're paranoid doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you.  There must be
>> SOMEONE who deserves all that tax-payer money.  Would you take a bullet
>> for
>> a politician that most of the world hates?  I wouldn't.  And if that makes
>> me a girlyman, then show me to the pantyhose isle!  Maybe the original
>> girlyman, Corporal Klinger, had it right all along.  8-)
>> 
>> Slim
>> 
>> On 9/1/04 9:19 PM, "Michael Meltzer" <mjm at michaelmeltzer.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Ok, I have a beer in one hand and bowl of peanuts near the other. Still
>>> wondering about girlymem, I have to admit the 4 grardsman on
>>> the train patform looked cute, the 2 state police riding in the train car
>>> had
>>> nice hair cuts, The 200 plus cops in thier cute blue
>>> NYPD uniforms(48 to 58 street, the waldoff did it) while I walk to the
>>> office.
>>> But the cutest of all was the swat terms(NYDP
>>> specical action units), They look darling standing thier in thier tight
>>> unimforms, standing thier with thier m16a2 finger indexed
>>> long the triger(at least point down) and the selector set to 3 round(I
>>> think
>>> so), I gives me a woody just thinking about it. Bad
>>> day! haw! How many are putting thier ass on the line.
>>> 
>>> MJM
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "ed kroposki" <ekroposki at charter.net>
>>> To: "'The Rhodes 22 mail list'" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:53 AM
>>> Subject: RE: [Rhodes22-list] Can a girlyman be a sailor
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Michael:
>>>> We understand that you had a bad day.  The use of alcohol after such
>>>> a day yields weird results.  Stay away from the bottle.
>>>> Just tune into Rum Runner music: http://users2.ev1.net/~barr/
>>>> Listen and you can tell what rum will do to you.
>>>> 
>>>> Ed K
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
>>>> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of
>>>> R22RumRunner at aol.com
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:18 AM
>>>> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Can a girlyman be a sailor
>>>> 
>>>> Answer......NO. That would be an oxymoron.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Rummy
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>> 
>> __________________________________________________
>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
> 