[Rhodes22-list] !!

Todd Tavares sprocket80 at mail.com
Thu Sep 2 20:57:08 EDT 2004


   PLEASE CHANGE THE  SUBJECT LINE IF YOU WANT TO TALK POLITICS!!!

   (yes I am yelling)

   ----- Original Message -----
   From: Ronald Lipton
   Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 12:09:22 -0500
   To: The Rhodes 22 mail list ,stan
   Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Can a girlyman be a sailor
   > Stan,
   >
   > Thank you very much for taking the time to write your note. I have
   > grown
   > increasingly cynical about politics, the power all seems to be held
   by
   > the groups and businesses with the money to buy PR, and not just
   > ads but the media themselves. Given the backbiting, the politics of
   > personal destruction, the need to kowtow to contributers, I don't
   see
   > how we even get the small fraction of quality politicians that we
   have.
   > But it seems that the fraction is getting smaller. There is always
   > hope ...
   > I guess.
   >
   > By the way, you can get an interesting perspective on the politics
   of
   > ; Texas and the nation in the second volume of the Lyndon Johnson
   > biography by Robert Caro. The Oil companies and Brown and Root
   > (now a division of Haliburton) figure prominently in his first
   stolen
   > senatorial primary as well as his subsequent career. The more things
   > change the more they remain the same.
   >
   > Ron Lipton
   > On Sep 2, 2004, at 9:16 AM, stan wrote:
   >
   > > We are back to politics? - Wonderful:
   > >
   > > Notice when it is one of their own they flip flop:
   > >
   > > Cheney's daughter is gay so he is against the constitution
   amendment.
   > >
   > > Bush's father and TX friends went out of their way to keep him out
   of
   > > the fray but if you sign up for it like Kerry did, and find it was
   a
   > > mistake - that is a flip flop.
   > >
   > > If anyone else is accused of a conflict of interest, like
   Clinton's
   > > wife was strung up for, that is ok, but the flip flop allows Mrs.
   > > Cheney to sit on the board of our huge defense contractor and that
   is
   > > not a conflict of interest. Under whose definition?.
   > >
   > > If you want to do the real count on flip flops, see Effros book of
   > > quotes to see who leads by a mile.
   > >
   > > Chris Mathews says the differences in this election are crisp if
   you
   > > look at the major issues - I liked the way he put the decision
   making:
   > >
   > > If you want to cut taxes proportionally much higher for the
   wealthiest
   > > of us - you know who to vote for. .
   > >
   > > If you have reservations on advancing science - you know who to
   vote
   > > for. (If you have questions on this one, ask president Regan's
   son)
   > >
   > > If you want us to lead the world single handedly - you know who to
   > > vote for.
   > >
   > > If you do not mind someone else's kid dying to secure Feluja (sp?)
   as
   > > long as it is not you or yours who has to die for this strategic
   piece
   > > of land needed to keep us free of terrorist - you know who to vote
   for
   > > (personally I grieve more for the thousands and thousands whose
   lives
   > > are now shattered by wounds then I do for the ones who may be
   going to
   > > heaven to get their 40 virgins)
   > >
   > > If you think the way to have no child left behind is to have the
   rest
   > > of the children stand still while the left behind kids catch up
   and
   > > therefore flip flop over the funding of the program as it was
   intended
   > > - you know who to vote for.
   > >
   > > If you think being for the environment is passing a law requiring
   new
   > > energy plants to meet regulations and then allowing all energy
   plants
   > &g t; to rebuild themselves 99% and call that "not new" so not under
   the
   > > regulations - you know who to vote for.
   > >
   > > And if you think the costs of the higher health bills with lower
   > > worker productivity that results from dismantling in-place
   > > environmental regulations can be made up with tie-ins to a stock
   > > market because it always goes up - you know who to vote for.
   > >
   > > If you agree that the super new debt is going to be taken care of
   by
   > > the super booming economy just around the corner - you know who to
   > > vote for.
   > >
   > > If you think leadership is someone who sits there for seven
   minutes in
   > > a helpless state with a totally blanc look when told we are being
   > > attacked, or who lands on an aircraft carrier and emerges from a
   war
   > > plane announcing the war is over when it has not even started, is
   t he
   > > kind of man we need to lead this country in war - you know who to
   vote
   > > for.
   > >
   > > If you think government should stay off your back and not be
   telling
   > > you how to run your personal business and then flip flops and
   tells
   > > you what you have to do with your body - you know who to vote for.
   > >
   > > If you think religion should be allowed to sneak into government
   by
