[Rhodes22-list] Can a girlyman be a sailor

Thu Sep 2 10:32:05 EDT 2004

That away, Stan.  I knew you would enlighten these
folks:-) 
Steve

--- stan <stan at rhodes22.com> wrote:

> We are back to politics? - Wonderful:
> 
> Notice when it is one of their own they flip flop:
> 
> Cheney's daughter is gay so he is against the
> constitution amendment.
> 
> Bush's father and TX friends went out of their way
> to keep him out of the 
> fray but if you sign up for it like Kerry did, and
> find it was a mistake - 
> that is a flip flop.
> 
> If anyone else is accused of a conflict of interest,
> like Clinton's wife was 
> strung up for, that is ok, but the flip flop allows
> Mrs. Cheney to sit on 
> the board of our huge defense contractor and that is
> not a conflict of 
> interest.  Under whose definition?.
> 
> If you want to do the real count on flip flops, see
> Effros book of quotes to 
> see who leads by a mile.
> 
> Chris Mathews says the differences in this election
> are crisp if you look at 
> the major issues - I liked the way he put the
> decision making:
> 
> If you want to cut taxes proportionally much higher
> for the wealthiest of 
> us - you know who to vote for.  .
> 
> If you have reservations on advancing science - you
> know who to vote for. 
> (If you have questions on this one, ask president
> Regan's son)
> 
> If you want us to lead the world single handedly -
> you know who to vote for.
> 
> If you do not mind someone else's kid dying to
> secure Feluja (sp?) as long 
> as it is not you or yours who has to die for this
> strategic piece of land 
> needed to keep us free of terrorist - you know who
> to vote for
> (personally I grieve more for the thousands and
> thousands whose lives are 
> now shattered by wounds then I do for the ones who
> may be going to heaven to 
> get their 40 virgins)
> 
> If you think the way to have no child left behind is
> to have the rest of the 
> children stand still while the left behind kids
> catch up and therefore flip 
> flop over the funding of the program as it was
> intended - you know who to 
> vote for.
> 
> If you think being for the environment is passing a
> law requiring new energy 
> plants to meet regulations and then allowing all
> energy plants to rebuild 
> themselves 99% and call that "not new" so not under
> the regulations - you 
> know who to vote for.
> 
> And if you think the costs of the higher health
> bills with lower worker 
> productivity that results from dismantling in-place
> environmental 
> regulations can be made up with tie-ins to a stock
> market because it always 
> goes up - you know who to vote for.
> 
> If you agree that the super new debt is going to be
> taken care of by the 
> super booming economy just around the corner - you
> know who to vote for.
> 
> If you think leadership is someone who sits there
> for seven minutes in a 
> helpless state with a totally blanc look when told
> we are being attacked, or 
> who lands on an aircraft carrier and emerges from a
> war plane announcing the 
> war is over when it has not even started, is the
> kind of man we need to lead 
> this country in war - you know who to vote for.
> 
> If you think government should stay off your back
> and not be telling you how 
> to run your personal business and then flip flops
> and tells you what you 
> have to do with your body - you know who to vote
> for.
> 
> If you think religion should be allowed to sneak
> into government by funding 
> religious organizations and other creeping back door
> techniques because you 
> think religiously controlled countries are more
> likely to live in peace - 
> you know who to vote for  - but you don't know your
> history or current 
> events..
> 
> sorry, I am running out of time - not issues that
> make this election an easy 
> distinction between the two major parties.
> 
> Just go out and vote - or you deserve what you get. 
> The last election was 
> lost to the minority by just a handful of voters not
> voting to counteract a 
> handful of incompetent old Jewish voters who voted
> for the favorite son, 
> Buchanan, because they could not make out a ballot
> that showed the wrong 
> picture next to the one they actually intended to
> make president.   Vote. 
> Your vote does make a difference.
> 
> stan/gbi
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Steve Alm" <salm at mn.rr.com>
> To: "Rhodes" <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 3:11 AM
> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Can a girlyman be a
> sailor
> 
> 
> > No doubt it takes that kind of fire power to guard
> the Republicans and 
> > their
> > little get-together this week.  Without them
> putting their butts on the
> > line, ready to take a bullet for...um...let's
> see...who?  Just because
> > you're paranoid doesn't mean they're NOT out to
> get you.  There must be
> > SOMEONE who deserves all that tax-payer money. 
> Would you take a bullet 
> > for
> > a politician that most of the world hates?  I
> wouldn't.  And if that makes
> > me a girlyman, then show me to the pantyhose isle!
>  Maybe the original
> > girlyman, Corporal Klinger, had it right all
> along.  8-)
> >
> > Slim
> >
> > On 9/1/04 9:19 PM, "Michael Meltzer"
> <mjm at michaelmeltzer.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Ok, I have a beer in one hand and bowl of peanuts
> near the other. Still
> >> wondering about girlymem, I have to admit the 4
> grardsman on
> >> the train patform looked cute, the 2 state police
> riding in the train car 
> >> had
> >> nice hair cuts, The 200 plus cops in thier cute
> blue
> >> NYPD uniforms(48 to 58 street, the waldoff did
> it) while I walk to the 
> >> office.
> >> But the cutest of all was the swat terms(NYDP
> >> specical action units), They look darling
> standing thier in thier tight
> >> unimforms, standing thier with thier m16a2 finger
> indexed
> >> long the triger(at least point down) and the
> selector set to 3 round(I 
> >> think
> >> so), I gives me a woody just thinking about it.
> Bad
> >> day! haw! How many are putting thier ass on the
> line.
> >>
> >> MJM
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "ed kroposki" <ekroposki at charter.net>
> >> To: "'The Rhodes 22 mail list'"
> <rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:53 AM
> >> Subject: RE: [Rhodes22-list] Can a girlyman be a
> sailor
> >>
> >>
> >>> Michael:
> >>> We understand that you had a bad day.  The use
> of alcohol after such
> >>> a day yields weird results.  Stay away from the
> bottle.
> >>> Just tune into Rum Runner music:
> http://users2.ev1.net/~barr/
> >>> Listen and you can tell what rum will do to you.
> >>>
> >>> Ed K
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
> >>> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On
> Behalf Of
> >>> R22RumRunner at aol.com
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:18 AM
> >>> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Can a girlyman be a
> sailor
> >>>
> >>> Answer......NO. That would be an oxymoron.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Rummy
> >>>
> __________________________________________________
> >>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> __________________________________________________
> >>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> www.rhodes22.org/list
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> __________________________________________________
> >> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> www.rhodes22.org/list
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> www.rhodes22.org/list
> > 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help?
> www.rhodes22.org/list
> 

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail