[Rhodes22-list] Re: voice recognition programs
Bill Effros
bill at effros.com
Tue Jan 10 10:25:55 EST 2006
Tom,
There used to be several companies developing speech recognition
software. During the dot-com years, one of the companies started buying
up all of the others, using its stock. Then it turned out that they
were cooking the books, and they went bankrupt.
In the process of buying up all the others, the different software teams
were broken up, so it was impossible for the various companies to put
themselves back together. Only one program survived--Dragon--which
contained the retained features of all the different software.
Scansoft -- now called Nuance -- bought the rights to all of the
software that had been developed.
This is probably the only instance in all of recorded history in which
the best features of all the different programs wound up in the software
finally offered to the public. Kurzweil was very good with Artificial
Intelligence, but their speech engine looked at individual words as they
were spoken with pauses between each word. Dragon had an excellent
continuous speech engine, but it was impossibly difficult to correct.
Others had better syntax parsers, more extensive built-in vocabularies,
greater regional dialect interpreters, etc.
I used several different systems over the years. I wound up entering
using Dragon, and correcting using Kurzweil.
Now I am using only Dragon 8. The Dragon 8 system works best if you
enter into its own "notepad" and cut and paste into your final
document. This was always one of the weaknesses of Dragon. Dragon 8
will work properly with most Windows software, but it works best with
its own note pad which is a cut down version of Word, without the bells
and whistles that slow it down.
Dragon 8 will enter into any program faster than you can accurately
type--but in order to achieve top speed -- it can literally enter as
fast as I can speak--and it can enter much faster than I can think --
with 99.75+ accuracy -- you've got to enter into its notepad. Also,
this keeps voice commands consistent, making the system easier to learn
and use.
Basically, Dragon 8 is the only one left standing. Spending time with
it is required to improve its accuracy, and to learn the voice commands
that allow you to control it, instead of the other way around.
The learning curve is less daunting, now that it is so good out of the
box. But people treat it as a curiosity if they fail to use the
built-in artificial intelligence to customize the program to their own
individual voices.
Don't let anyone else try out your system after you've trained it.
Demonstrate it to them; let them set themselves up as a user; but don't
let them mess up your profile.
No, I didn't write this using Dragon. Any time I write more than a
paragraph it would have taken less time had I used Dragon. But when I
think I'm just dashing off a quick note, which then expands...
Bill Effros
SVTRITON at aol.com wrote:
>thanks all
>i havent seen the Al reference ...all i see is the preferred, professional,
>legal and medical...im looking on _www.speechtechnology.com_
>(http://www.speechtechnology.com) ... how do i tell its an Al.
>tom
>__________________________________________________
>Use Rhodes22-list at rhodes22.org, Help? www.rhodes22.org/list
>
>
>
More information about the Rhodes22-list
mailing list