   > > funding religious organizations and other creeping back door
   > > techniques because you think religiously controlled countries are
   more
   > > likely to live in peace - you know who to vote for - but you don't
   > > know your history or current events..
   > >
   > > sorry, I am running out of time - not issues that make this
   election
   > > an easy distinction between the two major parties.
   > >
   > > Just go out and vote - or you deserve what you get. The last
   election
   > > was lost to the minority by just a handful of voters not voting to
   > > counteract a handful of incompetent old Jewish voters who voted
   for
   > > the favorite son, Buchanan, because they could not make out a
   ballot
   > > that showed the wrong picture next to the one they actually
   intended
   > > to make president. Vote. Your vote does make a difference.
   > >
   > > stan/gbi
   > >
   > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Alm"
   > > To: "Rhodes"
   > > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 3:11 AM
   > > Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Can a girlyman be a sailor
   > >
   > >
   > >> No doubt it takes that kind of fire power to guard the
   Republicans
   > >> and their
   > >> little get-together this week. Without them putting their butts
   on
   > >> the > >> line, ready to take a bullet for...um...let's see...who?
   Just because
   > >> you're paranoid doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you. There
   must
   > >> be
   > >> SOMEONE who deserves all that tax-payer money. Would you take a
   > >> bullet for
   > >> a politician that most of the world hates? I wouldn't. And if
   that
   > >> makes
   > >> me a girlyman, then show me to the pantyhose isle! Maybe the
   original
   > >> girlyman, Corporal Klinger, had it right all along. 8-)
   > >>
   > >> Slim
   > >>
   > >> On 9/1/04 9:19 PM, "Michael Meltzer" wrote:
   > >>
   > >>> Ok, I have a beer in one hand and bowl of peanuts near the
   other.
   > >>> Still
   > >>> wondering about girlymem, I have to admit the 4 grardsman on
   > >>> the train patform looked cute, the 2 state police riding in the
   > >>> train car had
   > >>> nice hair cuts, The 200 plus cops in thier cute blue
   > >>> NYPD uniforms(48 to 58 street, the waldoff did it) while I walk
   to
   > >>> the office.
   > >>> But the cutest of all was the swat terms(NYDP
   > >>> specical action units), They look darling standing thier in
   thier
   > >>> tight
   > >>> unimforms, standing thier with thier m16a2 finger indexed
   > >>> long the triger(at least point down) and the selector set to 3
   > >>> round(I think
   > >>> so), I gives me a woody just thinking about it. Bad
   > >>> day! haw! How many are putting thier ass on the line.
   > >>>
   > >>> MJM
   > >>>
   > >>>
   > >>> ----- Original Message -----
   > >>> From: "ed kroposki" < EKROPOSKI at CHARTER.NET>
   > >>> To: "'The Rhodes 22 mail list'"
   > >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:53 AM
   > >>> Subject: RE: [Rhodes22-list] Can a girlyman be a sailor
   > >>>
   > >>>
   > >>>> Michael:
   > >>>> We understand that you had a bad day. The use of alcohol after
   such
   > >>>> a day yields weird results. Stay away from the bottle.
   > >>>> Just tune into Rum Runner music: http://users2.ev1.net/~barr/
   > >>>> Listen and you can tell what rum will do to you.
   > >>>>
   > >>>> Ed K
   > >>>>
   > >>>>
   > >>>> -----Original Message-----
   > >>>> From: rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org
   > >>>> [mailto:rhodes22-list-bounces at rhodes22.org] On Behalf Of
   > > ;>>> R22RumRunner at aol.com
   > >>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:18 AM
   > >>>> To: rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org
   > >>>> Subject: Re: [Rhodes22-list] Can a girlyman be a sailor
   > >>>>
   > >>>> Answer......NO. That would be an oxymoron.
   > >>>>
   > >>>>
   > >>>> Rummy
   > >>>> __________________________________________________
   > >>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
   > >>>>
   > >>>>
   > >>>> __________________________________________________
   > >>>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
   > >>>>
   > >>>
   > >>> __________________________________________________
   > >>> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rho des22.org/list
   > >>
   > >> __________________________________________________
   > >> Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
   > >
   > > __________________________________________________
   > > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
   > >
   >
   > __________________________________________________
   > Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
   --

   ___________________________________________________________
   Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
   [1]http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

References

   1. http://mail01.mail.com/scripts/payment/adtracking.cgi?bannercode=adsfreejump01


More information about the Rhodes22-list mailing list