[Rhodes22-list] Political: Reply to Dave about understanding what
is not ...
DCLewis1 at aol.com
DCLewis1 at aol.com
Wed Jul 19 15:48:21 EDT 2006
Hank,
I say again, if you actually read the article you posted, it’s about
California and California politics, and as I recall the word liberal doesn’t even
appear.
I have actually lived in California, and I can attest that not all Democrats
in California are air head liberals.
Ed,
Again, regrettably, we disagree. We agree there were conservative
Democrats, but you say they no longer exist. Let me offer an existence proof: First,
let me be clear, a conservative Democrat, to me, means a responsible adult
affiliated with the Democratic Party. Are there currently responsible adults
openly affiliated with the Democratic Party? Well, how about Warren E
Buffet, does he count? Quite apart from the billions he has amassed, and the
multitude of companies he owns or controls, Mr Buffet was asked by Schwarznegger
to assist with the Calif budget debacle - I’d call Buffet a responsible
adult, and a Democrat. How about Robert Rubin, who was a responsible and
accomplished Secy of the Treasury for Clinton? Compare the parade of Treasury
Secretaries that Mr Bush has had against the performance of Mr Rubin - it’s not
close, Rubin made it work, the other's haven't. Maybe George Soros - who has
amassed a few more billion $, and a few more businesses, than you or I could
be counted as a responsible adult. The list goes on, but the 3 examples above
are clearly and openly affiliated with the Democratic party. The air heads
get the press, but there are a lot of responsible (i.e. conservative)
Democrats that have accomplished much more than you or I. Moreover, I suspect they
understand the distinction between “new conservative" Republicans and the
air-head liberals of yore is a distinction without a difference. Conservative
Democrats, as I’ve defined the term, exist today.
As for the Libertarians, I looked at their material some time ago. It
appeared to me that the Libertarians and the “new conservative" Republicans both
believe that the solution for everything from the West Nile Virus, to defense
spending is that magic phrase “tax cut”. They are going to cut your taxes,
it feels good and, it appeals to the greed in all of us. But exactly what
is the program, exactly how are they going to reduce the government? Well,
that's to be determined, isn't it.
I regard Libertarians advocating reduced government and tax cuts, just as I
regard “new conservative" Republicans advocating reduced government and tax
cuts - with great skepticism. Show me the reduced government spending - show
me the savings - and then we’ll talk about the tax cuts. And before we can
talk about any future tax cuts, we need a huge amount of cost savings to support
tax cuts that were passed as far back as Reagan. The path followed by “new
conservative" Republicans since Reagan has been to just have tax cuts with no
cost savings - we have the debt to prove that claim. Now the “new
conservative" Republican crowd has been found out and blame is coming home to roost,
so they are going to repackage themselves as Libertarians. It’s the same
lame game.
You could do a lot worse than trusting the judgement of people like Warren
Buffet, Robert Rubin, and George Soros - and even Al Gore.
As for "the truth keeping us free", the truth is that we are in hock up far
above our necks as the result of the "new conservative" fiscal follies
(remember Cheney saying "taxes don't matter") and none of the ways out of this mess
are free. The new Treasury Secy, Paulson, is widely expected to "manage" a
devaluation of the dollar. You will quickly appreciate how "free" a solution
that is on your next trip abroad. Perhaps even sooner, you will appreciate
that "free" solution as the effects of a devalued dollar ripple through the
economy via inflation. The truth is that the current Administration has been a
continuing fiscal disaster of historic proportions. A second truth is the
program promised by the Libertarians is exactly the same program that was
promised by the "new conservative" Republicans years ago, and unless they
explicitly identify a coherent program and cost savings, it's likely the same bag of
gas the "new conservative" Republican promise was.
JMO.
Dave
More information about the Rhodes22-list
mailing list